Scan barcode
luxxltyd's review against another edition
mysterious
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny, Sexism, and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Death and Suicide
raindrop_'s review against another edition
challenging
inspiring
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Se lee muy rápido tanto por la escritura en sí, como por las ganas de querer saber más.
Veo tres capas muy interesantes: la primera, aquella que corresponde a los ojos de Helmer. Me resulta desconcertante saber que hay personas que interpretan la historia desde un lugar muy parecido al suyo, pero al mismo tiempo no lo es en absoluto, por triste que resulte. La segunda que veo es la que se reconoce por el simple hecho de tener un mínimo de deconstrucción, y es la que creo que es más fácil de identificar. La tercera capa es aquella que pueden percibir quienes han vivido ciertas cosas en primera persona. El tipo de cosas que la mayor parte del tiempo ni te molestas en explicar porque te cansas de la invalidación de aquellas personas que tienen la suerte de no conocer los mecanismos de según qué sutilezas a veces no tan sutiles.
Si bien la conversación final no es perfecta, le falta poco. Absolutamente satisfactoria.
Veo tres capas muy interesantes: la primera, aquella que corresponde a los ojos de Helmer. Me resulta desconcertante saber que hay personas que interpretan la historia desde un lugar muy parecido al suyo, pero al mismo tiempo no lo es en absoluto, por triste que resulte. La segunda que veo es la que se reconoce por el simple hecho de tener un mínimo de deconstrucción, y es la que creo que es más fácil de identificar. La tercera capa es aquella que pueden percibir quienes han vivido ciertas cosas en primera persona. El tipo de cosas que la mayor parte del tiempo ni te molestas en explicar porque te cansas de la invalidación de aquellas personas que tienen la suerte de no conocer los mecanismos de según qué sutilezas a veces no tan sutiles.
Si bien la conversación final no es perfecta, le falta poco. Absolutamente satisfactoria.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Emotional abuse, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Gaslighting, Abandonment, Sexual harassment, and Classism
Moderate: Death and Suicidal thoughts
hjb_128's review against another edition
emotional
relaxing
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny, Sexism, and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Domestic abuse, Suicidal thoughts, and Terminal illness
Minor: Sexual harassment and Classism
shadow_cat94's review against another edition
emotional
hopeful
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
This play takes you through a woman's disillusionment in her marriage after her "act of pride" has come back to bite her as blackmail. Nora's eyes are opened to the belittling her husband constantly gives her, the lack of respect she receives, and how she's only appreciated for her looks rather than what she says or does for her family.
This play looks at what people are willing to do for their reputation, gender differences between men and women in the 1870s, deceit within values and how characters view it in a black/white or grey manner, love, and more.
This play looks at what people are willing to do for their reputation, gender differences between men and women in the 1870s, deceit within values and how characters view it in a black/white or grey manner, love, and more.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Suicide and Toxic relationship
Moderate: Suicidal thoughts and Abandonment
Minor: Terminal illness, Death of parent, and Classism
emily_ford16's review against another edition
challenging
funny
reflective
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Chronic illness, Misogyny, Toxic relationship, and Abandonment
Moderate: Domestic abuse and Emotional abuse
Minor: Incest
thorney's review against another edition
emotional
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Toxic relationship
Moderate: Child abuse, Domestic abuse, and Misogyny
sienna1508's review against another edition
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
I had to read this book for school, and I found it quite enjoyable - more than some other books for school 😅. I did kinda find the ending to be a bit confusing, but I will have to give it some more thought...
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny
Moderate: Toxic relationship and Death of parent
gkcnoble's review against another edition
dark
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
[Torvald] HELMER.
[following her]. Come, come, my little skylark must not droop her wings. What is this! Is my little squirrel out of temper? [Taking out his purse.] Nora, what do you think I have got here?
NORA.
[turning round quickly]. Money!
HELMER.
There you are. [Gives her some money.] Do you think I don’t know what a lot is wanted for housekeeping at Christmas-time?
NORA.
[counting]. Ten shillings—a pound—two pounds! Thank you, thank you, Torvald; that will keep me going for a long time.
HELMER. Indeed it must.
NORA.
Yes, yes, it will. But come here and let me show you what I have bought. And all so cheap! Look, here is a new suit for Ivar, and a sword; and a horse and a trumpet for Bob; and a doll and dolly’s bedstead for Emmy,—they are very plain, but anyway she will soon break them in pieces. And here are dress-lengths and handkerchiefs for the maids; old Anne ought really to have something better.
Pp 6
In A Doll’s House Ibsen explores the complexities of the Victorian era through Torvald and Nora Helmer’s porcelain marriage. Ibsen’s play serves as a brutal metaphor for the fragile nature of the Victorian patriarchal society, highlighting the constraints placed on women's autonomy. Ibsen red-flags the obstacles women face in surviving a legal system that predominantly favours men in areas such as marriage, divorce, financial control, and child custody. Nora, for instance, assumes the role of a brainless, superficial wife to meet her husband's expectations, all the while secretly borrowing money to maintain the family's financial stability. As expected, men are not exempted from the patriarchal belief system, which hinders individuals like Torvald from loving Nora as an equal. He diminishes Nora’s sex, labels her a ‘skylark’, a ‘squirrel’, and ‘sweet little spendthrift’, and then emotionally blackmails her when she points out his flaws. In Torvald’s eyes, Nora is both a pretty doll satisfying his caprices and a nail upholding the androcentric hierarchy. However, by the play's conclusion, Nora outwits Torvald, no longer allowing herself to be subjected to his tyranny.
Ibsen’s play embodies the ‘undomesticated’ spirit of renowned feminist and advocate of women's rights, Mary Wollstonecraft (1792), who once said: "I do not wish women to have power over men; but over themselves."
[following her]. Come, come, my little skylark must not droop her wings. What is this! Is my little squirrel out of temper? [Taking out his purse.] Nora, what do you think I have got here?
NORA.
[turning round quickly]. Money!
HELMER.
There you are. [Gives her some money.] Do you think I don’t know what a lot is wanted for housekeeping at Christmas-time?
NORA.
[counting]. Ten shillings—a pound—two pounds! Thank you, thank you, Torvald; that will keep me going for a long time.
HELMER. Indeed it must.
NORA.
Yes, yes, it will. But come here and let me show you what I have bought. And all so cheap! Look, here is a new suit for Ivar, and a sword; and a horse and a trumpet for Bob; and a doll and dolly’s bedstead for Emmy,—they are very plain, but anyway she will soon break them in pieces. And here are dress-lengths and handkerchiefs for the maids; old Anne ought really to have something better.
Pp 6
In A Doll’s House Ibsen explores the complexities of the Victorian era through Torvald and Nora Helmer’s porcelain marriage. Ibsen’s play serves as a brutal metaphor for the fragile nature of the Victorian patriarchal society, highlighting the constraints placed on women's autonomy. Ibsen red-flags the obstacles women face in surviving a legal system that predominantly favours men in areas such as marriage, divorce, financial control, and child custody. Nora, for instance, assumes the role of a brainless, superficial wife to meet her husband's expectations, all the while secretly borrowing money to maintain the family's financial stability. As expected, men are not exempted from the patriarchal belief system, which hinders individuals like Torvald from loving Nora as an equal. He diminishes Nora’s sex, labels her a ‘skylark’, a ‘squirrel’, and ‘sweet little spendthrift’, and then emotionally blackmails her when she points out his flaws. In Torvald’s eyes, Nora is both a pretty doll satisfying his caprices and a nail upholding the androcentric hierarchy. However, by the play's conclusion, Nora outwits Torvald, no longer allowing herself to be subjected to his tyranny.
Ibsen’s play embodies the ‘undomesticated’ spirit of renowned feminist and advocate of women's rights, Mary Wollstonecraft (1792), who once said: "I do not wish women to have power over men; but over themselves."
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death, Domestic abuse, Sexism, Toxic relationship, Grief, Gaslighting, and Classism
roxanne_beznosiuk's review against another edition
dark
hopeful
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Read it for school. Was rather enjoyable :3
Content Warnings
Moderate: Misogyny, Suicidal thoughts, Terminal illness, and Toxic relationship
Minor: Sexism, Sexual content, Sexual harassment, and Classism
booksanna's review against another edition
emotional
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
As someone who does not particularly consume Classical books for enjoyment, but for more knowledge, this book brought me neither. Although I loved the character plot and development in the book, I felt that the ending fell flat and undelivered the great meaning of realizing the purpose of your life. I did enjoy the lesson about staying true to yourself, however its delivery could be more skillfully explored. I also felt that the shortness of the book really limited the author’s ability to deliver the story to its full potential. Although I did enjoy reading this, it could have been executed better.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexism and Toxic relationship