Reviews

Guy Langman, Crime Scene Procrastinator by Josh Berk

badassbookbestie's review

Go to review page

4.0

Kept me laughing! A bit predictable, but it did not distract too much from the funny forensics story line.

kt01's review

Go to review page

1.0

Poorly written.

Contradicting details, weird pacing - the ā€˜murderā€™ doesnā€™t happen till 3/4 way through the book, red herring doesnā€™t even feel believable, main character tries to be funny but isnā€™t, and is super lazy, yet heā€™s supposed to be one of the top of his class - overall just comes across as annoying, the murder ends up being a suicide. Thereā€™s a large stretch made from coins being stolen (which the main character told the thief about anyway when he later says that he never tells people about it) to the thief being a blood crazed murderer hunting down the main character who then turns out to not be the thief and is actually the main characters brother and supposedly the nicest guy in NY, the actual thief just gives coins back and doesnā€™t face any consequences and as already said the red herring was laughable. And for a forensics squad it seems that all they learn about is how to take a fingerprint...thatā€™s it...

If itā€™s supposed to be a coming of age/contemporary story, donā€™t market it as a mystery...

This book annoyed me, thatā€™s the best way to sum it up. The only good thing about it is that I finished it, but I think that says more about me than it does about the book...

Plot/pacing = poor
Characters = poor
Humour = poor
Romance = poor
Detecting skills/mystery = poor

L **(1f but more frequency)
M *
S ** (vulgar jokes)

rebeccawolfe's review

Go to review page

5.0

"Some day this unpleasantness will just be an ant fart in the hurricane of history." Favorite quote from the book. Love this one! Funny funny funny. Unfortunately, not useful for booktalks because of the pervasive teen boy humor(your mother jokes, penis jokes, etc.). Not much of a mystery, but a great "regular guy" story. Kind of a John Green book that's not so self-consciously hip.

suzannedix's review

Go to review page

3.0

Was expecting something different. By the fifth chapter I was tired of the "boy" humor and what seemed to be a melodramatic plot. Summer is too short to stick with something I'm not enjoying.

boleary30's review

Go to review page

2.0

Good ending, bad book, tries way to hard to be a stream of consciousness book instead of just telling the story through his eyes

nerfherder86's review

Go to review page

4.0

Hilarious story of a slacker guy just trying to do as little as possible, and get over the loss of his dad at the same time. Guy joins his high school's CSI/Forensics Club but only because his best friend Anoop assures him it will help them impress the hot girls in the club. Guy's like, whatever dude. But he *is* interested in a cute girl in the club, so maybe...Guy's also hurting from the recent death of his dad, a man who was older than his mom and was married before. Guy discovers some things about his dad's past that surprise him, and when a student in a rival forensics club is found dead, Guy begins to suspect that the dead kid and his own father might have something in common. So he's going to try to use his newfound forensics skills to solve an actual murder. If the murderer doesn't find him first. On the surface this book sounds like a mystery, and it is, a little, but it's primarily a very funny story of a guy coping with the loss of his father in the only way he knows how. Guy worshipped his father and he tries to write a book of wise sayings of his father's, but he also learns some unsettling things about his dad's past that change the way he views him. The humor throughout is very funny but very coarse; lots of fart jokes and "potty" humor and gags that guys will love. For a high school main character, Guy is really more of an immature middle schooler at heart, which would make this a great recommendation for middle school boys to read--IF there weren't also a lot of swear words. I kept track as I listened to this on audio, and pretty much every swear word is in it! So, fair warning, if that sort of language bothers you. But if you can overlook the very realistic guy-speak, this is a very entertaining book.

nematome's review

Go to review page

2.0

Well, I made it to about 50%. I am so bummed about this one. After reading [b:The Dark Days of Hamburger Halpin|6435578|The Dark Days of Hamburger Halpin|Josh Berk|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1242955616s/6435578.jpg|6625130] I was so excited to get my hands on this early. But unfortunately, this does not live up to his first book. Where Will Halpin has depth, subtlety, and good humored self-deprecation (and yes, a few juvenile jokes), Guy Langman has none of the aboveā€¦except for the juvenile jokes. He has those in groan-inducing, schlocky abundance. The whole time I was reading this, I felt like I needed a guy behind me with a drum kit, doing that whole da-dun cha! sound effect.

Well, at least one thing can be said: this definitely isnā€™t just a rehash of the same character. Guy feels like a completely different and new person. Unfortunately, I just couldnā€™t tolerate him. Itā€™s not that I donā€™t like him; he just reminds me intensely of why Iā€™m glad that Iā€™ll never have sons. He makes me think of all those times that my girls and I have gone to public play areas, on the days when there are large crowds of boys there. They run around, screaming, pretending to shoot each other with finger-guns. And my girls are just standing there, looking confused and a bit condescending, like, ā€œReally? This is what they do for fun? Okayā€¦.ā€

Itā€™s not like I donā€™t enjoy the juvenile humor, either. I can honestly say that The Naked Gun 2 Ā½ is one of my favorite movies of all time. Seriously. But in this book, he has to explain every single joke to the point where itā€™s so transparent that itā€™s no longer just juvenile; itā€™s infantile.

And I was so pumped for the forensic science angle, but this book isnā€™t really about forensic science; itā€™s about crime solving: hunches, wild leaps, illogical gut feelings. Things which have no place in science. Things which are sometimes incorrectly associated with forensic science, and thus give forensic science the ā€œnot a real scienceā€ reputation.

So yeah, I wouldnā€™t recommend this. However, his first book is great. Please pick that one up instead!

Perfect Musical Pairing

Weezer ā€“ Beverly Hills

I used to love Weezer. Their first two albums are still good. But then they came out with thisā€¦thisā€¦crap. Repetitive, boringā€¦Hef in the video. Ugh.

dairyqueen84's review

Go to review page

3.0

Cute, funny guy read with well-drawn characters.

momentum262's review

Go to review page

2.0

This book lacked a decent climax/plot/thriller/mystery point. It was a lot of static storytelling with the biggest parts of the story occurring very close to the end, and thus wrapping up way to quickly. A slow build to a let down of the plot. It was enjoyable to listen to as an audiobook, but I probably would have abandoned it if I was physically reading it. The audiobook narrator was the huge win of this book for me.

akmargie's review

Go to review page

3.0

An interesting, mystery plot complete with forensics and a murder scene. Well developed characters and some funny moments although I feel the humor really favors male readers and I was a bit put off by some of it. You can only read so many "your mom" jokes before it gets old. One of those cases where the humor was definitely not written for me.