Reviews

Аркадия by Иън Пиърс, Iain Pears

dimch0o's review

Go to review page

5.0

Невероятна , само това мога да кажа за тази книга. Объркваща , изненадваща и просто финал , който те остава без думи страхотни.

sasper87's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

lwb's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

An intricate time-travel/alternative universe tale, well delivered.

lesserjoke's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This novel takes a little while to get going and clearly establish its plot, but it ends up as a mind-trip of the highest caliber. There are essentially three layers of reality that author Iain Pears is playing with here: 1) the twenty-third century, where a brilliant scientist flees her unscrupulous employers in the time machine she's created, 2) the 1960s, where she arrives to find a contemporary of Tolkien and Lewis writing his own pastoral fantasy world inspired by Shakespeare's comedies, and 3) that fictional land itself, which the inventor's device inadvertently manifests as a real place that people can visit. It's a bit like The Rise and Fall of D.O.D.O. crossed with something like Inkheart or Thursday Next, a spy thriller full of meta literary discussions and daft but fun time-travel paradoxes. I recommend it heartily, especially for fans of Steven Moffat's work on Doctor Who.

sticklecat's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

benegesserwitch's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cemoh's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

3.75

avesmaria's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Featureless writing, thoroughly bland characters, one good plot twist at the end. I can’t believe I got through this big book feeling like I didn’t really know about or care about any of the people in it. Also Anterwold has to be the most boring hypothetical alt-universe ever.

daxie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny hopeful mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

souldentist's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.25

Genre fiction written by a white dude from Oxford, for sure. The way Pears writes his women in this book is pretty gross - the mathematician character is literally mentally powered by hysteria and her motherly instincts, and the teen girl ends up just supporting a male character's redemption arc. 

"What if stories were literally real life" would have been a neat 500 word prompt for a grade schooler but it's groan-worthy by the end of Arcadia.