Reviews

The Riddle-Master of Hed by Patricia A. McKillip

tstone's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

wyntercreations's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful inspiring medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

7hm's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Really easy read. Love the idea of a chosen one who wants to be a pacifist. 

alikatson's review against another edition

Go to review page

I remember thinking this book was amazing when I read it as a kid. To the re-read list!

forthirtydollarsnameawoman's review against another edition

Go to review page

I stayed for the mysterious undertones, before it turned out to be repetitive, convenient, and predictable.

The cover is most-likely whitewashing. I wonder if the siblings' blood ever plays a role in the trilogy/it turns out they are not related or if it continues in this post-race fashion (which would be awesome for fantasy imo, with mixed people not experiencing racism = true escapism). 

While some parts felt derivative, others were refreshing precursors to modern fantasy. Overall, not terrible, and I do love when characters have names like Deth, yet I do not have the patience to continue. 

humanignorance's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Unfinished at 44%, page 95. At nearly halfway through, I didn’t care about any of the characters. The attempts at world-building were weak in a world which sorely needed it, as there were many things introduced which were then not explained at all. The plot plodded along, with nothing interesting happening.

noblescavenger's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted medium-paced

4.25

ogreart's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Read June 1980.

aoosterwyk's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The jury is out on this one. I have ILLed the rest, but found the first to be somewhat thin. Sad, because I felt it had great potential.

superdaintycate's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

This was a challenging read. It's lovely writing, and so dense with not much contextual description that I found myself going back over sections to understand enough to move on with the plot. And even then I read most of it on faith that I would have a handle on the story by the end. I mostly did, and I'll read the rest, but I'm glad this wasn't my first encounter with McKillip.