Reviews

Never Did the Fire by Diamela Eltit

tronella's review

Go to review page

dark reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

amylureads's review

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

4.25

yew676's review

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

ihfdayton's review

Go to review page

5.0

Profoundly sad, yet one of the most rich and complex novels I’ve ever read. The themes are varied and deep, revolutionary, irreducible to aesthetics or myth-making. The writing itself, the technique, is frankly beautiful. Narration jumps tenses and topics without bucking the reader, a convincing rendering of one thinking and feeling on the page.

I would recommend this to anyone, but especially those looking for genuinely proletarian literature that features political content without limiting the characters by it.

alexkerner's review

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

clandestini's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional informative inspiring reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

emmyji's review

Go to review page

Boring

theovengan's review

Go to review page

  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

1.0

 'No, you say to me, that one's mine and you say it with a voice that is verging on entreaty, leave my body alone, I'm so tired, let me have some peace, at least let me keep this leg of mine that still belongs to me.' 

bitterandgrowinglemon's review

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.25

  • incredibly challenging read; complex jigsaw timeline told through jumbled narration 
  • this novel is so freaking dense, someone plz teach this woman how to and where to put an end to a sentence
  • frailty, guilt, grief, disillusionment, political fervour
  • bleak, ambiguous, infuriating ft cannot claim to understand any of it maybe should've read the translation diary Catching fire alongside it too
  • two unnamed characters, resentful of each other grapple with their past and try navigating life without the revolutionary action they used to be part of 
  • joined by loyalty rn rather than the love they used to have for one another 
  • bed symbolism: battleground accentuating the gulf that has grown between them but also a refuge from the world outside and around them 
  • cell symbolism: political and biological meaning used throughout 
  • stream of conscious narration, the woman's thought are incredibly jumbled 
  • story deliberately left unfinished? mimicking chile's current political history? absence of justice for innumerable crimes perpetrated by Pinochet’s regime/closure for the families of victims?
  • I get that the prose is both intense and circular so that it matches the claustrophobic confinement of their current lives, and the repetition of their daily routines, it's supposed to reflect their suffering
    • however all it did was bind the narrative in torturous language
  • the only breaks from this dense plot were unfortunately not really breaks - a rather scatalogical description of the woman’s duties as some form of home help; a fairly gruesome account of a traffic accident and equally gruesome one of a violent bank robbery ://

 The metaphors of cells and cramped quarters were repeated too frequently, personally imo there was no need for the novel to be this obtuse. In all honesty, I didn't really care for this book, it sent me into a massive reading slump months ago. I also think it is ridiculous that you'd need to read another book (a freaking translation diary!!!) alongside this one in order to actually understand it. Reading other reviews I stumbled upon this: 
"read the first 50 or so pages of the novel until the prose becomes too dense/tortuous to be enjoyable, then skip to the diary for light relief and then return to the novel at intervals" - Goodreads 
An actual reading strategy for this?? Sorry??? I get that sometimes reading the translator's notes and thought process can be very helpful in gaining a deeper understanding of the themes, the characters etc of a novel... But to read such notes to gain a basic comprehension/understanding of the novel in the first place? 
Yeah, no. If you're gonna read this, good luck, it gets 2.25 stars from me :I 

benparker18's review

Go to review page

emotional mysterious reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0