Reviews

Flag in Exile by David Weber

disastrouspenguin's review

Go to review page

4.0

3.5 stars. Lost stars due to extended descriptions of politics and technicalities that made me start skimming, rather than reading, paragraphs and even pages. Otherwise another excellent story.

pjonsson's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

The series is back in shape after that horrible Field of Dishonor.

fryguy451's review

Go to review page

4.0

Excellent! Could not put it down.

lyrrael's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

In some ways, I think this book is just as strong as the first; death-rides meet politics. In others, I really think Harrington's becoming super-human, and it bugs me. Additionally, the Peep characters really gain some depth in this book, but I'm still sad to say that there isn't a lot to redeem the religious extremists that pit themselves against Harrington. I dunno why I'm so picky about villains that have something to redeem them; maybe it's just that I can't believe that anyone would truly be evil simply for evil's sake.

Good read either way.

jwels's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

These books get better and better. I'm more invested in the characters in every book. This book allowed me to look at religion and current events more deeply. In general Fantasy and SciFi have made me overall a more accepting person of all religions. However as this book delves into religious fanatics are a menace and a detriment to society.

_meltea_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

mjfmjfmjf's review

Go to review page

4.0

Busy and uneven book. And as a reread some parts were very difficult to read. And there is no question that Honor as the POV character is a much easier read than any of the bad guys being the POV character. And there was a lot less Navy battle. But still a good read, though a little less good. 3.5 of 5.

dorinlazar's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

There are two things happening in this story, and both of them are taking a long time to build up. First of all, Honor goes into exile, starts a new business building domes on Grayson, and everyone hates her for that except the people. At the same time, the French... I mean Haven attack two different systems so that they can attack Grayson without scouting first.

Since some religious nuts want to discredit and kill Harrington and they are fine with killing a ton of people, including some children. Funny enough, the author chooses to get rid of her bodyguards in a similar manner, probably bored with the concept that he created for the steadholder. I wonder if he'll remember that the steadholder *has* to have a bodyguard in the next book. Looking at the name, it looks like he doesn't.

Ok, so, the religious nuts take their sweet time, and try to kill her just a few seconds before the French attack. This is seriously slow-paced stuff, I mean the author fills a lot of pages with what he calls suspense and what I call complete boredom. The point of view of Haven is absolutely useless, it would've been a lot better to simply discard that insight in the mind of the Havenite fleet. Also, they are bad at scouting and information gathering.

When it comes to battles, Weber is obsessed with tonnage, klicks and gs and other things that are simply a bore to read. The final quarter of the book can be summed as „religious nuts try to kill Honor, they kill the high priest instead, Honor cuts the head of a guy, then she leads a fight where she's badly hurt, and quotes Clausewitz to justify a game of chicken”. By now, Honor is a casual killer, but hey, tradition and shit.

It's kind of a mess of a book, but honestly? It's a natural continuation of what Weber wrote so far, so I can't really hold it against him. The character is fine, but seriously, Weber writes himself in corners and he's bad at avoiding them. By now, Honor is the kick-ass-est officer in any fleet she goes in, and really, there's no place to climb. In book 1 she was a newly-minted captain, in book 5 she's an admiral of the fleet (albeit, a foreign fleet). That's a tough spot to be in. He still wrote at least 10 more books after this one.

The same goes for religious sentiment, and the quotation of that silly thing where „people killed themselves more in the name of religion”. No, they didn't. Caesar didn't go genocidal in the name of religion. Neither has Gengis-Khan. Nor Hitler. Nor Stalin. Anyway, Weber is an American and there's all kind of nuts there - he wrote this while the FBI was fighting at Waco, and finished it right before the Oklahoma bombings, so he gets a free pass for his short-sighted view on religion.

All in all, a mediocre book. Stuff happens, people get killed. The end.

westcoastchelle's review

Go to review page

5.0

Honor is a badass.

justafaerietayle's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0