percy_march's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

4.0

Overall, this was a pretty good read. It definitely got better as the book progressed, but I did become very invested in and entertained by the stories told by Rosenbloom. We got the French Revolution, we got body-snatchers, we got death positivity, antique book loving, and discussions of body materiality.

What really pissed me off though is her dismissal of any other viewpoints on anthropodermic bibliopegy. She would use any topic to bring up how books containing human remains shouldn't be re-intered and stayed remarkably impartial - uncharacteristically so - when bringing up NAGPRA and repatriation. It was very... "neo-liberal millennial" style of speaking on the issues of historic racism, sexism, and medical abuse. 

Also, if you try to go for the audiobook - the narrator kept doing accents for people she was quoting/referencing, and it was too much. It really, really needed to stop.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

apersonfromflorida's review

Go to review page

dark informative reflective medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

rtaire's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional hopeful informative reflective slow-paced

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

aegagrus's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.75

Dark Archives begins with a seemingly niche focus -- books bound in human skin -- and successfully covers a lot of ground -- medicine, history, psychology, ethics, law, artistry, craft, archiving, collecting. The amount of work Rosenbloom put into Dark Archives is immediately evident. Her book reflects a wide array of fieldwork -- visits to tanneries and med schools, conversations with eminent collectors, novel scientific testing, intensive rummaging in museums and archives. It also reflects considerable thoughtfulness. Rosenbloom has clearly tried very hard to treat the stories she's telling seriously, treating the dead and the living alike with empathy and curiosity. Her most interesting reflections arise from that commitment; for instance, she wonders at length about the clinical gaze, about the status and responsibilities of physicians, about the relevance of gender, race, and class to our notions of doctors and doctoring. In a genuinely moving (if somewhat tangential) epilogue, Rosenbloom muses about her own death and her mother's own tragic interaction with the medical establishment.

The personal angle so central to Dark Archives certainly ties everything together fairly neatly, along with lending real credibility to Rosenbloom as an expert librarian and bibliophile. On the other hand, the highly conversational personal asides were often the points at which I was least satisfied with the book as a whole. A roughly chronological narrative about Megan Rosenbloom and her journey into and through the world of human-bound books and the lessons they hold could have been very successful. A more expansive and thematically-organized book could have been equally successful, taking full advantage of the rich interdisciplinary knowledge Rosenbloom is drawing upon. Instead, Rosenbloom has attempted something of a middle ground between these approaches. She is not wholly unsuccessful at striking this balance, but it does produce a book which is, from time to time, dissatisfying in its multifarious structure and direction. This objection is not to be overstated, however: wherever a reader's interest in the subject derives, Dark Archives has much to offer. 


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

talonsontypewriters's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

horrorandscience's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative mysterious medium-paced

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

maria_s's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective medium-paced

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings