Scan barcode
chicken_pastabake's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Body horror, Death, Gore, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Cursing, Death, and Toxic friendship
Minor: Addiction, Animal death, Body shaming, Vomit, and Alcohol
izypup's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Cursing, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Homophobia, Suicidal thoughts, Blood, Grief, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Alcoholism, Animal death, Violence, Blood, Vomit, Stalking, and Murder
Minor: Body shaming, Fatphobia, Physical abuse, Excrement, Islamophobia, Kidnapping, and Fire/Fire injury
emmylgrajinski's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Death, Gore, Gun violence, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Violence
Minor: Fatphobia, Homophobia, Suicidal thoughts, and Vomit
gawdz0rz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
kinda feels like the book splits into two different books like halfway through?
author writes a little weird about women’s bodies. “he was smelling her cunt through a nose he knew to be smashed flat.” no he wasn’t. that’s not true.
some other thoughts:
the tie-in of black metal and the 90s church burnings in norway to the characters’ backgrounds was great. and luke pointing out the conflicting beliefs (different tattoos, getting sacrificed to what was believed a pagan god on an inverted cross, etc.) showed the timeline of some people in that same scene moving between satanism and paganism (or what is now called “odinism”), sincerity not required. and then there’s showing the bigoted beliefs of some in the black metal scene—burzum, for example, being one of the bands fenris listed, was founded by varg vikernes, a nazi. and that wasn’t the only nazi band listed.
finally, i’m not sure i like how the beast in the woods was kinda just brushed off as some random demon or “mother” or whatever, rather than something way more important to the story.
Graphic: Death, Gore, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Fatphobia, Misogyny, Torture, Grief, and Toxic friendship
Minor: Animal death, Homophobia, Suicidal thoughts, Xenophobia, and Vomit
asmei's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Ableism, Death, Gore, Misogyny, Suicidal thoughts, Torture, Violence, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Animal death, Homophobia, Vomit, Kidnapping, Religious bigotry, and Alcohol
charlieeee's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.0
Graphic: Death, Gore, and Blood
Moderate: Body shaming, Confinement, Cursing, Fatphobia, Hate crime, Homophobia, Sexism, Xenophobia, Islamophobia, Religious bigotry, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Panic attacks/disorders, Suicidal thoughts, Vomit, Kidnapping, and Alcohol
The first part was fabulous. Some really good examinations of people growing apart; philosophy of life (for male-socialised people anyway); it was tense and had some great metaphors and other strong writing. And then part two happened where I would have sworn I was reading a completely different book altogether! The metaphors were over the top, made no sense in the context of the scene and the characters were really stereotypical - and the less about ‘Surtr’ and the constant repetition about her breasts, body and ‘smell’ of her genitalia the better. Was so disappointed by part two. So so disappointed.tallesttrees's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Blood, Vomit, and Injury/Injury detail
nutmegandpumpkin's review against another edition
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Gore, Blood, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Vomit
sunduck's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Body horror, Body shaming, Bullying, Gore, Blood, Kidnapping, Grief, Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Animal death, Violence, Vomit, Stalking, and Murder
bugsoup's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Body horror, Gore, Violence, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Body shaming, Fatphobia, Vomit, and Murder
Minor: Addiction, Homophobia, Misogyny, Physical abuse, Antisemitism, Islamophobia, Religious bigotry, and Toxic friendship