Scan barcode
amy_da1sy's review against another edition
1.0
This was something I had not enjoyed even a little bit
bridgett_madden's review against another edition
5.0
Honestly, I really liked this book so much I couldn't put it down. Living in Wisconsin, I was able to understand and be apart of the story because of it happening in my area of the state. The writing style is different yes, but I find it so resourceful, though at times she does repeat herself many a time, the details and research is outstanding.
emgoboingo's review
3.0
Marcic tries hard to investigate a deeply personal subject (the murder of her uncle by the hands of a family matter) objectively but ultimately fills the book with justified anger and resentment towards the perpetrators. The result is a memoir that seems to be fighting itself the whole time.
duchessofreadin's review against another edition
3.0
More twists and turns than a wadded up roll of duct tape.... which in this case, could have been extremely useful!
Warning.... there are spoilers..
Vernie Stordock was a family man, respected police officer and all around great guy - until the night he was murdered. It was not just murder... it was the slow systematic wiping out of any life he might have had before he met Suzanne. His niece, Dorothy and his daughter Shannon have had theories and questions for years. Dorothy finally decides to see if she can get to the bottom of the story, and begins to unravel the mysterious surrounding involving Suzanne, her children, and of course - how in the world a professed murderer gets only 11 months in a mental hospital to be "cured" and released.
Now the juicy parts of the story. You are going to hate Suzanne. You have to. The entire story reeks of narcissistic/pathological issues that you can see building through the fabrics of the relationships she had before she met Vernie. It was Suzanne or the highway.. her way or no way. Somehow, she always got exactly what she wanted. She used her body, she used threats, and when it came down to it - violence (for real, exactly how MANY bodies have to accumulate around someone before it gets questioned). But I digress, we are discussing the Vernie situation here..
Suzanne admitted her role in the murder, explained how she did it, and then somehow manipulated the system to barely spend any time in prison, walk out smelling like roses, and managed to claim the entire estate of Vernie, and then some. She was not happy to walk away with the life insurance, she had to hurt his first family by taking half of everything they had, just because she could.
This book... this book is a hard one for me to rate and review. I liked it, I hated it, I questioned the author and her true motives. I wanted more. I wanted to see more answers from the departments involved, the DA, the ADA (who was disbarred), the Sheriff, and most of all, the doctors who allowed this woman to outsmart them. She played each and every person like a fiddle and they sang the exact tune that she wanted. Beethoven would have been proud at the master theater production she managed to concoct and have everyone swaying to her own personal waltz.
I had to admit, I got a little irritated with all the "we had an instant connection" "they were wearing a...." moments. I don't care what someone is wearing. This book is not about clothing and fashion, or the sound of someone's voice. It was a fact, theory expounding, nail the murderer of her uncle book.
I honestly could not tell if the author was satisfied with the findings of the case by the time the book closed. It felt to open to me. Why was David never fully questioned? How in the world could they not go back and amend the charges? There is no statute of limitations on murder, and the fact that the person they suspected was now dead had nothing to do with it. Suzanne was a liar, and that was enough to throw everything out the window and start again. Sadly, the records from the case have mostly been destroyed and many of the people who knew anything are also passing away. This case is a huge miscarriage of justice, and the family of Vernie Stordock never got full closure. As I worked through the case putting the evidence together, it never fully fit to me that Suzanne was the person who pulled the trigger. She was a master manipulator, and would get anyone else to do their work for them (i.e. she even used her own step-daughters research for her thesis/dissertation). Suzanne was not mentally ill, she did not have a lapse in judgement, and I very highly doubt that her husband was ever violent towards her, unless he was protecting himself from her. She manipulated each and every situation she was in. Full blown narcissistic behavior, and more probable, a high functioning sociopath. This woman was the very epitome of evil, who used her children to get what she wanted, and ignored them the remainder of the time. For them to have stuck with her as long as they did, I was surprised, but then again - manipulation goes a long way and when you have been conditioned since childhood with it, there is not much you can do to get away from it.
Like I said above, I had a hard time rating this book. I felt it was really rambly in a lot of ways (kind of like my review), but I think she started off on the right track. If she had stuck to the case, and not let emotion sweep through (hard because it was family), it would have made a more cohesive read. I wonder now about the family of this master manipulator, and how much they truly knew about the "unfortunate situation".
Warning.... there are spoilers..
Vernie Stordock was a family man, respected police officer and all around great guy - until the night he was murdered. It was not just murder... it was the slow systematic wiping out of any life he might have had before he met Suzanne. His niece, Dorothy and his daughter Shannon have had theories and questions for years. Dorothy finally decides to see if she can get to the bottom of the story, and begins to unravel the mysterious surrounding involving Suzanne, her children, and of course - how in the world a professed murderer gets only 11 months in a mental hospital to be "cured" and released.
Now the juicy parts of the story. You are going to hate Suzanne. You have to. The entire story reeks of narcissistic/pathological issues that you can see building through the fabrics of the relationships she had before she met Vernie. It was Suzanne or the highway.. her way or no way. Somehow, she always got exactly what she wanted. She used her body, she used threats, and when it came down to it - violence (for real, exactly how MANY bodies have to accumulate around someone before it gets questioned). But I digress, we are discussing the Vernie situation here..
Suzanne admitted her role in the murder, explained how she did it, and then somehow manipulated the system to barely spend any time in prison, walk out smelling like roses, and managed to claim the entire estate of Vernie, and then some. She was not happy to walk away with the life insurance, she had to hurt his first family by taking half of everything they had, just because she could.
This book... this book is a hard one for me to rate and review. I liked it, I hated it, I questioned the author and her true motives. I wanted more. I wanted to see more answers from the departments involved, the DA, the ADA (who was disbarred), the Sheriff, and most of all, the doctors who allowed this woman to outsmart them. She played each and every person like a fiddle and they sang the exact tune that she wanted. Beethoven would have been proud at the master theater production she managed to concoct and have everyone swaying to her own personal waltz.
I had to admit, I got a little irritated with all the "we had an instant connection" "they were wearing a...." moments. I don't care what someone is wearing. This book is not about clothing and fashion, or the sound of someone's voice. It was a fact, theory expounding, nail the murderer of her uncle book.
I honestly could not tell if the author was satisfied with the findings of the case by the time the book closed. It felt to open to me. Why was David never fully questioned? How in the world could they not go back and amend the charges? There is no statute of limitations on murder, and the fact that the person they suspected was now dead had nothing to do with it. Suzanne was a liar, and that was enough to throw everything out the window and start again. Sadly, the records from the case have mostly been destroyed and many of the people who knew anything are also passing away. This case is a huge miscarriage of justice, and the family of Vernie Stordock never got full closure. As I worked through the case putting the evidence together, it never fully fit to me that Suzanne was the person who pulled the trigger. She was a master manipulator, and would get anyone else to do their work for them (i.e. she even used her own step-daughters research for her thesis/dissertation). Suzanne was not mentally ill, she did not have a lapse in judgement, and I very highly doubt that her husband was ever violent towards her, unless he was protecting himself from her. She manipulated each and every situation she was in. Full blown narcissistic behavior, and more probable, a high functioning sociopath. This woman was the very epitome of evil, who used her children to get what she wanted, and ignored them the remainder of the time. For them to have stuck with her as long as they did, I was surprised, but then again - manipulation goes a long way and when you have been conditioned since childhood with it, there is not much you can do to get away from it.
Like I said above, I had a hard time rating this book. I felt it was really rambly in a lot of ways (kind of like my review), but I think she started off on the right track. If she had stuck to the case, and not let emotion sweep through (hard because it was family), it would have made a more cohesive read. I wonder now about the family of this master manipulator, and how much they truly knew about the "unfortunate situation".
ksammons's review against another edition
3.0
I wanted to love this book because Dorothy Marcic is such an endearing human being. She does an excellent job making the reader feel like her friend and confidant, and I found myself trying to convince myself that this was a really great read. While the story itself is interesting--all the players are fascinating, especially Suzanne the mid-western femme fatale at the heart of the story--the writing is middling and unfocused. Often I felt like I was reading a student research paper when they didn't have quite enough content to meet the word count requirements. There was a ton of repetition, and the organization was strange. I found myself struggling to get through this, which was really sad for me. I think this is a fascinating story, and an extremely well-researched passion project. I think in the hands of a more skilled writer, or perhaps editor, this would be gripping. However, as it stands, the flaws made this a bit of a dud.
onejordo's review against another edition
1.0
Thank you NetGalley and Kensington Books for an advanced copy of this book. My honest review follows.
I gave this book one star because of the way it was written rather than for the story that was told. Perhaps I received the second draft of this story but the writing was angry, biased, and hard to follow at times. This could have used a few more editing sessions.
The author's uncle was killed, murdered, decades ago. It is possible the person who was punished for his murder, his wife, was not the person who killed him. The wife, the author's former aunt, is a manipulative, devious character.
The bones of an interesting true crime story are here. The execution just simply failed. Reader, beware. Wait for the revised edition of this book to come out before reading it.
I gave this book one star because of the way it was written rather than for the story that was told. Perhaps I received the second draft of this story but the writing was angry, biased, and hard to follow at times. This could have used a few more editing sessions.
The author's uncle was killed, murdered, decades ago. It is possible the person who was punished for his murder, his wife, was not the person who killed him. The wife, the author's former aunt, is a manipulative, devious character.
The bones of an interesting true crime story are here. The execution just simply failed. Reader, beware. Wait for the revised edition of this book to come out before reading it.
readingwithk's review
2.0
(1.5 stars)
When I started this book I was totally intrigued, but as the book continued I found myself annoyed.
I thought that the look into family dynamics in this book was interesting. However, the fact that the author was so deeply involved with the actual case and clearly let her own feelings affect her research and claims was upsetting and discredited most of the work for me.
When I started this book I was totally intrigued, but as the book continued I found myself annoyed.
I thought that the look into family dynamics in this book was interesting. However, the fact that the author was so deeply involved with the actual case and clearly let her own feelings affect her research and claims was upsetting and discredited most of the work for me.
More...