Reviews

The Voyage of the Narwhal by Andrea Barrett

wynnepei's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous inspiring reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

savannaskye's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

sugarpop's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This novel offers a very human look onto the arctic exploration during the 1850s.

The need to achieve, to be famous, and to satisfy curiosity leads the men to terrible decisions and occurences and leaves them to deal with the aftermath in a world that doesn't feel right anymore.

I was surprised how close this story flgets to reality and how much of actual history was worked in and discussed in rich facets.

jarichan's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Dieses Buch lag bereits auf meiner Wuschliste, als ich vom Unionsverlag ein Leseexemplar erhielt. Die Freude war gross. Gross war auch die Lesefreude, denn Barretts Buch entspricht haargenau meinem Beuteschema.

Wir fahren in den wilden Norden, aber es ist kein Abenteuerbuch, das wir hier in den Händen halten, sondern ein nachdenkliches Werk über das Wesen der Seele. Es ist eindeutig ein Charakterbuch. Die Figuren und ihre Beziehungen, Wünsche, Gedanken stehen im Mittelpunkt.

Gleichzeitig erfährt man auch einiges an historischen Fakten über diverse Fahrten in die Arktis. Zusammen mit dem wundervoll gefühlvollen Schreibstil Barrett ergibt das einen Roman, der es schafft, tief zu blicken. Tief in die Unwirklichkeiten von Schnee und Eis, von Verzweiflungstaten, von Freundschaft und Loyalität, von Einsamkeit und starkem Willen.

Wer sich für das eine oder andere Thema begeistern kann, wird das Lesen nicht bereuen. Leser, die beides sehr schätzen, kommen hier voll auf ihre Kosten. So wie ich. Ich habe Seite für Seite geliebt. Mit den Figuren gehofft, gelitten, geweint, gelacht. Dabei auch noch Informationen aufgeschnappt und unvergessliche Szenen in meinem Kopf abgespeichert.

Genau das, worauf ich gehofft hatte, als ich dieses Buch auf meine Wunschliste legte, und sogar noch mehr.

blueskygreentreesyellowsun's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

When Zeke came back my heart sank - there was just no good that could come from him and his way of stealing all the happiness in a room for himself. I slammed the book down and walked away, and it took me three days to sufficiently nerve myself for whatever was to come.

When Dr. Boerhaave died my heart broke for him and also for Erasmus, who was just beginning to see the beauty of having a dear friend. When Erasmus got the letter from one of the doctor's other friends, and that friend called the doctor by his first name, I felt Erasmus's sadness and shame that his priceless friendship apparently hadn't even made it out of stage 1. Who among us hasn't been crushed by the knowledge that someone is more important to us than we are to them.

When the author described how the doctor's drowned head had washed up on the cliff below the men's camp, and that they simply didn't look over, nor did they hear the wind whistling across the jawbone, I gasped. The way that she showed us something that could have been life-altering for Erasmus but wasn't, how she played with going past coincidence into far-fetchedness BUT DIDN'T, was brilliant.

Wonderful wonderful wonderful book.

maisiedatson's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

this is a weird book. read if you're interested in 1850s whaling?

elenajohansen's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I've always been interested both in science and in the history of science, so a book following the voyage of an arctic expedition in the 1850's, even if it's fictional? Yes, please.

And while I was captivated by the details of survival in the arctic, by the forming friendships and rivalries of the crew, and the constant troubles that assaulted them on the journey, then the journey was over--halfway through the book.

The entire middle section was a directionless morass of personal misery for the (arguably) main character Erasmus, and only when the assumed-dead Zeke returned home with two of the natives who saved him (a mother and her son) to tell a fantastic story of his survival, did the story pick up any speed again.

Then it's a parable of racism, when the only way Zeke has to make any money from the badly botched journey is to put on a traveling show exhibiting the natives, and everyone else in his family is basically horrified by it (though his wife is more jealous of the time they take up than horrified by his treatment of them.) Erasmus, with a little help from the few friends he still has, rescues the boy after his mother dies of fever, and returns him home, because while they may be white Americans in the 1850's and casually racist about a lot of stuff (and they are!) even they know what Zeke is doing is cruel and wrong.

And then it's over.

I enjoyed the writing style, I enjoyed the science, I enjoyed the characters for the most part. I'm a little mystified by the plotting and pacing, because everything really does fall apart in the middle. Even if Erasmus is depressed and directionless, it didn't mean the arc of the narrative had to be.

disreputabledog's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

piratequeen's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative inspiring reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

jrsands's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0