Reviews

Native Tongue by Suzette Haden Elgin

stellau's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

This was a very engaging and entertaining read. I found myself marveling at Elgin’s mind and not just because of her capacity for rich world-building. The characters developed in this book are so nuanced and well-observed(?)...Elgin made me feel like a good listener because she is a good storyteller. You find yourself wanting to drink up more of this novel, while also feeling satisfied at the end. I felt like a voyeur in the best way.
I really liked the narrative. It reflects on the power of image, communication, and language. I feel compelled to become more intentional and crafty in my communication and presentation.
My only wish is that I could immerse myself in their world through more of Elgin’s imagined “artifacts.”

irammy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous inspiring medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

I thoroughly enjoyed immersing myself into the world of this book. It really made me think about how language can impact society and behaviour, and vice versa. I'd definitely like to continue reading the trilogy.

noemilysclub's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

WOW I loved this so much! I read it all in one day, I couldn't stop! I think the male characters were actually VERY sympathetically written, considering the entire concept of the book is that women have been constitutionally lesser citizens for two centuries. Of course men would naturally think less of them in that situation, it's the entire point. That's the dystopia. I loved how Nazareth wasn't that 'likeable' of a character -- she had had awful things done to her, and she had good intent, but she wasn't the sort of super kind/giving/loving/selfless heroine that would be too easy to write here. I am going to start the second and third ones as soon as I can get my hands on them!

deep_red_rosie's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.25

anthea_june's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful inspiring reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

wakenda's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I really enjoyed this book, about a patriarchal society where women's rights have been taken away and a group of families of linguists teach their children to be native speakers of both Earth and Alien languages in order to be translators for humanity. I loved the combination of feminism, sci fi and linguistics, which is right up my alley, and I think the idea of creating a specifically feminine con lang for use in a sci fi universe (in contrast to something like Klingon) is neat. The ending was not very satisfying, since it focused on the government men instead of the linguist women who I'm a lot more invested in and didn't really wrap up anything, but it did make me want to go straight on to the next book, so that makes me just feel like it should be read as one big set.

However, if you read the kindle version and are reading the trilogy for the first time DO NOT read the afterword, which contains spoilers for the second book of the trilogy in the very first paragraph (and possibly more than that, but I stopped reading once I realized it was spoilery), which is incredibly bad form and should not have been published in book one without a warning. The preface is part of the novel, though, and you should definitely read that. I love the way the publication of the book itself (as described in the preface) is part of the fictional universe and it fit well with the way she opened each chapter with an excerpt from a primary document to establish and flesh out the world.

stelldichein's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark inspiring reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

5.0

jo_crescent's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional hopeful informative inspiring slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix

5.0

Worth 5 ⭐️ Not perfect but wonderful, amazing, chilling & inspiring. The wide & varied cast of women & men, all with distinctive personalities operating in the world Suzette Haden Elgin develops is absorbing & fascinating. How have I missed this classic previously?! I have some ideas about why this novel has faded out of the public awareness while The Handmaiden’s Tale has become a touchstone but there’s room for both. Read this now! You won’t regret the time & you’ll also learn a lot about the construction of language… and the power of old women to change the world 

lexish00's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Hello, do you like books about language? About women? About linguistics as a science? About resisting oppression? About secret societies? About murders? THIS IS THE BOOK FOR YOU. This is 1980's sci-fi with a feminist-bent and ALL LINGUIST CAST! Okay, not all linguist, but largely linguist, which was all I needed to be hooked; the rest was just extra.

But honestly this is a wonderful wonderful book. It turns many sci-fi tropes on their heads, and it has very sharp-witted prose. True, it is a product of its time and outdated in some ways, but what sci-fi isn't? That's part of the greatness of older sci-fi -- seeing what was thought and then what actually happened (and what still could).

The main criticism I've read is that this book is dry and spent too much time on exposition. I find this a very interesting critique as that is the way of much classic "hard" sci-fi, only this time the exposition is on certain social or "soft" sciences. I found it fascinating and thought-provoking and very much in line with what I'd expect from mid/late-20th-century sci-fi.

andreatufekcic's review

Go to review page

4.25

A work of 1980s feminist science fiction, so apply all the caveats and limitations that implies. Within that, it was a well sketched and uniquely frustrating narrative carried forward by the force of its characters. I also adore in-universe epigrams to start chapters, so points there as well.