Reviews

Royal by Danielle Steel

amgreene13's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Oh god what a terrible book. Great concept, but terribly written and a cheesy awful plot. Forced myself to finish it against my better judgement and it just kept getting worse and worse. Only gets 2 stars instead of 1 as I managed to actually finish it.

anaaa2c's review

Go to review page

challenging emotional lighthearted tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot

3.75

bargainsleuth's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

For this and other book reviews, visit www.bargain-sleuth.com

When I was in junior high and high school and college, I read a lot of Danielle Steel. After reading so many of them, I thought I could write them because they all seemed so formulaic. So I stopped reading them. (Yet, I continue to enjoy the formulaic Nancy Drew, so go figure). When I saw the title and description of Royal by Danielle Steel, I knew I had to check her out after all these years. A romance story loosely based on the Windsor family? Count me in!

From the publisher: “As the war rages on in the summer of 1943, causing massive destruction and widespread fear, the King and Queen choose to quietly send their youngest daughter, Princess Charlotte, to live with a trusted noble family in the country. Despite her fiery, headstrong nature, the princess’s fragile health poses far too great a risk for her to remain in war-torn London.

Third in line for the throne, seventeen year-old Charlotte reluctantly uses an alias upon her arrival in Yorkshire, her two guardians the only keepers of her true identity. In time, she settles comfortably into a life out of the spotlight, befriending a young evacuee and training with her cherished horse. But no one predicts that in the coming months she will fall deeply in love with her protectors’ son.

She longs for a normal life. Far from her parents, a tragic turn of events leaves an infant orphaned. Alone in the world, that child will be raised in the most humble circumstances by a modest stable manager and his wife. No one, not even she, knows of her lineage. But when a stack of hidden letters comes to light, a secret kept for nearly two decades finally surfaces, and a long lost princess emerges.”

Spoiler alerts!

The weird thing about Royal is that the blurb is only about the first 15-20% of the book. As mentioned in the blurb, an infant, Annie, is orphaned when Charlotte dies from childbirth. Charlotte's husband dies on the front lines, and then the Count and Countess with which she stayed with also die. The Countess never had the time to tell the royal family of the royal marriage and birth, since doing so in a letter could not be a very proper thing to do. Left at the estate are the servants, who did not know of the clandestine marriage of the princess and the count’s son. They think Annie is just one more bastard child born during the war. Another young lady, Lucy, had also been sent to the estate in the country to avoid the bombings in London, and she decides to take the baby and all the documents proving her royal parentage. No one stops her.

She returns home a “war widow” and eventually meets a man who marries her and has children of her own. But she keeps secret the identity of her oldest daughter, Annie. It is only on her deathbed that she reveals to her husband the truth about her daughter’s parentage.

By now, Charlotte’s oldest sister is Queen, and it’s Annie’s stepdad’s job to try and get a message to the queen about her niece. Through ingenuity he does it, and a meeting is arranged. The Queen and Queen Mother are gob-smacked because Annie looks so much like her mother, and they take copies of the documents saved all those years ago to verify her claims. When it is proved true, they welcome Annie into their world.

It’s then that the story starts to drag a little. Annie loves horse racing and is petite enough to be a jockey at a time when there were no female jockeys allowed. I love horse racing and watch the big 4 American races every year, but I just didn’t care about Annie’s career, which is odd, because I normally like stories where women break the glass ceiling. She’s fallen in love, but wants to put her career first for a year, to prove to herself she can compete with the men. Her beloved doesn’t believe her and breaks up with her. But since this is a Danielle Steel novel, you know that true love will prevail in the end.

I thought the story was compelling enough, but in need of a good editor. There’s repetition in paragraphs that got annoying after a while. Twice in one paragraph it is mentioned that “they hadn’t seen each other in a year” and then “it had been a year since they saw one another.” But I imagine it must be hard to be the editor of Danielle Steel books because she’s so uber-successful how can you critique her?

If you like the royals like I do and want a light, frothy romance, give this one a try. Not great literature, to be sure, but that’s to be expected from Steel.

annettefunnycello's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

terrible writing ... the mystery is that I read it all, so interested in Steel's massive allure and kept waiting for something -- anything -- to make the investment worthwhile. Even the fantasy wasn't worth it because every minute is predictable and poorly written.

mjhpjansen's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

In Royal maken we kennis met het Engelse koningshuis in de tweede wereldoorlog, maar niet precies hoe het in het echt is, al is Steel er vrij dichtbij gebleven.

De Koning en Koningin sturen hun jongste dochter Charlotte naar een bevriende graaf en gravin op het platteland om haar veilig te houden voor de bombardementen van Londen. Haar oudere zusters doen oorlogswerk, maar Charlotte heeft astma en is pas 17. De Koning en Koningin hopen zo ook een voorbeeld te geven zodat anderen ook hun kinderen naar het platteland sturen.
Charlotte is geliefd en een fervent paardrijdster. Ze wordt verliefd op de zoon des huizes.
Een tragedie zorgt ervoor dat een prinses nooit meer thuis komt.

Jaren later wordt door brieven en documenten ontdekt dat een schijnbaar gewoon meisje een koninklijke afkomst heeft, moeten fouten uit het verleden hersteld worden en veranderen levens ingrijpend.

Danielle Steel schreef 101 romans sinds haar debuut in 1973. Ze stond 390 weken met één titel in de bestsellerlijst en kwam daarmee in het Guinness book of records.
Ze heeft een duizelingwekkende 380 miljoen verdiend vermogen in de afgelopen decennia en 650 miljoen exemplaren van haar boeken verkocht. Dat maakt haar de onbetwiste koningin van de romantische literatuur. Toch had ik nooit eerder iets van haar gelezen. Vele van haar romans zijn verfilmd en die uitvoeringen waren favoriet bij mijn moeder maar dergelijke zoetsappige tranentrekkers gaven mij het idee dat het achterliggende boek mij dan ook niet kon bekoren. Hoe ik daar op terug kwam.

Danielle Steel heeft een geheel eigen stijl van schrijven. Waar de eerste pagina's mij nog niet echt grepen omdat de alwetende verteller ogenschijnlijk een onophoudelijke stroom van gebeurtenissen over de lezers uitstortte zonder echt diep te gaan, liet ik me al snel overrompelen door de sfeer van het verhaal en feit dat Steel veel aan de verbeelding over laat. Wat eerst een ietwat storend gebrek aan diepgang was, werd al snel een ontspannend cinematisch gevoel, alsof je naar een film zit te kijken, alleen dan niet de zoetsappige die mijn moeder zag, maar een beter geregisseerd epos, precies zoals ik ervan houd.

De snelheid waarmee gebeurtenissen elkaar opvolgden, het drama, de vele personages waar de alwetende verteller op inzoomde en waar je alles van zag zonder precies te weten hoe het echt voelde en wat ze echt dachten: het organiseerde zich al snel tot een goed lopend geheel wat leest als een trein. Een familie-epos wat zich over decennia uitspant en waarbij je het niet overal mee eens bent, maar je snapt het wel. Het drama, de menselijke fouten en de emoties komen binnen. Hoewel er hier en daar wat onmogelijkheden doorsijpelen zoals een extreem zware tweeling, is het nooit echt storend.

Na het lezen van 'Royal' is me duidelijk waar het bij Steel om gaat: Het wel en wee van meerdere generaties, veel drama en je bent zelf de regisseur van de film doordat niet alles uitgediept en voorgekauwd wordt. Je mag je eigen beeld vormen.
Hoewel ik hier niet elke keer voor zou kiezen, is deze vorm van vertellen heerlijk ontspannend en is er altijd wel het juiste moment en de juiste plek om van een van de vele Steels te genieten. Royal ademt historie en leest als een sprookje. Ik was aangenaam verrast.

amandazaccaro's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

d.s. is one of my favorite authors. Her books are familiar and easy to read. They’re like wrapping a blanket around yourself for a few hours and knowing that even when things are sad that in the end it’s going to be happy. She borrowed heavily from the Royal Family for this book, but did it in a way that keeps you engaged. I enjoyed the character of Annie and how she kept following her dream and stayed true to herself and her goals.

quintilivare's review

Go to review page

No character development. Repetitive writing. All tell, no show.

theavidreaderandbibliophile's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Royal by Danielle Steel is a book that drew me in right away. Princess Charlotte is seventeen when she is sent to Yorkshire for her health and safety. The owner’s have a handsome son who is the same age (you see where this is heading). The pair soon find themselves in a compromising situation. A baby ends up being raised by a housekeeper and a stable manager. The secret come to light forever altering people’s lives. Royal has Danielle Steel’s trademark writing style which makes her stories so easy to read. I liked the characters and the storyline. We get to see how family can help loved ones deal with grief and the intensity of love during war which will make people do things they would normally never think of doing. We also learn that it is important to fight for our dreams. There were some emotional moments in Royal that will have you searching for a hanky. Royal is a delightful escapist novel that I enjoyed from beginning to end.

dianashadel's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Not sure why this is getting such good ratings. The story introduces characters just to kill them off and moves on so quickly I didn’t have time to get to know those characters before I’m being carried on by the next. Felt like a reasonably good plot with bad writing.

tabithas's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful inspiring lighthearted reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.5

The storyline was intriguing, but this book was not well written