Reviews with content warning for Violence - The Sign of the Four

The Sign of Four é o segundo livro na série de Sherlock Holmes e, na minha opinião, foi melhor do que o primeiro. Nessa obra a atmosfera de Londres Vitoriana estava ainda mais intensa e mesmo quando em partes do livro a narrativa mudou de localização para a Índia enquanto um dos personagens contava partes da história foi muito mais atmosférico e misterioso do que o enorme flashback nos Estados Unidos de A Study in Scarlet. A narrativa, acredito, foi mais bem construída também pois Holmes e Watson figuram na maior parte da história e não foram necessárias extensas porções do livro com personagens secundários e longe dos protagonistas, como foi o caso do primeiro livro. Em The Sign of Four foi introduzido a personagem Mary, interesse romântico de Watson. Ela é honesta, firme, de caráter e coragem, mas não foi particularmente marcante. O mistério foi mais intrigante também em relação ao primeiro livro, apesar do tema vingança ter se repetido, esse foi desenvolvido de forma mais interessante.

O cenário montado nessa segunda obra foi bem mais estimulante, especialmente com cenas marcantes como a cena de um dos personagens no seu leito de morte vendo na janela o rosto terrível do homem que temia.

Mesmo já sabendo um pouco do que se tratava a resolução do mistério (em se tratando de Sherlock Holmes é quase impossível não ter nenhum spoiler) ainda assim desfrutei da leitura. O ponto negativo do livro foi o racismo e o body shaming direcionado ao personagem que pertencia a um dos povos pigmeus. Isso é não justificável, mas esperado de um livro escrito em 1890. Tendo isso em vista minha nota da obra é baseada na atmosfera, personagens e o mistério desenvolvido. Assim dou 4.5 estrelas.

Content Warnings

orchidlilly's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.5

Ok, wow, mixed bag on this one. On one hand, the mystery its self is very fun; locked room, treasure, a mysterious calling card, its all cool. On the other hand, good God is this one racist. Most of the ACD Sherlock stories I've read keep that good ole' English racism to a minimum, but The Sign of Four seems to have dialed it up to ten to make up for that. I don't think you can go two pages here without reading multiple paragraphs of Watson or some other character just using the rudest, most vile descriptions possible for Indian people. I can't say I didn't expect it, because I know just how horribly the English viewed Indian people at the time, but that doesn't make it any more pleasant to read. I'm not kidding, though, the racism in this one is really really bad, especially because we don't get the usual Holmes thing of having the story at least somewhat go 'um, actually, the people society hates are actually just people and it is in fact the rich bastards who suck'. Just yikes.

Content Warnings

theresacharlotte's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Content Warnings

pvbobrien's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

Content Warnings

ekevka's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

Content Warnings

em_davies7019's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Content Warnings

danny_fox's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0

Okay, so, I'm finally done with this book, took me a while.
My honest rating for this book would be around 4.5, again, maybe a bit more? Since I liked this book more than the previous one, and that one I also said it's 4.5.... 4.7 maybe?

Like for my previous review on A Study In Scarlet, I will mention 3 things I liked about this book and 3 I didn't. I will also be comparing it a lot to A Study In Scarlet.

What I liked:

- We got waaaaaaay more John and Sherlock content than in the previous one. I love their relationship, so seeing that the whole book focused on them (unlike the first one) that made me quite happy. The book had a bunch of great moments and wholesome scenes between the two.

- As I mentioned before, there were a lot more fun scenes and interesting quotes. I almost gave up on the first book, but with this one, I didn't have trouble finishing it.

- We learned more about Sherlock, which I found really cool. I feel like this book gave us some more information on him, we learned some of his flaws and opinions, which makes him feel more like a real person. Characters are the most important thing to me in the stories, so I was glad they got more development.

Bonus: The last few lines in the book were so intereeeeeesting. It felt cool, but sad, but interesting. The last line really made me feel like :O.

What I didn't like:

- The mystery was eh. I found the plot from the first book (aka A Study In Scarlet) to be more interesting. The whole mystery in this book just wasn't as interesting and felt a bit slow. I was also not the fan of the whole treasure thing. The mystery from the previous book just felt more intriguing to me, but that's just my opinion, as is this whole review. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

- The villain was just... kinda disappointing?? Again, I am gonna compare this to the first book, and say that the "villain" from that one is way more interesting. The murderer felt more morally gray, and when I was done reading the book, I was sort of thinking to myself "okay, sure, he killed someone, but I don't really hate him for it?" I felt more sympathy towards him.
With this dude, I just felt nothing. So I found him to be more boring.

- Again, there were some lines and things characters would say that would now be seen as offensive. It's an old book, so it goes without saying that there will be some parts that felt iffy. I would suggest looking into this topic before reading the book.

Final thoughts:
Despite it all, I think A Sign Of Four is definitely an improvement from A Study In Scarlet. Even tho the plot was not really my thing, I still enjoyed the story a lot. Seeing Sherlock and John just solve the mystery together was super fun. Looking forward to the next story in the series. :D

Content Warnings

caitlin_doggos's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

Content Warnings

More...