Take a photo of a barcode or cover
tkuras's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
Graphic: Child death, Sexual content, and Murder
jessthatch16's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
5.0
Graphic: Child abuse, Child death, Abortion, and Murder
Moderate: Sexual content
ironcheerio's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Child abuse, Child death, and Violence
Minor: Self harm and Suicidal thoughts
cassidylorene's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Child death, Death, Sexual content, Grief, and Murder
Moderate: Blood and Vomit
majacollberg's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.75
Graphic: Child death, Miscarriage, Sexual content, Abortion, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Child abuse, Cursing, Death, and Grief
Minor: Blood and Car accident
wonderbee's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
3.75
Moderate: Child abuse, Child death, Death, and Sexual content
katherina33's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
This eerie romantic thriller leaves shocked and intrigued. Very well written.
Graphic: Cursing, Death, Sexual content, and Blood
Moderate: Domestic abuse
Minor: Abortion
kelbelster's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Child abuse, Child death, Sexual content, and Murder
jefferz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.5
Do men really believe women are that obsessed with sex?
This is Hoover's own words near the novel's conclusion (also quite comical considering I am a cis man reader and reviewer negatively critiquing Verity’s adult content). There was certainly an intentional takeaway message about sex in Verity that could've been a great thematic moment, but Hoover's own writing and excessive sex-related thoughts in Lowen's perspective undermine that very statement. While I also went into Verity with a blank slate as to not let other reviewers influence my opinion, subsequent points highlighted certainly cast Verity (along with Hoover's other works) under a very different light. The lack of contraceptives explicitly written into the story, Verity's distaste for kids and failure to even consider medical a medical abortion, Lowen's abrupt 180 behavior between the first and second sex scene, I would be outright lying if I said something seems a little suspect. And while Verity does not have any outright sexual abuse or similar topics like some of Hoover's other more infamous novels, it does inadvertently have a form of domestic violence (even if the cause is potentially justified), parental abuse of children, not to mention the premise hinging around homewrecking and cheating. I personally do not mind if books incorporate these topics if they're utilized well for narrative purpose or for strong character development/reflection/introspection. However, there's none of that to be had here and all of these topics many readers would dub problematic are played for pure shock value and clickbait-style branding. While I was previously neutral on my opinion of Hoover's body of work and wouldn't pass judgement after reading only one novel, I can certainly understand the sentiment and reasoning of why many readers call out Hoover's writing for glorifying toxic relationships and profiting off controversial hype. Verity's twist-ending and Lowen’s last actions only further supports that statement.
Despite all the negative and polarizing drawbacks already discussed, some of it would be excusable if the writing was solid or possessed a bit of finesse. Unfortunately, Hoover's writing was anything but quality and further contributed to the underwhelming, unpleasant experience. While not inherently the worst thing I've read (contrary to other angry reviews), the writing style is simplistic at best, unintentionally funny and silly at worst. Perhaps I'm showing my age, but the style reminded me of mid 2010's long-form Tumblr-era storytelling, full of the same controversial tropes and possessing a very juvenile, fan-fiction type of tone (though to be fair to fanfiction, some stories are very well-written and developed). This is most noticeable when it comes to the character logic, numerous plot holes, and details that don’t make sense.
Lowen's impression of her agent flip-flopped constantly over the first 50 pages, the funniest being her offense that Corey did not ask her how she was after her mom passed away despite her avoiding social interaction and finding intrusions into her personal space annoying. She then complained about how Corey wants nothing from her except her money received for representing her (as her agent, that is his primary interest and job), not caring about her or helping her (even though he offered to connect her with a financial advisor and other resources that she promptly refused), and judged him for only wanting her for sex, despite her continuing to sleep with him for the exact same reason until she found out about his girlfriend. When Verity is writing and drafting ideas, she states that she wrote her notes on napkins, water-proof paper in the shower (what water-proof paper is and why she has it in the shower can be a whole other discussion on its own), and wrote possible character names in sharpie on her son's diaper while out and about. Why Verity has a sharpie available but doesn't have, say a smartphone with a notes or voice recorder app is beyond me (this is not historical fiction novel and takes place in the present per pop culture references). And plot twists involving Verity's lack of mental cognition make no sense and ping-pong between being Verity being fully comatose at times (her bed mechanically moving to relieve pressure points), to being physical in-tact but mentally impaired at other moments. Despite being mentally gone, her body can function enough to chew and eat but not enough to move her head on her own? Having had a relative that was mentally disabled due to drugs, leaving her in a child-like state and having another relative left in a paralyzed disabled state, this is NOT how either of these medical conditions work (a far better example of a partially impaired or mute focal character is Riley Sager’s The Only One Left). Furthermore, plot twists involving Verity's state towards the end of the novel have zero plausibility and are downright ridiculous from a medical or scientific standpoint. I originally thought Jeremy was drugging her to induce her comatose-like condition which would've made considerably more sense than what Hoover came up with. On top of that, the ending has so many plot holes, gaps in character logic (particularly those involving Verity and the open-ended miscommunication resolution with Jeremy) and unresolved details, there is so much going on and none of it is positive.
It goes without saying that I did not enjoy Verity at all. From overall weak writing, to questionable material played merely for entertaining shock value, to the numerous plot holes and poor character logic, I genuinely struggle to understand how so many readers love and rate this book so highly. I can see this potentially being an interesting introduction to thriller novels for readers new to the genre, the only way I can see a reader being able to overlook the story's numerous shortcomings, but the way the controversial material is executed makes it an even more off-putting recommendation to support. I honestly struggled with the rating for Verity as objectively I had it somewhere around a 2-3.5-star rating due to its compelling premise and ideas. However, when I reflect on how much I disliked reading this novel from start to finish and having read other books that incorporate these dark elements far more tastefully and effectively (see Matt Haig's The Possession of Mr. Cave for an intense yet thought-provoking novel about child abuse), I cannot rate Verity higher than 1.5 stars. The fact that Verity was also the best shot I had at enjoying one of Colleen Hoover's novels only proves that I'm far from the type of reader her books are written for and am once again at odds with booktok and influencers.
Graphic: Child abuse, Child death, Cursing, Death, Emotional abuse, Infidelity, Physical abuse, Sexual content, Toxic relationship, Violence, Vomit, Car accident, Abortion, and Murder
Moderate: Mental illness, Blood, Grief, Pregnancy, and Gaslighting
Minor: Vomit
rrileyt's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Sexual content, Car accident, and Suicide attempt