Reviews tagging 'Torture'

Cleanness by Garth Greenwell

2 reviews

remimicha's review against another edition

Go to review page

I’m incredibly concerned at the lack of content warnings on past reviews. The ones I saw when I started to get an ick feeling during the first chapter are entirely insufficient. For those of you going into this expecting a beautiful piece of literary fiction: Don’t.

I’m alarmed at the number of reviews that refer to a rape scene as a sex scene. If you are a survivor of trauma please tread with extreme caution. The content warnings I placed under explicit/graphic were entered intentionally. As I only made it to the end of the second chapter this is not an exhaustive list. I’ve included more information as a spoiler using specific lines from the book. 0/10 absolutely did not finish. 

Content warnings not included in the options:
Homophobic slurs, degradation, urine, victim blaming

The entirety of the second chapter is a rape scene. The way this author chose to go about handling it is abhorrent. It reads like trauma porn, described in unnecessarily vivid detail that is voyeuristic in nature. To begin with, we already know the harms of spreading misinformation about BDSM in literature (see sexual assault cases following the release of the 50 shades series), and this is a HARMFUL depiction of BDSM. The narrator and his intended partner for the scene are not fluent in the same languages which shows the complete disregard for how necessary communication is for consent. If the author was attempting to show the importance of consent they did an extremely poor job and there are much better ways to go about it. It is clear from certain pieces of the narrators internal dialogue that there is very little communication defining the limits and expectations of the scene which would be normative in any consensual interaction. Some of the narrators internal dialogue shows he and rapist were not privy to each others expectations and limits and misconstrue how a healthy dynamic would work. For example: “ I know there are men who like it, who go to great lengths to find others who will hurt them in exactly this way, though I’ve never been able to fathom the pleasure they take from it. But then there’s no fathoming pleasure, the forms it takes or their sources, nothing we can imagine is beyond it; however far beyond the pale of our own desires, for someone it is the intensest desire, the key to the latch of the self, or the promised key, a key that perhaps never turns “—this feels like a way to excuse a blatant disregard for boundaries and abuse. The way the author chose to approach the narrators experience feels like a violation itself. While a great deal of trauma survivors experience guilt and shame, which we see with the narrator, the way the author chose to depict this feeds into victim blaming narratives. There is no need to subject readers to potential retraumatization to show the audience the horrors of surviving trauma. If the authors goal is to show the complex nature of being closeted and the violence so many are subjected to they could have done so in a way that was supportive of the people who have actually experienced said violence and trauma. As a queer person who has survived trauma, this was tasteless and callous.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amna_a's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

1.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings