Reviews

Sweet Myth-Tery of Life, by Robert Lynn Asprin

verkisto's review

Go to review page

4.0

The One About the Women

So, Skeeve can sometimes be full of himself. Being the narrator, and being the heart that holds M.Y.T.H. Inc. together, can do that to a person. He can also be a bit clueless, which is part of his charm, but all those aspects of his character come together in this book, where he finds himself trying to solve the mystery of women. Seeing as he's inept with them up to and including this book, it makes for an interesting plot, except that the book doesn't really have one.

Its premise is that he has to decide whether to marry Queen Hemlock, who has given him the choice of marrying her to help rule the kingdom, or not marry her, at which point she will abdicate the throne and leave him to rule the kingdom anyway. Over the course of the book, he has to think about Hemlock, Tananda, Luanne, Bunny, and Massha, along with Kalvin, the djinn from Myth-nomers and Im-pervections, and his wife and what they mean to him. It's a bit troublesome for me, as Asprin takes these characters who are all fulfilled and reduces them to objects for Skeeve to consider.

Hemlock and Luanne aren't developed enough to be more than just objects, and Tananda, Bunny, and Massha keep the characteristics that make them more than objects, but they're still evaluated that way over the course of the story. Skeeve even admits that he doesn't even think of Massha as a woman, due to her size. He reduces these women to their attractiveness. This isn't a new thing in the series (Tananda is often described physically before anything else, as if that is her most important attribute), but it became more noticeable in this book, where everything is about these women and their attractiveness.

Aside from all that, the book isn't as engaging because nothing really happens. Skeeve has to decide what to do about Queen Hemlock, and he does (with about as much of an anticlimax as there was in M.Y.T.H. Inc. Link), but otherwise it's just about Skeeve moping and mooning about his decision. In addition, this book is peppered with typos (including a bunch of "it's" for "its"), which get distracting after a while. Then there's that cliffhanger ending that leads into the final book in the series, which wasn't published until six years after this one. Remember, I was reading these as they were released back in high school.

I can't deny that I had fun reading the book, since it maintained the same style and feel as the previous books, but I also can't deny that I saw a lot of problems with it. I didn't notice them when I was younger, as I didn't notice Piers Anthony's problems with women in all of his books, so maybe that was still the nostalgia talking. Now, though, it's hard to evaluate the book as a story when I find myself cringing at how Asprin portrays the female characters.

urbaer's review

Go to review page

2.0

Not the best in the series. Next to nothing happens and it just feels like each chapter is an excuse for someone else to give Skeeve a lecture or have a discussion about the purpose of marriage or...

urgh...

And then at the end it previews the next book by saying "find out all the interesting stuff that was going on while all this boring stuff was happening!"

kikiandarrowsfishshelf's review

Go to review page

1.0

Skeeve does seem to treat women as things, and this is what contributed to my discontinuing the reading of the books. The book seems to be trying to reach a conclusion that it never gets to. There seems to be no point or plot, perhaps that really is life but it doesn’t work in this book.

tregina's review

Go to review page

2.0

And here we come to the last of the books I read in my youth. Since this has been an exercise in nostalgia for me, I don't think I'm going to go on to read the rest of the available books, at least not right now.

It's an interesting note to end on. I've said over and over that the series is basically terrible with women, reducing even the main characters to their physical appearances and at least once a book treating women like objects or prizes. This one is no different, except for the fact that it acknowledges what it's doing. Some of the women call the men out on what they're doing, in text, and yet the narrative still treats women like objects. Not to mention the relentless heterosexuality (not just in practice, because frankly most things still do that, but in statements like (I paraphrase here) 'all healthy boys like girls').

I've enjoyed rereading these, but I've also ended up a lot more judgmental about my younger self's taste in reading materials.
More...