childdeirdre's review against another edition
3.0
This story stopped making sense halfway through and it carries a very unsettling sexism of the worst kind. But the whole thing is so bonkers and Tom Hiddleston's narration is so soothing, that I actually recommend it.
maggie73's review against another edition
3.0
Beautifully written but hated the set up and characters.
emmacb's review against another edition
challenging
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
I enjoyed this book at the start, but sort of lost it as I continued to read.
It feels like the sort of book where the author is reeeeeally trying to say something and either it's going over my head or i just straight up disagree.
Or both.
The book feels like a comment on humanity in a similar way to lord of the flies where it's not so much a comment on actual human behaviour as the author's cynical idea of human behaviour that maybe says more about them than it does about humans! Also I had some thoughts on the depiction of women - it wasn't great. OK bad... to a degree that had me wondering if this was all a meta-commentary on people's depiction of humans in literature because surely noone thinks that's actually how women (or men tbh) would behave in the scenarios described in the book.
It feels like the sort of book where the author is reeeeeally trying to say something and either it's going over my head or i just straight up disagree.
Or both.
The book feels like a comment on humanity in a similar way to lord of the flies where it's not so much a comment on actual human behaviour as the author's cynical idea of human behaviour that maybe says more about them than it does about humans! Also I had some thoughts on the depiction of women - it wasn't great. OK bad... to a degree that had me wondering if this was all a meta-commentary on people's depiction of humans in literature because surely noone thinks that's actually how women (or men tbh) would behave in the scenarios described in the book.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Violence and Alcohol
Moderate: Animal death, Incest, Sexual violence, Rape, Homophobia, Confinement, and Death
swiftiebookworm_16's review against another edition
adventurous
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
d_sebek's review against another edition
2.0
An interesting idea - a high-rise apartment becomes an enclosed society, pitting the different levels into societal classes where the upper floors wage war against the lower.
This is going to be a movie soon so hopefully the fundamental problems of character motivation and the "hypnotic" pull of the high-rise will be answered for. Overall the concept falls short, as the reader has to suspend the fundamental belief that residents would shut themselves in rather than seek assistance from the outside.
This is going to be a movie soon so hopefully the fundamental problems of character motivation and the "hypnotic" pull of the high-rise will be answered for. Overall the concept falls short, as the reader has to suspend the fundamental belief that residents would shut themselves in rather than seek assistance from the outside.
ohgeemikep's review against another edition
dark
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
bigbookslilreads's review against another edition
4.0
I was on the fence about this book's rating for reasons that I will elaborate on below. Nonetheless! This was a fine good read, tension-filled and action-packed. A bit gorey and definitely messed up, but I was always looking forward to picking up the audiobook (narrated by Tom Hiddleston by the way) and finding out what shenanigans the inhabitants of the high-rise would get into next.
This is a story of the fast degeneration of the human 'modern' condition when faced, in a limited space, with the anonymity, escapism and isolation that a 1000-apartment, 40-storey building provides. Is it realistic? I wouldn't say so. Is it predictable in its premise? If what you are predicting is violence, abuse and utter lunacy without consequences (for the most part), then yes. Is it still an interesting read? Definitely. Especially when infused with the psychological and physiological analysis provided by the author (through the descriptions or the characters).
The high-rise has been built as a wonder of modern architecture, that same one in the 70s that prized functionality and the rigid and "blocky" design of its buildings. People of medium-high incomes flock to the newly built high-rise, the first of many in the area, seeking to seize this modernity, as well as the opportunity for some distance and convenient independence that the high-rise - equipped with gym, grocery shop and every other possible service you can imagine - provides them. However, the seeming homogeneity of inhabitants disguises a class division imbued in the construction of the building itself, with the richer up top, and the larger and lower income households in the first floors. In the middle, an uncertain class emerges, and as conflicts escalate (*pun intended*) we see how each group is trying to break free of its shackles and, so doing, gives in to their most base, animalistic instincts.
We follow three POV characters, though their introduction and alternation in the audiobook was a bit sudden. Each one represents a "class" of the high-rise: Wylder, living on the lower floors who becomes obsessed with upscaling and moving "up" in life; Royal, the architect of the building living in a penthouse, who is conflicted between this degeneration occurring of his own doing, and the privileged position he can assume; and Laing, right in the middle and the most content and passive in his position.
I was expecting this to be a slow degeneration into madness, but it was not so. I was surprised by how quick conflicts started emerging. I am not sure if this is a detriment to the pacing, as it is a short book. However, I would've liked more of a slow burn, if I can use that term. It also didn't feel like there was a climax. Each chapter had its own conflict and because of that the story fell a bit into repetition. The ending resolution was a climax in itself, though I would say too quick to feel eventful.
The interaction between characters as well as the analysis of events throughout was the most interesting part for me. I was constantly on the edge of my seat, wondering how people would adapt, pull through, etc. Ballard is quite a good writer, and he was able to captivate me even though some events felt like repetitious violence. While some may wonder why people in the high-rise chose to stay when such horrible things were happening, I felt like Ballard did a good job in creating this atmosphere of intrigue and primitive wonder that the characters themselves couldn't help but be pulled into. They wanted to stay because they wanted to give in. And I was wondered right next to them. I mean, who doesn't want to see upper class people going at each others' throats? (*ahem* maybe more realistic than at first thought).
There is, however, a strong argument against this book, that even though I think it is partly excused, it makes for a very uncomfortable read. That is the depiction of women. They are portrayed as passive and are constant victims of abuse. I saw this as a way for Ballard to say that we have a long way to go to create a healthy and balanced society, as without consequences none of the men controlled their sexual and violent impulses. When I think of the ending, I can also see how Ballard tried to provide a message of "nothing like this can happen without consequence", but I think it was very much brushed off, so I wish he could've explored that aspect a bit more. He also fails to give us a female POV, which I feel could've enriched the story quite a bit, but tbh, I don't think he could have pulled it off. Because in the end, while I think he was purposeful in parts of his writing and story about violence against women, he was still very much fixated on sexual abuse, breasts, and "heavy loins" and men exposing themselves... So I chose to deduce a star from the rating because of this.
Overall, I really enjoyed stepping out of my comfort zone and picking this up. It was a quick, easy and enjoyable (if I dare use that term) read. Despite its more unrealistic aspects, it still provided me with some food for thought, and so I would recommend it.
This is a story of the fast degeneration of the human 'modern' condition when faced, in a limited space, with the anonymity, escapism and isolation that a 1000-apartment, 40-storey building provides. Is it realistic? I wouldn't say so. Is it predictable in its premise? If what you are predicting is violence, abuse and utter lunacy without consequences (for the most part), then yes. Is it still an interesting read? Definitely. Especially when infused with the psychological and physiological analysis provided by the author (through the descriptions or the characters).
The high-rise has been built as a wonder of modern architecture, that same one in the 70s that prized functionality and the rigid and "blocky" design of its buildings. People of medium-high incomes flock to the newly built high-rise, the first of many in the area, seeking to seize this modernity, as well as the opportunity for some distance and convenient independence that the high-rise - equipped with gym, grocery shop and every other possible service you can imagine - provides them. However, the seeming homogeneity of inhabitants disguises a class division imbued in the construction of the building itself, with the richer up top, and the larger and lower income households in the first floors. In the middle, an uncertain class emerges, and as conflicts escalate (*pun intended*) we see how each group is trying to break free of its shackles and, so doing, gives in to their most base, animalistic instincts.
We follow three POV characters, though their introduction and alternation in the audiobook was a bit sudden. Each one represents a "class" of the high-rise: Wylder, living on the lower floors who becomes obsessed with upscaling and moving "up" in life; Royal, the architect of the building living in a penthouse, who is conflicted between this degeneration occurring of his own doing, and the privileged position he can assume; and Laing, right in the middle and the most content and passive in his position.
I was expecting this to be a slow degeneration into madness, but it was not so. I was surprised by how quick conflicts started emerging. I am not sure if this is a detriment to the pacing, as it is a short book. However, I would've liked more of a slow burn, if I can use that term. It also didn't feel like there was a climax. Each chapter had its own conflict and because of that the story fell a bit into repetition. The ending resolution was a climax in itself, though I would say too quick to feel eventful.
The interaction between characters as well as the analysis of events throughout was the most interesting part for me. I was constantly on the edge of my seat, wondering how people would adapt, pull through, etc. Ballard is quite a good writer, and he was able to captivate me even though some events felt like repetitious violence. While some may wonder why people in the high-rise chose to stay when such horrible things were happening, I felt like Ballard did a good job in creating this atmosphere of intrigue and primitive wonder that the characters themselves couldn't help but be pulled into. They wanted to stay because they wanted to give in. And I was wondered right next to them. I mean, who doesn't want to see upper class people going at each others' throats? (*ahem* maybe more realistic than at first thought).
There is, however, a strong argument against this book, that even though I think it is partly excused, it makes for a very uncomfortable read. That is the depiction of women. They are portrayed as passive and are constant victims of abuse. I saw this as a way for Ballard to say that we have a long way to go to create a healthy and balanced society, as without consequences none of the men controlled their sexual and violent impulses. When I think of the ending, I can also see how Ballard tried to provide a message of "nothing like this can happen without consequence", but I think it was very much brushed off, so I wish he could've explored that aspect a bit more. He also fails to give us a female POV, which I feel could've enriched the story quite a bit, but tbh, I don't think he could have pulled it off. Because in the end, while I think he was purposeful in parts of his writing and story about violence against women, he was still very much fixated on sexual abuse, breasts, and "heavy loins" and men exposing themselves... So I chose to deduce a star from the rating because of this.
Overall, I really enjoyed stepping out of my comfort zone and picking this up. It was a quick, easy and enjoyable (if I dare use that term) read. Despite its more unrealistic aspects, it still provided me with some food for thought, and so I would recommend it.
sbarnes01346's review against another edition
3.0
What even was this. Genuinely (but in a good way. If you want a batshit story featuring people who eat dogs, this one’s as good as any - plus there’s a movie adaptation featuring Tom Hiddleston, so, you know, go wild)
jmullenbach's review against another edition
3.0
i think it’s a little blunt. i love the opening that’s reminiscent of 100 years of solitude. fitting because maybe 100 years of societal devolution occurs over a few months in this book, but i don’t think the causality is made quite clear. the setting is great, including the positioning of the building as one in a group of 5 all separated from each other, defeating the residential density purpose of a high rise building and further isolating it.
most of the meat of this book is in the first 40% i think, and the rest describes a chaotic situation that sort of arbitrarily escalates. charitably you can say that the residents are perversely drawn to this new society where boundaries are redrawn rather than the old one, but this isn’t illustrated or motivated super well. it’s fun enough to read. the symbolism and social satire is pretty blatant and remains relevant.
there are some interesting details at the end. in one a character, now living in a terribly difficult situation that he has still somehow grown accustomed to, fantasizes about it getting worse so he has something to strive for. the other is about gender and spoils the book :)
most of the meat of this book is in the first 40% i think, and the rest describes a chaotic situation that sort of arbitrarily escalates. charitably you can say that the residents are perversely drawn to this new society where boundaries are redrawn rather than the old one, but this isn’t illustrated or motivated super well. it’s fun enough to read. the symbolism and social satire is pretty blatant and remains relevant.
there are some interesting details at the end. in one a character, now living in a terribly difficult situation that he has still somehow grown accustomed to, fantasizes about it getting worse so he has something to strive for. the other is about gender and spoils the book :)
robs320's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5