Reviews tagging 'Kidnapping'

The Lost Symbol by Dan Brown

10 reviews

peachani's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

iris_jv's review

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

Imo the weakest of the three books in this series I’ve read thus far (Angels&Demons, Da Vinci Code).
Spoiler Most easy to figure the villain out, villain itself being a repulsive human, doing the most inhumane things. Also slightly more unbelievable/un-logical than the other two.
Not really hitting the spot that the others did for me. Will still read the remaining two though (Inferno, Origin)🙃.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ricksilva's review

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

This earns an extra star for Dan Brown's usual array of historical and architectural details. Beyond that it's pretty weak. Symbologist Robert Langdon is tricked into coming to Washington DC by a man who has kidnapped one of Langdon's best friends, a high ranking Freemason. The usual mayhem ensues, in the same kind of frantic race of chases and puzzle-solving that we see in the other entries in this series.

The pacing (another specialty of Brown; the entire novel takes place over twenty-four hours, aside from some flashbacks) is used to obscure a whole range of plot holes, eventually leading to a big disappointment of a climax, followed by about four more chapters of philosophical debate on hidden meanings in the Bible and the power of positive thinking. 

The noetic science that's a huge plot point in the story isn't really a science. It's repackaged new-age pseudoscience. The massive threat to national security that has the CIA involved in the case turns out to be
Spoiler a video that would be embarrassing to important politicians
, and it's never made clear why the villain waits to go forward with that part of his "evil" plan.

An early murder in the story, one of those "just to make sure everyone knows the villain is a really bad guy" killings reads like incel fanservice (the only things we know about the victim are that she's smart, she's overweight, and a computer nerd can't figure out why she possibly would have turned him down for a date).

Potentially world-changing discoveries that are referenced don't end up changing anything, and the story's teased revelations about the secrets of Freemasonry don't really amount to much in the way of revelations at all.

But I do now have some ideas of places I'd like to visit and take photos next time I'm in DC. So there's that.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

katrinarose's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark informative mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Exact same formula as his previous books except the stakes of this book were much lower and less thrilling than previous books. Entertaining nonetheless.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

marianneiriss's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark hopeful informative mysterious reflective tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

librariangeorgia's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

Out of the 3 books i've read so far, this is my 2nd favourite.

I loved the codebreaking side of the story and the little mysteries throughout the book. Again, like in ANGELS AND DEMONS, I didn't care for the religion elements.

There are 2 books left in this series but I feel like I may be getting bored of these books. I may have to take a break before picking up the next book.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lilybuddy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark informative mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

Oh jeez. I started this book for the 3rd time because I never understood it well and I hoped the new TV series would give me some handholds. It did! But the book is very different than the show. And quite a bit longer. With a lot of explanations. And more explanations. And expositions. Sometimes multiple times about the same thing.

Sometimes I just skipped entire paragraph because Langdon was waxing poetic about a building that didn't matter for the plot.

I get now why I could hardly follow it the first 2 times. I could barely follow it now. The story gets buried beneath the author's apparent need to prove how much research he did, which is an impressive amount, it has to be said. 

All in all, I'm glad I read it again but I'm less enthused than I thought I'd be.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emmiekay's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

It was a great easy read. The beginning did feel like the author was trying to become a Mason by kissing ass. The main character comes across so dumb it doesn't make sense why Peter Solomon thought he would be fit for solving the mystery. Katherine was the true hero and honestly the book would have been 4 stars if she was the protagonist. But overall I enjoyed it, the ending has stuck with me for a while awarding it 3 stars.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

meganpbennett's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous informative mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Much like The Da Vinci Code, The Lost Symbol follows Robert Langdon as he runs through a major capital city, expounding on symbology, trying to both solve a mystery and save someone's life. In this book, it's Washington, DC, and the secret society is the Masons.

The Lost Symbol isn't as good as The Da Vinci Code. It's a fast-paced run though the District, exposing Masonic symbols, and it's interesting enough to be a page turner, but the way everything falls together is a bit rushed. It doesn't have the smoothness of The Da Vinci Code

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sabrielsbell's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

3.75

This was a fun addition to this series but not my favorite of the bunch.  I enjoyed following along with the mysteries (as always) and the family plotline with Peter Solomon was really intriguing but I struggled with the conclusion its ambiguous nature.  The clues felt less solid and that was a struggle for me.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...