Scan barcode
ninjamuse's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Graphic: Violence and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Misogyny, Sexism, and War
billyjepma's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
3.75
If you can let the time-travel shenanigans do their thing and go along for the ride, though, there's great fun to be had. Crichton's prose is as solid as ever and strikes an ideal balance between description and momentum. There's rarely a dull moment to speak of. Even though the characters are immensely forgettable, they're just likable enough to get the job done, especially when Crichton leans into the inherent silliness of his "fish out of water" premise. You can see where the story is going from the jump, but the secret to Crichton's success has never been the unpredictability of his plotting. Instead, it's his knack for turning familiar genre trappings into fun "summer blockbusters" that makes him one of those authors I'm always happy to pick up. This was a great start to my summer reading!
Graphic: Blood
Moderate: Death, Gore, Sexism, Violence, Fire/Fire injury, and War
Minor: Rape and Pandemic/Epidemic
kfquarium's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Violence, Blood, Murder, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Confinement, Cursing, Misogyny, and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Child death, Rape, Sexual content, and Excrement
omair's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.25
Normally this would all be appealing to me, but this time it misses. Unlike some of his other work, like Jurassic Park, the generic characters that are our protagonists never rise above their predictableness. Timeline ends up being an easy-enough read, but never feels to capture me and rise above. That's not to say it's a bad book, but it is one that won't linger in the mind. A sad sort of irony for a book about time travel to be one I would likely never revisit.
Graphic: Death, Gore, Misogyny, Sexism, Violence, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, War, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
Moderate: Animal death, Body shaming, Bullying, Vomit, Kidnapping, Gaslighting, and Alcohol
Minor: Genocide, Gun violence, Excrement, and Cultural appropriation
angela42's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
3.5
Switching between the past and present, this story follows a group of students as they travel back to medieval times (or technically to a parallel universe) to rescue their professor. This book delightfully has a race against the clock. A lot happens in the short timespan this book takes place in. Occassionally, I would need to take a moment to remember that hours are passing, not days.
Even though this book takes place in medieval times, there is of course also the part that takes place in the present, where Crichton gives detailed descriptions of the technology that is being used to send the students to medieval France. I think this might not appeal to all readers, but for me it is one of the things I like a lot about Crichton's writing.
The story takes quite some time to get to the meat of the story, but I didn't mind.
Overall, a very enjoyable Crichton adventure.
A note on the narration: occassionally words would be pronounced in a way that seemed weird to me. Most notably, the narrator mispronounces the name of the author (???) at the start of the audiobook. I also thought trebuchet was pronounced weirdly, but when I looked it up, I learnt that the t at the end of the word being pronounced is actually a pronunciation recognised by the OED.
Graphic: Violence and Murder
dunecello's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
4.0
Graphic: Violence
Moderate: Misogyny and War
Minor: Animal death, Homophobia, Sexual assault, Torture, and Pandemic/Epidemic
timlucier's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
As an audiobook reader, John Bedford Lloyd was fantastic and I would listen to him again in a heartbeat.
Moderate: Gore, Mental illness, Violence, and War
Minor: Torture
ulespiegel's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Graphic: Gore, Violence, and War
Moderate: Body horror
Minor: Homophobia and Sexual violence
booktothefuture's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Violence and Blood
kingsteph's review against another edition
1.5
Moderate: Violence
Minor: Rape