jacobbou's review against another edition
dark
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
beaukowski's review
3.0
Was very good then very bad also Mr Rojack is very unlikeable but not in a Patrick Bateman way but in a ‘this man is a walking ick’ kind of way
jackb_93's review against another edition
Brilliant, maddening, furious, frustrating. The epilogue is one of the best pieces of writing I've ever read
kasualobserver's review against another edition
5.0
An extraordinary novel, whose incredible power is hard to describe or explain. Like a impressionist painting - but a thousand times more violently - it directly addresses your emotions and bypasses your intellectual understanding of the text. It is a literary version of a good Tarantino movie, 40 years early. The violence and the sex are not pointless, they are geared to punching you in the stomach and making you react to the style of the book as strongly as the author wrote it.
Much of the story is purposefully unrealistic, incredible, over the top - clearly just a tool in the hand of the writer to make the book a weapon that he can strike you with - a way to imprint you, the reader, with raw emotions which no other book I have read was able to express with the same power.
Not a book that should be read by anyone younger than a mature teenager:-)
Much of the story is purposefully unrealistic, incredible, over the top - clearly just a tool in the hand of the writer to make the book a weapon that he can strike you with - a way to imprint you, the reader, with raw emotions which no other book I have read was able to express with the same power.
Not a book that should be read by anyone younger than a mature teenager:-)
oceanlistener's review against another edition
1.0
A woman writes about relationships and family, it's chick-lit.
Norman Mailer jerks off, leaves his mess all over paper, and we're supposed to call it literature? Rather, this book is the pinnacle of dick-lit: a genre referred to as "literature" by the establishment, but is actually male fantasy trash.
Norman Mailer jerks off, leaves his mess all over paper, and we're supposed to call it literature? Rather, this book is the pinnacle of dick-lit: a genre referred to as "literature" by the establishment, but is actually male fantasy trash.
bloomability47's review
2.0
Hypermasculinity, misogyny, and racism. It gets two stars for some pretty writing, though overall... Bullshit. Now to write a fucking essay on this asswash.
manavisharma's review against another edition
4.0
This book is incredibly insane! It's so fast paced and unreal that I simply could not put it down, yet, when I was done, I was left with thinking what really was that? I would recommend it but be prepared to just go on the ride, not yet and rationalize it.
eporter13's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
0fficialj0emama's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
yulelogue's review against another edition
2.0
Meh. I don't buy the "guy pulls shit out of his ass and gets away with it" narrative. Nor do I necessarily think that attractive people just start having sex, although I do think the overnight "we're in love; what do we do now?" thing can happen because every guy falls in love with women that have sex with them.