Reviews with content warning for Sexism - Vladimir

Reviews tagging 'Sexism'

Vladimir by Julia May Jonas

17 reviews

bronzeageholly's review against another edition

challenging dark emotional reflective tense medium-paced

3.75

Beginning:

The main character is entirely unlikeable, she has a pernicious inner monologue which makes for an interesting unreliable narrator. It was very intriguing but also painful to hear how her self-hatred is a knife that she twists into everyone around her without even realising.

I found all the characters very considered and real; I reflected a lot on the varying power dynamics in different relationships. You think that the book is focused on titular Vladimir, or maybe it is all about John (the husband on trial and ‘ruining her life’), but is it really about any man at all? Men appear in every rumination, but at the end of each point it is about women and how each perceive each other and themselves that she deeply cares about but can’t admit.

At many points, it was difficult to hear the main characters’ obsessive thoughts and archaic perspectives (especially around the women who had accused her husband), and, after a while, I became a bit bored of the sameness of it. But then the middle arrives.

Middle:

What a wild mid-life crisis. Didn’t want to put it down.

End:

I don’t think the ending was for me. The wrap-up did not feel like it pushed me as a reader, especially after such an incredible and intense middle. I felt it would have been better to be left on a cliff-hanger.

When Vladimir goes off in the kayak alone at night and John goes to bed in the cabin is where I think it should have ended. I wanted to be left with the mystery of whether anything would happen to Vladimir and how to case against John would go. I wanted to be able to reflect more on the characters and what I think they were portraying rather than be spoon-fed their futures.

If I were to read this book again, I think I would rather stop reading it around chapter 20.

Content Warnings

lovelymisanthrope's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? N/A
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I found a copy of this book at a Free Little Library and I was very excited to see what it was about.
"Vladimir" follows an unnamed female English professor during a highly turbulent time in her life. The professor's husband, also a professor, is about to face a trial because several women have come together to formally speak out against sexual advances made by him and his abuse of his position of power. Vladimir, a new professor to the university, has befriended him and our female protagonist has become enamored with Vladimir.
This story took me completely by surprise, and I really enjoyed every moment of it. There are definitely some difficult moments to read, but that is what made it all the more interesting to me.
There is a lot of commentary around the "me-too" movement because of the trial that is occurring in the story. The professor does not believe her husband did anything overtly wrong, which causes a lot of tension for her internally as well as between her and other characters. He may not have raped these women in the traditional sense, but he did use his position of power to get sexual favors. This consensus that this too is considered rape is difficult for the professor to understand because in her day that is not what rape was. Additionally, she knew about these relationships, and in some ways encouraged her husband to cheat, so she is really struggling to understand why this is such a big deal. I think this novel brings to light how older generations struggle with the "me-too" movement because to them, some of these cases are completely normalized. It does not make them right, but I think it helps us to approach this topic with more empathy.
The protagonist's infatuation with Vladimir is obsessive and a great parallel to what is occurring off the page with her husband. She objectifies Vladimir and stalks him. She becomes completely obsessed with him and wants to encourage an affair between the two of them to occur. It was unsettling, but a great reminder that women too can be just as inappropriate in their pursuits.
As a character, the protagonist was flawed deeply, but so interesting. I felt like most of the story was written as an inner monologue in her head, which differed greatly from what was happening off the page. Her perceptions about what people were doing and saying seemed so different from what we were actually reading on the page. She is unlikable, but almost relatable.
This novel remains in the gray area for the majority of the story, because the main point of view is very much in a gray area. This gave the novel an interesting blend of conflict and peace. The entire reading experience felt like we were moments away from a life-altering climax.
I do think the story ends up going off the rails a little bit at the end. It was entertaining to read, but it felt almost comical what events transpired. This also led to a resolution amongst the characters I am not sure I loved.
I am very excited to see what Julia May Jonas writes next.

Content Warnings

mariskybee's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark funny medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

A book about having sex and not having sex and how it fucks everything up.

Content Warnings

ivi_reads_books's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Even though I found the main female character unlikeable I was intruiged by her. Presenting as a woman with liberal values while secretly being quite conservative. It was an interesting insight into the mind of a woman who doesn't truely support other women.
Where the book lost me was about 3/4 of the way through when the plot and the main characters became unbelievable

Content Warnings

rainbowarpaint's review

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

Content Warnings

victaphone's review against another edition

Go to review page

sad tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

It felt like not much happened.

Content Warnings

issyd23's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional funny mysterious reflective relaxing sad tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Immensely captivating with a disappointing & rushed ending. Gives ‘I Love Dick’ by Chris Kraus energy 3❤️‍🔥

NB Personally disagreed with 90% of the protagonists’ thoughts & actions + her critiques of feminism, consent & cancel culture in a post me too era - but worth reading.

Content Warnings

just_one_more_paige's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

This is one of those books that caught enough low-key buzz upon publication to get me interested. I can’t say that it would have been enough to get me to pick it up without the ALC from Libro.fm on hand as well, so shoutout to them for that. And shoutout to me too, for fitting in this one last read of 2022. Haha.

Vladimir is narrated in whole by an unnamed MC, a middle-aged (ish) English professor at a small liberal arts college in New England somewhere. When numerous accusations of a sexual nature are brought against her husband by former students, she is faced with her own dilemmas: how (and if) she should stand by him, judgement and condemnation from her own daughter, and a conflation of her own guilt/accomplice with her husband’s from colleagues and students alike. This is all framed within her own inner turmoil over her body’s aging, expectations of women in the eye of the public, and a burgeoning sexual obsession with a new professor at the school, Vladimir, that is bright, burning, invasive, and potentially overtaking her ability to make rational decisions uncolored by that relationship.

Well, I want to begin by saying that I really don’t know how I felt about this book, and I took a lot of notes while readings, so this review may seem long and a little all over the place…maybe it’ll help me organize my feelings and I’ll have a better idea of where I stand at the end. Hopefully.

To start, let me just say that I was absolutely stunned, in the very good sense of that phrase, by the writing. Jones’ prose is academic in a way that is both compulsive and intellectual – a fine line to walk I think (I don’t often run into academic writing that feels this approachable). The narrator’s voice is incredibly sincere, in the “this sounds exactly like I’d imagine the inner thoughts of this person to be, in the intelligence, self-assuredness, worldliness *as well as* the contradictive, unsurity, self-denial and self-deception. I was fascinated by the detail in her fantasies (the more erotic and the completely mundane, both) and how they fed her budding obsession, helping her convince herself that so many steps she took were ok even when they were really, really not ok. And there was a rather interesting self-awareness of internalized sexism and fat phobic/unrealistic beauty standards, yet without any move that I can parse to attempt to address it past basic recognition of it. (To this point, there are visceral descriptions of everything, but especially her own body, where she is especially cruel about her age and herself.) Anyways, our narrator seems imminently proud/looking for applause for that simple acknowledgment alone. Not a positive trait, perhaps, but a recognizable one. Similarly relatable, and in a similarly depressing way, the juxtaposition of her elite education/position and the walking on eggshells and careful awareness and management of every word/action of being in the world as a female.

As far as the plot goes, my impression before starting was that the people accusing our MC’s husband were younger, and though there is for sure a power dynamics situation at play with a professor-student relationship, I was happy at least that all the women were college aged and therefore of legal age. Honestly, I had in my head that the titular Vladimir was a young student too, but, while almost 20 years younger than the MC, he was around 40, so a very mature age too. Overall, this was an unexpected plot point that really helped me “enjoy” this reading experience more and I was grateful for it. Anyways, for the majority of the novel, this obsession with Vladimir was one of internal lust, in the narrator’s mind only, and it was riveting to see how all-encompassing it become even “just” mentally. And then oooooof, when things take a turn into real life action and she makes a move, it felt super creepy, in a way that I don’t think it would have needed to be, if she’d gotten out of her head for a second. How she mentally justifies each step, or doesn’t because she doesn’t feel she needs to, is very disconcerting to read. But I will say, it was literarily interesting, in juxtaposition with what her husband is accused of/in a hearing for, as commentary on how the world perceives male versus female predators.

A few other themes were explored in depth as well, and were done in a way that combined nicely with the that that our MC is an English professor and, therefore, her narration includes many literary references and comparisons and analyses (though mostly short and quick and easy to follow or move past, if you want). A lot of these additional themes involved discussions who authors can/can’t (or should/shouldn’t) write from the perspective of, what is the role of taking advantage of your own or other people’s traumas to create great works of art, and an intriguing exploration of morality in art (does/should it exist within or outside the bounds of normal mortality). Jones mentions, through her MC’s voice, conversations with students about the use of racist/anti-feminist works, either to represent as a product of their time, to understand a period worldview, or as simply damaging/harmful. Where is the line and who decides? It was also nice to see her mention the ways different generations, especially Millennials and Gen Z, have forced new critiques and considerations on that front. And of course, she’d be remiss if she didn’t address individual agency versus unequal power, and how to balance them, in light of the accusations against her husband. Of note, nothing is necessarily preached or decided…just…questioned and explored conceptually.

And now we come to the crux of my issue with this novel…the ending. I just, I don’t know about it! There was a spectacular literal and figurative conflagration as a result of this kind of obsession. And I see how it’s used as a device within this context, and acts as a nod to a few great literary moments (from Bronte and du Maurier to name a couple), and I do appreciate (and it softens the blow of things) the self-recognition of the heavy-handedness of it all. But, really, but after the depth and complexity of each thought/fantasy prior, the abrupt change in tone and overall turn was…too jarring, too maladroit, and maybe too easy, for me.

Ugh, I think I’m just going to have to land middle-lane on this reading experience. The narrator was so deeply wrapped up in her own imagination/justifications/mind and I loved that. It took all the mundanity of life (and the ways we each try to deal with it) and threw it in shocking contrast to her fantasies (and later extreme actions) about Vladimir, in a way that was just mesmerizing. And yet after the final pages, I was left feeling like I was built up to expect something more than I got, as far as literary greatness. And I’m just having a tough time getting past that. If you had a different experience or take, I would love to hear it! And if you aren’t sure whether to try this one or not, the writing itself is worth giving it a try to see if you feel differently than me about how it wraps up.

"I still feel the thrill of excitement in a university library. I still feel the potentiality—the students working toward becoming something, the stretching, searching minds, the curiosities of what will become of oneself buzzing at the study tables and between the rows of books. I find being among all that to be far more energizing than an enclosed and solitary space. Here I feel as though I’m engaged in the knowledge project."

"People said this crop of youth was weak, but we knew differently. We knew they were so strong—so much stronger than us, and equipped with better weapons, more effective tactics. They brought us to our knees with their softness, their consistent demand for the consideration of their feelings—the way they could change all we thought would stay the same for the rest of our lives, be it stripping naked for male directors in undergraduate productions of The Bacchae, ignoring racist statements in supposedly great works of literature, or working for less when others were paid more. They had changed all that when we hadn’t been able to, and our only defense was to call them soft. "

"I understood not only the bonding that comes out of complaining but also the incredible sense of identity that comes with discovering why you think something is wrong. I wanted them to feel that fire, that was what college was for. They were enacting a right of all young people, unearthing what they felt were the systemic wrongs of the world."

"We had wanted to live unconventionally, in a new way, invented unto ourselves, and now I was playing the most timeworn part."

"We lit a couple of fires in unexpected places, but we weren’t willing to burn it all down."

Content Warnings

karenmariscalo's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

It presents the female character in an uncommon position

Content Warnings

itisnatal's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Content Warnings

More...