The design and UX isn't done, Rob and Abbie, okkurrrr! 😌
thisgrrlreads's review
2.0
I can thank my brother for this thriller that I grabbed for the plane ride back to Chicago, and let me tell you, it's good plane ride reading. Aside from that, there may be a little too much going on what with cloning people from the year zero CE, an ancient plague come back to life, raiding of ancient grave sites, teen geniuses creating wonky creatures grown in artificial wombs, I won't continue. But if you're into that sort of thing, like my brother, read this book.
silverthistle5b786's review
2.0
I think I read a different book to the one that was advertised on the back cover blurb. The book sounded really interesting and a bit different to most other 'end of the world' scenarios I've read but mostly it's just not that gripping once you get into it. It's a steady story which kept me turning pages - but only to try and get to the tale that was promised. I don't usually quote a synopsis in my reviews but I'm going to break with tradition here so that you know what the story wasn't about.
"An archaeological manhunt is raging in the holy land -- a hunt for the historical Jesus. Nathan Lee, the thief of bones, comes face-to-face with men made from the very relics he looted, one of whom claims to be Jesus Christ, but may also be Patient Zero."
Sounds like Jesus is an integral part of the story, no? Nope. Blink and you'll miss it and even if you catch it it's not what you're expecting/hoping for.
The synopsis sounded good to me and the first few chapters were really promising but very quickly I lost interest in the main character, which isn't really what you're looking for in a book.
My indifference to Nathan Lee (for some reason even his name gets on my nerves) meant that I never really got involved with his struggles and/or experiences.
There are also a few characters we meet and I'm still not sure why or how they figure in the story. They're given fairly large chunks of storyline but if they were removed I can't say that it would take much away from the tale.
It's not the worst book I've ever read, but I'm a bit disappointed that the fabulous story I was looking forward to wasn't forthcoming. I think that if I wasn't misled into looking for a story that wasn't there, then I might have got involved more. But, before I knew it I was at the end and left wondering if I'd missed a chapter or 3. The conclusion when it comes seems so rushed that I had to go back and re-read the last few chapters because I was sure I'd missed a crucial pivotal moment. I hadn't....and there wasn't...
It's a bit of a mish-mash of ideas going on actually and not all of it gels when thrown together into a single story. The worst part is the the virus itself, which the book revolves around....it's just madness. Utter tripe!
For fans of apocalyptic plague fiction, give it a whirl....just don't expect what's written on the back cover.
It's not a book I'd go back to, but since it belongs to a genre that I'm very fond of, I'm glad I read it.
"An archaeological manhunt is raging in the holy land -- a hunt for the historical Jesus. Nathan Lee, the thief of bones, comes face-to-face with men made from the very relics he looted, one of whom claims to be Jesus Christ, but may also be Patient Zero."
Sounds like Jesus is an integral part of the story, no? Nope. Blink and you'll miss it and even if you catch it it's not what you're expecting/hoping for.
The synopsis sounded good to me and the first few chapters were really promising but very quickly I lost interest in the main character, which isn't really what you're looking for in a book.
My indifference to Nathan Lee (for some reason even his name gets on my nerves) meant that I never really got involved with his struggles and/or experiences.
There are also a few characters we meet and I'm still not sure why or how they figure in the story. They're given fairly large chunks of storyline but if they were removed I can't say that it would take much away from the tale.
It's not the worst book I've ever read, but I'm a bit disappointed that the fabulous story I was looking forward to wasn't forthcoming. I think that if I wasn't misled into looking for a story that wasn't there, then I might have got involved more. But, before I knew it I was at the end and left wondering if I'd missed a chapter or 3. The conclusion when it comes seems so rushed that I had to go back and re-read the last few chapters because I was sure I'd missed a crucial pivotal moment. I hadn't....and there wasn't...
It's a bit of a mish-mash of ideas going on actually and not all of it gels when thrown together into a single story. The worst part is the the virus itself, which the book revolves around....it's just madness. Utter tripe!
For fans of apocalyptic plague fiction, give it a whirl....just don't expect what's written on the back cover.
It's not a book I'd go back to, but since it belongs to a genre that I'm very fond of, I'm glad I read it.
ibeforem's review
3.0
This book had a lot crammed into it. Religion, cloning, plague, messiahs… The basic premise is that a man searching for physical proof of Jesus unknowingly releases a Bibical age plague with no cure onto the world.
I believe this was a first-time author, and in places it shows. It got a little lost somewhere in the middle. A great deal was made about a few characters who then disappeared until the very end.
Overall, it was quite an interesting story with an ending I didn’t expect.
I believe this was a first-time author, and in places it shows. It got a little lost somewhere in the middle. A great deal was made about a few characters who then disappeared until the very end.
Overall, it was quite an interesting story with an ending I didn’t expect.
More...