Reviews with content warning for Violence - Meddling Kids

Scooby Doo meets HP Lovecraft. Sounds like it would be amazing. The story and the plot were both great! I liked the characters. I like their development throughout the book. I liked all the twists and turns the story took.

However, the writing style was just not for me.
It would move from normal narration into lines like from a play, even parts that had stage direction. At times, the humor didn't work for me. I would describe the writing style as quirky. Sometimes, that would lend itself to the story, but other times, it was just distracting. I switched to the audiobook, which worked better for this narration.

Content Warnings

maryconney's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Content Warnings

monarchbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I don't know what I was expecting going into this book but it was not what I got. Every page shocked me. A bit wordy and heavy on metaphors. Unexpected queer rep.

Content Warnings

sn8man's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

thelittleone's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark lighthearted mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

Very talented writer, and a great riff on Scooby Doo and Lovecraft with a few unique spins. I probably would have rated this higher if it weren’t for one thing: I cannot stand Andy.

As a take on Scooby Doo, most of the cast stays true to character as darker, more realistic versions of themselves haunted by a harrowing investigation in their teen years. However, the author combines Daphne and Velma into one character, named Kerri, and introduce Andy in Velma’s place.

Andy is introduced in a scene

fighting off multiple grown men twice her size in a bar fight with ease.

She’s capable of about doing anything to save the day,

as she “learned to fight” when training in the military for a year (which she ran away from). Also, she broke out of prison.

Look, I get the book is about Lovecraftian horrors and that requires me to suspend my disbelief a bit, but this gets into the territory of “look at my super cool original character” aka Mary Sue.

Also, there’s a coming of age story here about Andy, who is a non-binary lesbian, falling in love

with her childhood best friend, Kerri.

I am absolutely here for it, and at a high level I love it. There’s moments where it feels like a really candid take on the confusion about navigating the unknown between two young women who care immensely about each other. But, other times it absolutely gives “man writes lesbians” vibes.

When Andy confesses her feelings to Kerri, she tells her that she’s been “fantasizing” about her since she was 13 years old. If a man confessed his feelings to his childhood best friend and said he’s been “fantasizing” about her since he was 13 years old, she would probably be terrified and grossed out. But a woman says it and it’s okay? There’s also a scene where Andy forces a celebratory kiss onto Kerri when Kerri has already told Andy that she doesn’t like women and it just feels like a violation of Kerri’s autonomy.

Also, there’s a graphic scene early on in the book

where Kerri has a nightmare about being violently molested.

It feels really out of place from the rest of the book, and I just can’t help but think that a woman author would never include a scene like that in a book so why does a male author feel the need to do it?

Content Warnings