The design and UX isn't done, Rob and Abbie, okkurrrr! 😌
ohkaereads's review against another edition
dark
reflective
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
While this book has a plot, it does nothing but give the book a point. A point where to begin and a point where to end. A reason for the reader to keep reading. That's its whole purpose, right? Well, I say that because it would be wrong to say the book is a balanced mixture of both character and plot. If not for the gore, this novel could very well be classified as literary fiction or even, romance. The book is told in 3rd person by two people: Kaiser Brody, the cop who arrested Geo, and Georgina Shaw, the arrested. The two used to be best friends in a trio, their third, Angela, was killed in their teen years. Georgina knew who did it, but Kaiser didn't. Kaiser was in love with Georgina, and Georgina was in love with her murderous abusive grooming rapist boyfriend aka Angela's killer. These characters carry the book. If you don't like them, you won't like the book. I didn't like them, care for them or think much of them in all honesty. They were self-aware but stagnant. Georgina's chapters are riddled with “Angela's dead. I'm not. So this is why I deserve to live my life and be left alone.” monologues. Kaiser's chapters are filled with him being unprofessional, Georgina this & that, and the hint of ick where nerds grow up and suddenly feel tall and deserving of this & that. These two were just stuck with each other. Not even a proper conversation about their friend or past. The investigation stalled in the book's middle just so I had to suffer reading about them longing for each other and having sex (and in between two rape scenes, might I add, which is honestly the most jarring thing ever).
Albeit, the book had its moments. The past and present were woven well into the novel. The chapters and parts were organized rightfully. I also liked the small integration of music into the story, the lyrics toned well to the narrative beats. The story was immersive with the cinematic qualities of a lifetime movie. The exploration of an abusive relationship was decent. The “villain monologue” at the end was one of my most liked (up until the “shift/turning point”).
But I wasn't thrilled, I was disgusted. I finished the book because it was easier than not finishing it. The romance was ick, the characters were ick and the ending was ick. There were also instances of narrative fatphobia (fatness almost always linked to disgust or disliked characters) and the discussion/mentions of race left a bad taste in my mouth. ”But the woman standing in front of him is black, her skin the color of coffee with a few drops of cream,” is used as a description. I'm a black woman and that was a personal no for me. The story felt riddled with things like internalized misogyny because, for some reason, we are trying to justify why Geo deserved this and Angela deserved that and trauma porn. While it isn't exploitative, why is the reader subjected to three on-page rape scenes? Why is it one thing after another happening to Geo? And this also brings me back to the plot. It's a thriller. You would think the plot is the biggest part but that would mean the prison sequences were pointless. I get the characters needing to be humanized and solid but in hindsight, it was excessive. In the end, the book felt like a fluke. A plot so predictable it was annoying and this is coming from someone who likes linear stories (and spoilers and seeing right through stories — give me a plot, 50 or 60% in I know how it ends, how the puzzle fits). The story was not predictable in a fun way but rather in an I-can't-wait-to-be-finished-with-this-mess way. A book that might as well have been a novella. The story was a good in-between to kick me out of a slump but extremely disturbing. I spent most of the novel horrified but bemused. The novel had a tacky quality that caused me to inappropriately laugh at times. There were quite a few grammar errors as well but I wasn't too distracted by them.
Albeit, the book had its moments. The past and present were woven well into the novel. The chapters and parts were organized rightfully. I also liked the small integration of music into the story, the lyrics toned well to the narrative beats. The story was immersive with the cinematic qualities of a lifetime movie. The exploration of an abusive relationship was decent. The “villain monologue” at the end was one of my most liked (up until the “shift/turning point”).
But I wasn't thrilled, I was disgusted. I finished the book because it was easier than not finishing it. The romance was ick, the characters were ick and the ending was ick. There were also instances of narrative fatphobia (fatness almost always linked to disgust or disliked characters) and the discussion/mentions of race left a bad taste in my mouth. ”But the woman standing in front of him is black, her skin the color of coffee with a few drops of cream,” is used as a description. I'm a black woman and that was a personal no for me. The story felt riddled with things like internalized misogyny because, for some reason, we are trying to justify why Geo deserved this and Angela deserved that and trauma porn. While it isn't exploitative, why is the reader subjected to three on-page rape scenes? Why is it one thing after another happening to Geo? And this also brings me back to the plot. It's a thriller. You would think the plot is the biggest part but that would mean the prison sequences were pointless. I get the characters needing to be humanized and solid but in hindsight, it was excessive. In the end, the book felt like a fluke. A plot so predictable it was annoying and this is coming from someone who likes linear stories (and spoilers and seeing right through stories — give me a plot, 50 or 60% in I know how it ends, how the puzzle fits). The story was not predictable in a fun way but rather in an I-can't-wait-to-be-finished-with-this-mess way. A book that might as well have been a novella. The story was a good in-between to kick me out of a slump but extremely disturbing. I spent most of the novel horrified but bemused. The novel had a tacky quality that caused me to inappropriately laugh at times. There were quite a few grammar errors as well but I wasn't too distracted by them.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement, Death, Domestic abuse, Emotional abuse, Fatphobia, Forced institutionalization, Gore, Grief, Incest, Infidelity, Misogyny, Murder, Physical abuse, Sexual assault, Sexual harassment, Pregnancy, Rape, Sexual content, Violence, Adult/minor relationship, Bullying, Cancer, Gaslighting, Sexual violence, Toxic friendship, and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Cursing, Alcohol, Homophobia, and Vomit
Minor: Alcoholism, Car accident, Drug abuse, Addiction, Drug use, Infertility, Injury/Injury detail, Classism, Pedophilia, and Gun violence
The book has three on-page rape scenes (chapters 4, 22 & 24) and an on-page attempted rape (forcible incest, chapter 32 and 33). Forced institutionalization refers to the fmc's time in jail; there is no admittance to any facility based on psychiatry in the novel. Injury/injury detail refers to aspects of the murders (not considered torture since they are not prolonged) and a victim's loved one's anxious and intense fingernail biting. There is only one instance of gun usage, at the book's end, but there are a few mentions of the weapon weaved throughout the book.hanndiane's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Body horror, Eating disorder, Murder, Gore, Child death, Death of parent, and Sexual assault
Moderate: Abortion, Pregnancy, Sexual assault, Pedophilia, Vomit, Sexual violence, Toxic relationship, Terminal illness, and Rape
Minor: Grief, Cursing, Child abuse, Death of parent, Death, Infertility, Drug use, and Eating disorder
kaelizaco's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Confinement, Domestic abuse, Rape, Child death, Alcohol, Gun violence, Injury/Injury detail, Sexual assault, Vomit, Forced institutionalization, Murder, Emotional abuse, Abortion, Physical abuse, Toxic relationship, Grief, Pregnancy, Abandonment, Death, Death of parent, and Drug use
kaela_arcuri's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder, Adult/minor relationship, Body horror, Violence, Rape, and Alcohol
Moderate: Incest, Terminal illness, and Drug use
lindavs22's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Rape, Sexual violence, Sexual assault, Murder, Sexual content, Cursing, Violence, Blood, and Gore
Moderate: Grief, Confinement, and Child death
Minor: Alcohol, Alcoholism, Domestic abuse, Drug use, Toxic friendship, Death of parent, Vomit, Physical abuse, Gun violence, Incest, Car accident, Child abuse, Abortion, Blood, Pedophilia, Toxic relationship, Body shaming, Cancer, Infertility, Pregnancy, and Suicidal thoughts
phantasmaboo's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Jar of Hearts by Jennifer Hillier is a dark thriller revolving around a set of serial killings in the Pacific Northwest. The story opens with Georgina (Geo) Shaw being sent to prison for assisting in the murder of her friend, Angela Wong. Geo has cut a deal with the district attorney's office to testify against her boyfriend Calvin, who is accused of being a serial murderer. Upon her release, however, new murders begin happening with the same M.O. as Calvin's, leading to significant questions about who killed Angela and who is continuing this serial killer's legacy.
I have some pretty mixed feelings about this book. First and foremost, there are serious trigger warnings for multiple, graphic sexual assaults (of minors!) throughout the novel as well as incest and domestic abuse. All this leads to a very dark plot that is very likely not something for everyone, so be careful while reading.
Breaking down my feelings, I thought the following:
The Setting
I enjoyed the setting of a somewhat remote area near a city, but not quite part of it. I thought that the small-town feel gave the story a dark atmosphere as well as built up tension regarding who is currently doing what to and with who.
The Plot
I cannot figure out why the author included the first 1/3 of the book at all. This portion describes Geo's time behind bars, but doesn't really add much to the story that could not have been handled had it not been there at all. The majority of the plot lines that begin in this area are not resolved or are resolved quickly with little buy in. Honestly, by the end it felt more like the author wanted us to see Geo traumatized in this setting before moving her home, so that the trauma could aid in "character development" (more on that under characters).
For the overall plot, I thought that it was okay. I would say that the ending is indeed a surprise, but only because the threads are not laid out for the ending to happen until the very last chapters. The ending itself felt pretty anti-climactic, however, and it left me scratching my head as to what the point of this story was. It was definitely more of a "tell" experience than a "show" experience.
The Characters
The characters are generally well-developed, but I do think that it fell into the realm of stereotypes at times. For example, nearly all the female characters are shaped through their traumas, typically sexual abuse, rape, drug use, domestic violence, abandonment, etc. By the end, I don't think there was one woman who was not defined by one of those things. Geo herself is shaped by them. Even one male character is completely defined by his traumas. These events become their entire personalities and character arcs. I felt like there was very little character building outside of the traumatic, and at some points it just felt like trauma porn.
Another thing that didn't sit right with me was the author's depiction of victims of domestic violence, assault, and rape. It seems that she paints these individuals in negative light, casting them as manipulative and not to be trusted. I got the feeling that Hillier felt that she was being dark and edgy in these portrayals, but ultimately just created stereotypical, surface-like characters that fail to develop.
As far as diversity goes, sure, the characters were diverse, but very little is done with their diversity other than point it out. The main character is mixed race, but other than telling us that, there is very little influence on the plot. With the exception of the jail portion, there is no talk that I can remember about how race could have influenced the events of the book.
Overall
Like I said, I didn't dislike this book, but I wouldn't put it on the top of my list either. I personally wouldn't want to read it again because of the graphic sexual assaults of minors and adults portrayed and how those individuals are treated in the writing.
I have some pretty mixed feelings about this book. First and foremost, there are serious trigger warnings for multiple, graphic sexual assaults (of minors!) throughout the novel as well as incest and domestic abuse. All this leads to a very dark plot that is very likely not something for everyone, so be careful while reading.
Breaking down my feelings, I thought the following:
The Setting
I enjoyed the setting of a somewhat remote area near a city, but not quite part of it. I thought that the small-town feel gave the story a dark atmosphere as well as built up tension regarding who is currently doing what to and with who.
The Plot
I cannot figure out why the author included the first 1/3 of the book at all. This portion describes Geo's time behind bars, but doesn't really add much to the story that could not have been handled had it not been there at all. The majority of the plot lines that begin in this area are not resolved or are resolved quickly with little buy in. Honestly, by the end it felt more like the author wanted us to see Geo traumatized in this setting before moving her home, so that the trauma could aid in "character development" (more on that under characters).
For the overall plot, I thought that it was okay. I would say that the ending is indeed a surprise, but only because the threads are not laid out for the ending to happen until the very last chapters. The ending itself felt pretty anti-climactic, however, and it left me scratching my head as to what the point of this story was. It was definitely more of a "tell" experience than a "show" experience.
The Characters
The characters are generally well-developed, but I do think that it fell into the realm of stereotypes at times. For example, nearly all the female characters are shaped through their traumas, typically sexual abuse, rape, drug use, domestic violence, abandonment, etc. By the end, I don't think there was one woman who was not defined by one of those things. Geo herself is shaped by them. Even one male character is completely defined by his traumas. These events become their entire personalities and character arcs. I felt like there was very little character building outside of the traumatic, and at some points it just felt like trauma porn.
Another thing that didn't sit right with me was the author's depiction of victims of domestic violence, assault, and rape. It seems that she paints these individuals in negative light, casting them as manipulative and not to be trusted. I got the feeling that Hillier felt that she was being dark and edgy in these portrayals, but ultimately just created stereotypical, surface-like characters that fail to develop.
As far as diversity goes, sure, the characters were diverse, but very little is done with their diversity other than point it out. The main character is mixed race, but other than telling us that, there is very little influence on the plot. With the exception of the jail portion, there is no talk that I can remember about how race could have influenced the events of the book.
Overall
Like I said, I didn't dislike this book, but I wouldn't put it on the top of my list either. I personally wouldn't want to read it again because of the graphic sexual assaults of minors and adults portrayed and how those individuals are treated in the writing.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual content, Death, Child abuse, Murder, Rape, Pedophilia, Pregnancy, and Sexual violence
Moderate: Child death and Child abuse
Minor: Drug use, Emotional abuse, Racism, Drug abuse, and Infertility
silver_lining125's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Content Warnings
Graphic: Child death, Death, and Murder
Moderate: Cancer and Death of parent
Minor: Child abuse, Infertility, Gun violence, Infidelity, Adult/minor relationship, Car accident, and Drug use
cady_sass's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Well, I started this in an attempt to get out of a reading slump and it most definitely did the job. Nearly every twist had my jaw on the floor. This is a tough read, lots of really heavy topics and grisly imagery, but that ending takes the cake. I feel more than a bit torn by the final conclusion, not sure how I feel about it or how I *should* feel. There are some highly problematic assumptions and implications here… i so badly wanted to give this 4 stars but i just CAN’T because of that ending. The story as a whole, though, very well done.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Blood, Rape, Vomit, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Adult/minor relationship, Toxic relationship, Violence, Abandonment, Alcohol, Cancer, Child death, Murder, and Death
Moderate: Alcoholism, Body shaming, Bullying, Infertility, Infidelity, Cursing, Death of parent, Drug abuse, Drug use, Addiction, Car accident, Pedophilia, and Pregnancy
toofondofbooks_'s review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I think this was a great thriller, there's really no doubt about that. Jennifer Hillier is a great storyteller with a gripping writing style and throughout this book she uses a dual timeline in a really effective and creative way. I thought the story in general was original and horrifying and I enjoyed the use of symbolism throughout. I also liked the twist, even though I did guess it, because I think that me being able to figure out a twist means that the groundwork in the thriller has been laid properly. I find that often when twists come out of left field, they are the twists that don't make sense. This one definitely did.
WARNING: HELLA SPOILERS AHEAD
I did have issues with this one though, which what holds me back from giving it a perfect rating. I don't know if this is something that runs through all of JH's work, but there was so much fatphobia. Now, if the characters were just fatphobic, that would be one thing. Characters aren't perfect and they shouldn't be. Things like Angela saying "your thighs are getting fat" did not bother me because that felt like something that character would say - she's a teenage girl in the year 2000 when diet culture is thriving, of course she would say that. What I had a problem with was when characters in the narrative were endlessly described as these fat, disgusting creatures. There is a character in the beginning of the book, Bernadette/Bernie who is in prison with Georgina (Geo) our protagonist, she is framed as an antagonist and does undeniably terrible things to Geo, including literally raping her, and instead of her horrible traits being focused on...the narrative chooses to focus on how fat the character is. It's....gross. It was really distracting for me.
This leads me into my next problem - queer characters or characters who might be queer are framed in such a negative light throughout this whole book. There is Bernie, who is predatory and a prison rapist (which is not to say that lgbt+ people can't be rapists, but this isn't the kind of representation I want to see, there are enough people calling this community rapists, thanks). There is also another character who goes to high school with Geo and Angela who is a football player. I can't remember his name, but anyway, he might be gay, and in order to keep himself from being suspected as gay, he says really disgusting stuff about having sex with Angela after she disappears, framing the one gay character who could possibly have a decent arc into a pretty terrible person...?
So, while I did really enjoy this, I believe that I have valid criticisms here and I really hope that these things aren't a common theme throughout JH's work because I really do like her writing. I'll give her another chance.
WARNING: HELLA SPOILERS AHEAD
I did have issues with this one though, which what holds me back from giving it a perfect rating. I don't know if this is something that runs through all of JH's work, but there was so much fatphobia. Now, if the characters were just fatphobic, that would be one thing. Characters aren't perfect and they shouldn't be. Things like Angela saying "your thighs are getting fat" did not bother me because that felt like something that character would say - she's a teenage girl in the year 2000 when diet culture is thriving, of course she would say that. What I had a problem with was when characters in the narrative were endlessly described as these fat, disgusting creatures. There is a character in the beginning of the book, Bernadette/Bernie who is in prison with Georgina (Geo) our protagonist, she is framed as an antagonist and does undeniably terrible things to Geo, including literally raping her, and instead of her horrible traits being focused on...the narrative chooses to focus on how fat the character is. It's....gross. It was really distracting for me.
This leads me into my next problem - queer characters or characters who might be queer are framed in such a negative light throughout this whole book. There is Bernie, who is predatory and a prison rapist (which is not to say that lgbt+ people can't be rapists, but this isn't the kind of representation I want to see, there are enough people calling this community rapists, thanks). There is also another character who goes to high school with Geo and Angela who is a football player. I can't remember his name, but anyway, he might be gay, and in order to keep himself from being suspected as gay, he says really disgusting stuff about having sex with Angela after she disappears, framing the one gay character who could possibly have a decent arc into a pretty terrible person...?
So, while I did really enjoy this, I believe that I have valid criticisms here and I really hope that these things aren't a common theme throughout JH's work because I really do like her writing. I'll give her another chance.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Lesbophobia, Emotional abuse, Homophobia, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, Body horror, Fatphobia, Murder, Abandonment, Domestic abuse, Violence, Rape, Pedophilia, Child abuse, Child death, Gore, Blood, Alcohol, Misogyny, Sexual content, Cancer, Drug use, Adult/minor relationship, Incest, and Gun violence
Moderate: Racism and Classism
bookishkels's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
🌟rating: 5 stars
📖genre: thriller / mystery
#️⃣pages: 311
✍🏼same author who wrote LITTLE SECRETS, CREEP, FREAK and THINGS WE DO IN THE DARK (pub date: 7/19/22)
“In every story, there’s a hero and villain. Sometimes one can be both.”
Angela, Geo, and Kaiser are the best of friends but then beautiful & popular high school girl, Angela Wong goes missing without trace. No one knows what happened until 14 years later where her remains are found behind Geo’s house. Geo now has successful job, a fiancé, and a bright future ahead of her until the past decided to come back to haunt her.
Buckle up, folks. You’re going to be in for one wild ride! This book was a definite page turner with so many twists & turns. Every time I thought I had it figured out, a new twist happens! This is definitely for those who love true crime or anything serial killer related. On the flip side, this is not for those for the faint of heart. There are gruesome, stomach churning, and raw moments that even made me question if I could handle it 😬 This was my first Jennifer Hillier book and it will definitely not be my last. 10/10 recommend!
⚠️TW: rape/sexual assault, murder, alcohol, drugs, violence, emotional & physical abuse, descriptions of crime scenes/corpses/dismemberment, infidelity
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder, Abortion, Alcohol, Child death, Infidelity, Violence, Rape, Sexual assault, Death, Domestic abuse, Drug use, Physical abuse, Infertility, and Vomit