Reviews with content warning for Emotional abuse - Penance

Reviews tagging 'Emotional abuse'

Penance by Eliza Clark

65 reviews

shrikesong's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Content Warnings

geraldine's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

picked this up because i read boy parts and liked the writing style well enough that i figured i would give her next book a go. and i liked her writing style here as well! i also liked this one better, for the record, even though it's a lot more complex. i do feel like i wanted to keep a little notebook with everyone's name and a basic summary because a few times i felt like i had forgotten who someone was, but this might just be a me problem. and by the end this was not an issue.

all other takes are spoilers from here-on out.

i hadn't remembered the synopsis when i checked out the library ebook, but the very beginning was promising to me, like the setup of the second release of a (fictional) true crime non-fiction book, i do like a commentary on true crime. and then imagine my surprise when i realized that it was not only this but specifically a commentary on serial killer fandom and RPF???????????????

i actually have a note in the kindle app on my phone (i read this on both physical kindle and phone app, for the record) from around the 57% mark when i realized she was drawing a direct parallel between what dolly was doing with her serial killer fanfiction and what alec was doing with his book. and for the record, i did think it worked.

my main complaint about this is the very end, that maybe she felt like she was being too subtle here? (she was not.) and then has that final interviewer sit down with alec and y'know... literally say out loud the thesis of the book. i feel like this was genuinely unnecessary! i don't think we needed that interview at all! i felt like the afterward up until that point, info from the editor explaining who was suing and why and who had complained etc, this was enough to get the point across. trust your readers to pick up on this even if you don't explicitly spell it out!

this also made me question one of the other things i thought i was picking up, like if she directly explained one of the things she was hinting at, does that mean that i was just reading into the other element i thought she was suggesting? or did she choose to leave that subtle and it was intended? because to me it also felt like alec was not only being voyeuristic and obsessing over the culprits here, but also that he is doing this to teenage girls, and there may be more to it than just this. he is a fifty year old man, obsessing about teenage girls.

he includes what heather says about dolly's father and the accusations that dolly refuted on the stand, and in his fanfiction moments he has other characters allude to the accusations being true, but then when heather explains what she saw, he defends dolly's father and directly compares himself to the father. with an example where he spends hours standing watching his daughter sleep. really wondered about this one for a while. perhaps i really am reading too much into it, but still.

that's all really. i thought she did a good job integrating like... i guess online and "fandom" concepts in a way that made sense for the story she was trying to tell. and not assuming that a random reader in a barnes & noble would automatically know what the term RPF meant.

anyway, vriska homestuck gets namedropped in this.

Content Warnings

tctimlin's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I may have to sit with this book for a while. The Irish bookseller in Foyles in London convinced my friend and I to buy this book. I started it on the plane, then put it down for a while. At points, I was feeling less than enthusiastic about the story - but I realized at the end that I had been missing the point. Written as a “true crime” deep dive into the torture and murder of a teenage girl by three of her classmates (also girls), this journalist narrator presents his story using podcasts, social media posts, interviews with friends and family of the victim and the perpetrators. He claims to be writing the “definitive” account of the murder -the one that will explain the why behind this horrific crime. But is that really what he’s doing? And who is true crime written for? Who does it benefit? Whose appetites does it satiate? An exploration into society’s fascination with crime, especially the most unimaginable crimes.

Content Warnings

pixylprincess's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.25

I really enjoyed this book. I always think about the ethical and moral dilemmas involving my own personal interest in true crime, and I love how this book approaches this topic.

As someone who consumes true crime media regularly, Clark really captured the true crime world perfectly. Annoying podcasters, dramatizing the facts to make them “more entertaining”, profiting from families who have suffered from the crime, and theorizing and connecting your own dots about other people’s lives whom you know nothing about. People who think “I could’ve saved them” and fantasize about serial killers. It’s all in this book.

The writing was gripping and the girls felt relatable, especially if you also lived through and experienced the tumblr era. I enjoyed the background of all of the relationships and seeing how exactly it got to such an escalated point.

Content Warnings

alexandra__rae's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

Content Warnings

kfergy's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Really interesting read, especially as someone who has dipped into the true crime genre but also feels an 'ick' about aspects of the rising interest and production within it. Excellent use of framing, given that the reader is told at the beginning that this is a sus publication. Made me glad I'm not in high school anymore and that Tumblr was in its infancy when I was.

Content Warnings