whatchusellin's review against another edition
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
I feel like this book should be taught in English class in place of 1984 and Fahrenheit 451. It has commentary on politics, censorship, the government, and race. It is so beautifully written and also depicts the intimate relationship of mother and child’s in both perspectives. It was a slower paced and quite a different style than Ng’s previous novels. I will forever love Celeste Ng’s writing <3
Content Warnings
Moderate: Racism
crownoflaurel's review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Abandonment
Moderate: Xenophobia and Racism
Minor: Hate crime, Death of parent, and Police brutality
readwithmesarah's review against another edition
challenging
dark
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Racism
dananana's review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Police brutality, Hate crime, Racism, and Xenophobia
Moderate: Sexual assault
Minor: Deportation
snowdog's review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Content Warnings
Moderate: Racism, Physical abuse, Bullying, Death, and Hate crime
emtees's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
hopeful
mysterious
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Our Missing Hearts is a slow burn of a book. It dragged for me a bit in the beginning, left me unsure and a little uncomfortable in the middle, but landed with a punch in the end.
Bird is a 12 year old boy living in a United States where, for ten years, the set of laws known as PACT, which make any words or behavior deemed unpatriotic illegal, has ruled his life. He and his father live a restricted, careful life, working at all times to appear unremarkable. Though they don’t talk about it, Bird knows this is because his mother, Margaret, who disappeared years ago, is associated with anti-PACT protestors; “bring back our missing hearts,” the slogan of these protesters, referencing the children seized from the homes of “un-American” parents, is adapted from one of her poems. Bird doesn’t know how to reconcile the idea of a woman leading a clandestine battle against the government with the creative, loving mother who made his childhood into a fairytale of games and stories. But when he receives a mysterious postcard from her, the first contact in three years, he sets out on a journey to track her down and learn the truth of her life.
This is a book that builds slowly, and in my opinion only gets better as it does. It begins by immersing the reader in the world of Bird, one where government propaganda in schools and fear of the authorities at home is normal. This isn’t a futuristic dystopia - other than the constant recitations of PACT’s promises in school, it’s not very different from American life in 2023 - and so the differences only seep in slowly, eerie and disturbing against the backdrop of normalacy, like the protest art that appears, unexpected and unexplained, on the college campus where Bird lives. (Which is Harvard. For some reason, the book goes out of its way not to say the name of the school, but if you know the area, that’s it.) Later, in telling Margaret’s journey from an ambitious college poet to a content stay-at-home mother to the face of a movement, Ng takes us back to a world that is our own and charts how it could have made the journey to fascism and fear. In doing so, she makes the smart decision to stick close to her characters. There are massive federal and international powers behind the changes this society undergoes, but we don’t see them; instead, we stick with Margaret and her peers, ordinary people, and see the ways their changing society didn’t impact them at all, until it did and it was too late to stop it. This is both emotionally effective - Ng is writing about the way injustice hurts individuals, families, children - and perhaps papers over a few places where the world building is simplified to get the story to where it needs to go.
The character work is mostly very strong in this book. Ethan and Margaret, Bird’s parents, are both carefully drawn characters. We see them first through the eyes of their young son, adults, fully formed and set in their ways; later, when we hear their story in full, it is easy to see the line between the characters they really are and who Bird perceived them to be while still acknowledging the way a child’s view simplified them. Many other side characters - Sadie, Bird’s friend, one of the children taken from the home of parents deemed unfit to raise her; Domi, Margaret’s friend; the librarians who are the secret heroes of this world - come to life with only a few lines. By contrast, I have to say that Bird himself was the weakest character. In the early pages of the book, he comes across as extremely young - I was actually a little surprised to realize he was twelve, since his perspective seems to be one of someone who doesn’t understand what’s going on around him. And yet he accomplishes frankly incredible things on his journey to find his mother. It’s the kind of unlikely combination of innocence and extreme competence that you find in children’s books but it was a bit jarring in an adult novel.
The building of this alternative world is interesting. The world of PACT is one in which a devastating financial crisis, believed by some to have been instigated by China, leads to a huge uptick in anti-Asian sentiment in the US. While obviously this will resonate after COVID, there is a risk in telling a story about prejudice and injustice that relies on fictional events while set the real world, where real injustice still exists. In the early pages of the book, I was concerned that this new source of racism and fear would swamp the real experiences of a variety of people who experience prejudice in this world. But it is clear that Ng was aware of these concerns and wove them into her world. As the story continues, she ties the fictional events to the real-world history of racism, government persecution, and particularly the threat of taking children from “undesirable” families, whether that’s the existence of schools to reeducate indigenous children or the modern foster care system. There is clearly deep thought and a very realistic eye behind this story.
The book did not end as I expected it to but it did end powerfully, if in a quieter way. It was hopeful without being unrealistic, unsettling but also meaningful.
Bird is a 12 year old boy living in a United States where, for ten years, the set of laws known as PACT, which make any words or behavior deemed unpatriotic illegal, has ruled his life. He and his father live a restricted, careful life, working at all times to appear unremarkable. Though they don’t talk about it, Bird knows this is because his mother, Margaret, who disappeared years ago, is associated with anti-PACT protestors; “bring back our missing hearts,” the slogan of these protesters, referencing the children seized from the homes of “un-American” parents, is adapted from one of her poems. Bird doesn’t know how to reconcile the idea of a woman leading a clandestine battle against the government with the creative, loving mother who made his childhood into a fairytale of games and stories. But when he receives a mysterious postcard from her, the first contact in three years, he sets out on a journey to track her down and learn the truth of her life.
This is a book that builds slowly, and in my opinion only gets better as it does. It begins by immersing the reader in the world of Bird, one where government propaganda in schools and fear of the authorities at home is normal. This isn’t a futuristic dystopia - other than the constant recitations of PACT’s promises in school, it’s not very different from American life in 2023 - and so the differences only seep in slowly, eerie and disturbing against the backdrop of normalacy, like the protest art that appears, unexpected and unexplained, on the college campus where Bird lives. (Which is Harvard. For some reason, the book goes out of its way not to say the name of the school, but if you know the area, that’s it.) Later, in telling Margaret’s journey from an ambitious college poet to a content stay-at-home mother to the face of a movement, Ng takes us back to a world that is our own and charts how it could have made the journey to fascism and fear. In doing so, she makes the smart decision to stick close to her characters. There are massive federal and international powers behind the changes this society undergoes, but we don’t see them; instead, we stick with Margaret and her peers, ordinary people, and see the ways their changing society didn’t impact them at all, until it did and it was too late to stop it. This is both emotionally effective - Ng is writing about the way injustice hurts individuals, families, children - and perhaps papers over a few places where the world building is simplified to get the story to where it needs to go.
The character work is mostly very strong in this book. Ethan and Margaret, Bird’s parents, are both carefully drawn characters. We see them first through the eyes of their young son, adults, fully formed and set in their ways; later, when we hear their story in full, it is easy to see the line between the characters they really are and who Bird perceived them to be while still acknowledging the way a child’s view simplified them. Many other side characters - Sadie, Bird’s friend, one of the children taken from the home of parents deemed unfit to raise her; Domi, Margaret’s friend; the librarians who are the secret heroes of this world - come to life with only a few lines. By contrast, I have to say that Bird himself was the weakest character. In the early pages of the book, he comes across as extremely young - I was actually a little surprised to realize he was twelve, since his perspective seems to be one of someone who doesn’t understand what’s going on around him. And yet he accomplishes frankly incredible things on his journey to find his mother. It’s the kind of unlikely combination of innocence and extreme competence that you find in children’s books but it was a bit jarring in an adult novel.
The building of this alternative world is interesting. The world of PACT is one in which a devastating financial crisis, believed by some to have been instigated by China, leads to a huge uptick in anti-Asian sentiment in the US. While obviously this will resonate after COVID, there is a risk in telling a story about prejudice and injustice that relies on fictional events while set the real world, where real injustice still exists. In the early pages of the book, I was concerned that this new source of racism and fear would swamp the real experiences of a variety of people who experience prejudice in this world. But it is clear that Ng was aware of these concerns and wove them into her world. As the story continues, she ties the fictional events to the real-world history of racism, government persecution, and particularly the threat of taking children from “undesirable” families, whether that’s the existence of schools to reeducate indigenous children or the modern foster care system. There is clearly deep thought and a very realistic eye behind this story.
The book did not end as I expected it to but it did end powerfully, if in a quieter way. It was hopeful without being unrealistic, unsettling but also meaningful.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Abandonment, Racism, and Xenophobia
The world is built on racism and xenophobia, primarily against Asians and Asian-Americans. The plot involves a mother abandoning her child for his own good and the complex feelings that evokes.wistfulspirit's review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
sad
tense
4.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Xenophobia and Racism
kellyeweber's review against another edition
dark
emotional
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Racism, Racial slurs, and Abandonment
c_serpent's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Celeste Ng's writing remains delicious.
I loved how Ng handled familial love in this. In that same vein, I love that even though Bird's mother and father were separated, they were in love. I think it would have been easier to write tension and resentment in there, and Ng didn't, and I love her for that. Sometimes, people are in love, and circumstance doesn't destroy that.
I love that Ng touched on the tensions between Asian and Black communities historically in the USA. I found her world believable, maybe too believable, but her writing was beautiful beautiful. I wanted this book to end differently than it did. I like a story with a purely happy ending, which isn't what this was, although it remained hopeful, and for that it retains almost all stars.
One half star has been removed because ? It was very good, but it isn't a book I want to rate five stars, and these ratings are arbitrary. One star for yarn bombing, one star for Sadie, and two for Bird.
Total score: 4.5/5 stars
I loved how Ng handled familial love in this. In that same vein, I love that even though Bird's mother and father were separated, they were in love. I think it would have been easier to write tension and resentment in there, and Ng didn't, and I love her for that. Sometimes, people are in love, and circumstance doesn't destroy that.
I love that Ng touched on the tensions between Asian and Black communities historically in the USA. I found her world believable, maybe too believable, but her writing was beautiful beautiful. I wanted this book to end differently than it did. I like a story with a purely happy ending, which isn't what this was, although it remained hopeful, and for that it retains almost all stars.
One half star has been removed because ? It was very good, but it isn't a book I want to rate five stars, and these ratings are arbitrary. One star for yarn bombing, one star for Sadie, and two for Bird.
Total score: 4.5/5 stars
Content Warnings
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Hate crime, Racism, and Xenophobia
Moderate: Police brutality
Minor: Deportation
cocacolor's review against another edition
emotional
inspiring
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
This is a difficult book to review; I was unbelievably excited for it as soon as I heard of it, and certainly part of the disappointment comes from how high my expectations were. It's not Ng's best effort. It's almost too timely; I don't think it'll hold up as well 25 or even 5 years from now (depending on how the political climate goes). And it's a book whose reception depends on the reader being exactly as far left as Ng, and no more. This novel's audience seems to be speaking to a particular demographic, the comfortable "moderate, don't-do-politics" upper middle class, particularly Asian American members; there's an almost cloying expectation that you empathize with Margaret and Bird's discoveries of all that's wrong in the world, because you've gone through a similar wake-up call yourself recently.
Personally, as a Chinese American reader who's probably farther left than Ng, I found it embarrassing. Part of the novel still feels, to me, like an attempt to co-opt the suffering of Black and Indigenous communities, an almost childish, cynical attempt to insist, "Hey, Asian Americans have it bad, too, where's our solidarity?" Eventually my attitude toward the premise mellowed; Ng does make a good-faith effort to acknowledge that if the state using family separation as a tactic is news to you, that's willful blindness on your part, and to include the history of how this violence has been and is still being used against Black and Indigenous families, even if I don't think she goes far enough in that respect to really acknowledge who is actually being subjected to this tactic today.
Beyond the somewhat disrespectful nature of the premise, I found that Ng's writing suffered as well from its clumsy politics. There's none of the complexity of character from LITTLE FIRES EVERYWHERE or EVERYTHING I NEVER TOLD YOU here; The comes out of nowhere and feels like a cynical, clumsy shortcut to convey how bad the world has gotten--again, de-centering the Black and Indigenous women overwhelmingly affected by this kind of violence.
Still, Ng's half-hearted effort is beyond what most writers could achieve on their best day, and I don't want to hold Ng to a higher standard than I do her contemporaries; if I found OUR MISSING HEARTS to be clumsy or self-centered at times, I'd definitely feel the same and more of the vast majority of writers if they'd tried to write this novel. Her prose is as beautiful as ever, and understanding this novel is meant to be read as a fable about the power of art and narrative turns issues I'd had with the early parts of the book into unexpected joys. Overall, not as good as I hoped but not as bad as I feared. Still eagerly looking forward to Ng's next project.
Personally, as a Chinese American reader who's probably farther left than Ng, I found it embarrassing. Part of the novel still feels, to me, like an attempt to co-opt the suffering of Black and Indigenous communities, an almost childish, cynical attempt to insist, "Hey, Asian Americans have it bad, too, where's our solidarity?" Eventually my attitude toward the premise mellowed; Ng does make a good-faith effort to acknowledge that if the state using family separation as a tactic is news to you, that's willful blindness on your part, and to include the history of how this violence has been and is still being used against Black and Indigenous families, even if I don't think she goes far enough in that respect to really acknowledge who is actually being subjected to this tactic today.
Beyond the somewhat disrespectful nature of the premise, I found that Ng's writing suffered as well from its clumsy politics. There's none of the complexity of character from LITTLE FIRES EVERYWHERE or EVERYTHING I NEVER TOLD YOU here;
Spoiler
Bird and Margaret and Ethan are almost saintly, the resentments disappearing easily, seeming betrayals turning out to be partnership and devotion after all.Spoiler
sexual violence Margaret experiences at the hands of a copStill, Ng's half-hearted effort is beyond what most writers could achieve on their best day, and I don't want to hold Ng to a higher standard than I do her contemporaries; if I found OUR MISSING HEARTS to be clumsy or self-centered at times, I'd definitely feel the same and more of the vast majority of writers if they'd tried to write this novel. Her prose is as beautiful as ever, and understanding this novel is meant to be read as a fable about the power of art and narrative turns issues I'd had with the early parts of the book into unexpected joys. Overall, not as good as I hoped but not as bad as I feared. Still eagerly looking forward to Ng's next project.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Hate crime, Sexual violence, Animal cruelty, Racism, Racial slurs, Abandonment, Police brutality, and Rape
Moderate: Injury/injury detail, Pregnancy, Death of parent, and Misogyny
Minor: Child abuse and Bullying
Rape/sexual violence warning: