Scan barcode
leannanecdote's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Ableism, Animal death, Body horror, Bullying, Cancer, Child abuse, Child death, Chronic illness, Death, Fatphobia, Homophobia, Infidelity, Physical abuse, Suicide, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Violence, Xenophobia, Blood, Medical content, Grief, Death of parent, Murder, Abandonment, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism
art_books_chemistry's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.0
The first half of Magpie Murders by Anthony Horowitz is Magpie Murders by Alan Conway, the fictional author inside Horowitz's story. I liked it well enough, it felt like a mash-up of Sherlock Holmes and Hercule Poirot set post WWII. The real story, is actually set in the modern day and follows the editor of Conway's detective series because the last chapter of MM by Conway is actually missing (naturally).
The modern day half of the book feels even more derivative than the book inside the book. It's also wildly repetitive, I think we hear some of the same clues/information three times in some cases. Nothing about the storyline felt orignal, more like Horowitz took all his favorite red herrings and twists from the great classic detective stories, threw them in a pie, and baked them all together using Elmer's glue. Yep, purposefully picked the bad glue since the plot is weak and the solution is clear.
To add insult to injury, I was telling my husband about the book and he stopped and asked what the name was again because it sounded to him just like the Anthony Horowitz he read recently, The Word is Murder. I haven't read it so I can't draw the parallels but he said it was weirdly similar sounding. So not only is Horowitz derivative of the best classic detective novels, he's derivative of himself. Husband said the same about the second in the Hawthorne & Horowitz series and stopped reading them but he was disappointed because he loved the Alex Ryder books as a kid.
Graphic: Death and Violence
Minor: Homophobia
tiffthelibrarian's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
4.25
Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Death, Murder, and Fire/Fire injury
taural41's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Death and Blood
Moderate: Child abuse and Child death
Minor: Cursing and Sexual content
sarah_readz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Minor: Biphobia, Death, Sexism, Sexual violence, Suicide, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, Murder, Outing, and Classism
nzmerchant's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
Graphic: Death, Blood, and Murder
Minor: Infidelity
sdramm's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
3.5
Minor: Death, Suicide, and Blood
mariefennema's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Death and Death of parent
Moderate: Sexual content
junowo's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
I will say that the justification at the end for certain character’s actions fell a bit flat, but I was willing to suspend disbelief for the sake of the climax!
Graphic: Body shaming, Child death, Death, Fatphobia, Gore, Terminal illness, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Grief, Death of parent, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, and Classism
Moderate: Animal death, Cancer, and Car accident
renyoi's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.25
Graphic: Body shaming, Chronic illness, Death, Fatphobia, Suicide, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Xenophobia, and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Animal death
Minor: Ableism, Homophobia, and Misogyny