Reviews
The Ghost Map: A Street, an Epidemic and the Hidden Power of Urban Networks by Steven Johnson
kindlereads's review against another edition
4.0
Over all this was a very informative and interesting book. But because of some of the subject matter it tended to be rather dry. I'm glad I read it as it is an interesting conversation piece but it was dry.
aninoag's review against another edition
4.0
Not bad! Great way to tell the story, with helpful background on the urban planning and health conditions of the era. A bit tedious at times, which made it more difficult for me to finish.
lisa_berrones's review against another edition
3.0
A solid 3.5. But the epilogue, about how a virus is coming but don’t worry, our public health and vaccine programs will handle it quickly, hurts to read in 2020.
sarahcoller's review against another edition
2.0
I have mixed feelings about this one. I enjoyed the first part of the book, for the most part, when he was just talking history. Toward the end, and after the original source of the disease was revealed, it took an eye-rolling turn. I wish I would have just stopped after the history and skipped the global warming, fear mongering, and treatise on cities = good; country = ignorant people who can't stop having kids. (Dear author, I live in Arkansas by choice and am from Oregon by birth. I have 9 children. I'm also really smart. Sorry I don't fit your narrative.)
The author is a preachy humanist/environmentalist/atheist annoying pain in the &%#%@# so it's hard to take some of his future solution ideas very seriously. Just give me the facts...let me figure out my own response to them.
Hillbilly Me did manage to math enough to figure out that this epidemic was far, far worse than the one we're supposedly currently experiencing. The COVID death rate for England and Wales at the time of my figurin' was .00002%, while the rate for cholera was .0003%. Both are pretty miniscule, but one death is enough to investigate the cause and make reasonable and intelligent changes.
Regardless of my over the top, too personal feelings of dislike for the author, I love books like this that are chockfull of history. While I don't believe in macro-evolution, micro-evolution has always fascinated me. I found his ideas about inconsistencies among various cultures regarding alcohol adaptation/resistance especially interesting. I also had to chuckle at so much of the ignorant thinking in those days and wondered if the board of health was so worried about the air, why were they sending people in to so intimately investigate? When I read about the ignorance of past science, it makes me wonder how many of our fantastic and innovative ideas will one day be viewed as ignorant? Ha!
The author is a preachy humanist/environmentalist/atheist annoying pain in the &%#%@# so it's hard to take some of his future solution ideas very seriously. Just give me the facts...let me figure out my own response to them.
Hillbilly Me did manage to math enough to figure out that this epidemic was far, far worse than the one we're supposedly currently experiencing. The COVID death rate for England and Wales at the time of my figurin' was .00002%, while the rate for cholera was .0003%. Both are pretty miniscule, but one death is enough to investigate the cause and make reasonable and intelligent changes.
Regardless of my over the top, too personal feelings of dislike for the author, I love books like this that are chockfull of history. While I don't believe in macro-evolution, micro-evolution has always fascinated me. I found his ideas about inconsistencies among various cultures regarding alcohol adaptation/resistance especially interesting. I also had to chuckle at so much of the ignorant thinking in those days and wondered if the board of health was so worried about the air, why were they sending people in to so intimately investigate? When I read about the ignorance of past science, it makes me wonder how many of our fantastic and innovative ideas will one day be viewed as ignorant? Ha!
benyeagley's review against another edition
3.0
3.5 - great story, got repetitive about halfway through. And the epilogue was a pretty significant tangent, I enjoyed it but it felt totally separate from the book