Scan barcode
dexkit10's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Mental illness, Suicide, Violence, Blood, Murder, and Schizophrenia/Psychosis
Moderate: Cursing, Homophobia, and Injury/Injury detail
madladhatter's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Cursing and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Drug abuse, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual content, and Kidnapping
gingertyperior's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Suicide
Moderate: Mental illness
Minor: Animal death
disnelyse's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Graphic: Death, Mental illness, and Violence
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders, Suicide, and Transphobia
courtwj's review against another edition
3.25
Moderate: Cursing, Deadnaming, Death, Gore, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Toxic relationship, Transphobia, Violence, Lesbophobia, and Injury/Injury detail
matcha_cat's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.0
Graphic: Sexual assault
Moderate: Mental illness, Violence, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Toxic friendship, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Death, Drug abuse, Misogyny, Suicide, Blood, Kidnapping, and Fire/Fire injury
heathengray's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
While being a little silly in homage to its Hanna Barbera roots, the book does attempt some realism, grounding the crew of the Mystery Machine in the real world. For example, one character cannot fly in a plane because they escaped jail, and airports use federal databases, but later the cops take the not-so-teenage detectives at their word with little evidence when
Otherwise I found the main characters a delight to be around, if a bit too Mary Sue, none of them excelling in life after their days of teenage adventure, but all of them well equipped to handle obstacles thrown at them. The antagonist disappointingly lacked any real motivation.
You may see other reviewers tag this book with
Moderate: Mental illness and Suicide
One of the characters spends his time at mental institutions, another kills themselves_readerfromtheblacklagoon_'s review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Bullying, Cursing, Death, Mental illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Violence, Blood, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, and Injury/Injury detail
brichneyfloss's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Death, Mental illness, and Murder
yoursam's review against another edition
2.5
"It was," he said. "Kerri, all we do is try to cope."
^ the only quote that i liked enough to jot down
an unfortunate let down. the amount of potential here was off the charts but it simply didn't deliver, and cantero's writing style certainly didn't help. the introductory chapters at the start had a very "a man wrote this" vibe that was hard to ignore, but we can close an eye to that, sort of.
the real problem here is the actual writing - cantero goes for something fast and quirky that works out maybe a handful of times in the whole novel. the paragraph to "script-style" back to paragraph certainly tries to do something but falls flat constantly, because there's simply no need for it. particular dialogue tags are favored over a simple "said" often enough that you can't not notice ("polled" comes to mind, for example). but above all is the similes. it is a ever constant waterfall of it, every other sentence if not every sentence. let your story breathe, man! everything is like something else, usually something Quirky or edgy or whatever the fuck. here's one of my own, it felt like being in a car with a kid who has yet to figure out the clutch. don't even get me started on the hair thing, i wanted to kill myself.
i didn't hate this novel but unfortunately the amount of stuff that i didn't enjoy far surpasses the things i did (namely the concept, the potential, the characters more or less).
there are missed opportunities everywhere here, mostly with nate and especially with peter and his situation (when i realized what i thought would happen didn't i sighed loud enough my mom asked me what was up lmao). there's loose ends and dropped foreshadowing, which i suppose makes it.... not... foreshadowing lmao and that's the part that infuriates me the most. i hate a book that disappoints.
nail in the coffin is 1) the
solid bones, really interesting dynamics between the gang, amazing concept and even better set up for the starting point. this story could have been great, all it needed was for someone else to be holding the pen.
i promise i'm not a hater lmao
Minor: Mental illness and Suicide
I also personally think there's something off about how the gay aspect was handled here but I can't quite put my finger on it. Also, general "a man definitely wrote this vibes" (as mentioned in the review) but there's no content warning tag for that lmao