cb1984's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

2.5

Eh. There's certainly a lot of information, but by the nature of it (the relationship between private spies and journalists) none of it seemed particularly exciting - the most interesting stuff (the Steele dossier) is very much public domain. The book basically asserts its theory (private spies and journalists have a relationship that is bad for the public) it doesn't go any further than just repeating that over and over again through examples. There's a brief afterword about how to address it that was more interesting than about half the book.

danielb's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative fast-paced

3.5

rmotti's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Weird book to read on holidays in Cyprus where 9 out of 10 people are Russian.

impending_feta's review

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

2.5

gotossmycausticsalad's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative

4.0

Easy to read and very compelling. I don't feel like it was in depth enough to have answered all my questions on the intersection between private spying and journalism, but it's definitely given me a broad enough look to want to read deeper on the subject. 

One small nitpick is that sometimes he'll throw in a random personal detail about someone he's talking negatively about in a professional light, which seems a bit unnecessary. I get that they're doing something shitty, I don't need the extra layer of character assassination too.
More...