Reviews tagging 'Xenophobia'

Historia naturalna smoków by Marie Brennan

18 reviews

aseel_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.75

This was excellent, I loved everything about it, I just looked very historical fantasy, especially with dragons 

I can't believe her husband died!! That was so heartbreaking, he was so good for her

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jess_always_reading's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No

4.5

A wonderful, cozy story filled with daring adventures, scientific discovery, and the mysteries of dragons. 

10/10 would recommend 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

theirgracegrace's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

If someone asked me if it were possible to simultaneously copy the Victorian memoir style and acknowledge the political and social culture that created it, I would ask if they liked dragons and hand them A Natural History of Dragons. Lady Isabella Amherst is a fascinating character as she tells the story decades later of her first expedition into the treacherous mountains of Vystrana in search of information about the biology of dragons. The split between the Isabella who is narrating the book and the Isabella we see in the narrative itself is astoundingly well-depicted, showing what decades of research and growth have given her over her younger counterpart. The care given to all aspects of the worldbuilding (religion, dragon and other creatures' biology, economics, politics, even language) creates an incredibly believable and lifelike setting. I cannot recommend this book enough!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

the_other_aenor's review against another edition

Go to review page

What the actual fuck is the reasoning behind making a whole new fantasy world, and then adding fucking racism and xenophobia to it??? Why would you do that? Even if you set it in our reality, but added dragons, there's 0 need to include as much blatant racism, classism, and xenophobia as this author did. Infuriating.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ember14's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

figsofpeach's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous informative medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

hebifry's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0

 Where to start... this book had all the promise in the world. Historical fiction with a fantasy twist. Feminist female lead defying expectations. Dragons, for Christ's sake. And yet it's a 2.5 for me (rounded down because it made me so irritated).

At first I was rooting for Lady Trent. She's tried to study dragons her whole life, it's clearly a passion that she can't ignore. But once she actually gets the opportunity, she is so insufferable that it's painful to read about. The majority of the book is not even about dragons, it's her issues with the villagers, an unfamiliar land, not being included as a woman, etc. And that would be all well and good if there was actually any growth there at all. But she doesn't grow even slightly! In fact, her arrogance continues to put people in danger until the very last page.

I went into this expecting something like Phyrne Fisher and got colonialist, priveleged, whiny British woman instead. The way she talks about the land she is a guest in and the villagers is guillotine worthy. She is constantly disrespecting them, insulting their culture, even ridiculing their religious leader in some instances. And this is where I felt that the realism was the most egregious. I understand the tone of the book, but it's for a modern audience. Do we as readers really want to root for someone as awful as Lady Isabella Camherst? If she had tried even slightly to show respect to them, it wouldn't have been such a dealbreaker, but from her first day, she just hates everything about it. She can't find a single thing or person that she likes in the entire village. Her older voice writing the story insists that she is simply naive but I can't imagine it improves much and even if it does, it should improve IN the first book. Long series are not an excuse for having zero character growth in your first book.

And if her aristocratic arrogance wasn't enough she also has so much internal misogyny, it was hard to read. A serious case of Not Like Other Girls syndrome. There is not a single female character (besides herself of course) that is shown to have a brain. Her mother is strict and catty, her maid is unfeeling and rude, her friend is frivolous and stupid, etc. She just hates every woman she meets for truly no reason.

If there's one positive, I would say that naturalist lens in viewing dragons was very inventive and well-written. Those were my favorite aspects of the book. I would not recommend this book but would love to see this idea explored elswhere.
 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

judassilver's review against another edition

Go to review page

This book did a couple things I didn't enjoy: the retrospective interjection of the narrator recalling past events (the "I may be old now..." or "though I didn't know it then" type) and the fantasy names for what is very clearly our modern world. Call an England an England, please, not "Scirland". Also please note that the memoir part of the title weighs much more heavily than the dragon part, this is very much the story of an upper class woman struggling to foster science minded interests in a world of Victorian sensibilities. Set your expectations accordingly. (Most of the dragons featured are dead, suffering captivity, or being hunted. The MC also has some very classist and colonialist beliefs). This book (and series) is well written and definitely has an audience, I just bounced hard off it. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

symmetra's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.25

Dagmira deserved better


But on a more serious note, just very dull, it is clearly inspired by Margaret Fountaine's adapted diaries, 'Love Among the Butterflies', and I would recommend you read that. Weirdly, Fountaine has a way more feminist start - she became independently wealthy when her father died so didn't need a husband to tag along - trying to avoid the class issue isn't a valid excuse because she was still upper class.

Structurally, this divides a memoir into a series format with an adventure per book, versus an adventure per chapter, and that just doesn't work. 

There's about as much examination of natural history's colonialism as in Fountaine's work, that is to say none. I think the choice to set it in fantasy-Siberia was an attempt to avoid it at least in this first book (I cannot comment on the sequels), despite the fact the Indigenous peoples of Siberia have similar histories of colonial oppression. I think the author intended the locals to be poor white Russians, as there would certainly be some, undertones, if one were to read them as Indigenous people. 

If you liked the setting and want a cool old timey lady who acknowledges colonialism, Ethel Lindgren's story is pretty cool; she was an anthropologist and refused to publish her PhD thesis on Indigenous Siberian religion due to the Soviet crackdowns on religion at the time. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

madzie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

Brennan mashes the voices of early English women writers like Austen and the Brontes with scientific notes and realistic fantasy. She excels at worldbuilding and seamlessly fits dragons into Victorian Europe. Her world of dragons is sensical and easy to follow. The dragons feel very real, and you can imagine being a part of this world. However, while Brennan thrives in her exploration of dragons, she leaves me questioning other parts of her world and how it differs from our own historical one. Often, Brennan's exploration of sexism is intriguing, as it is central to the story, but falls short, not incorporating the entire picture, even illustrating that women can only be strong if they show masculine traits, which seems to go against the same theme she is attempting to portray. Other themes follow suit, often making a good attempt at deep ideas but leaving me with questions about the whole picture, especially from a historical perspective.

However, Brennan creates a nicely written plot with a good twist at the end. Throughout, I got bored with the lack of details. Although seemingly purposeful due to attempting to draw in scientific writing, it leaves me again wanting more and never really feeling like part of the story. Perhaps more of a success is her incorporation of Victorian writing, which echoes history while still being accessible to modern audiences, as well as less pretentious. Occasionally, I felt the sentence variety was lacking, especially in action scenes. Lady Trent herself is an intriguing character, who did leave me feeling for her by the end of the novel. Overall, I felt like the book stayed in the middle ground, perhaps rising above for other readers, especially those more interested in scientific explanations and writings over story flow and details.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings