Reviews with content warning for Gaslighting - The Love Hypothesis

Reviews tagging 'Gaslighting'

The Love Hypothesis, by Ali Hazelwood

100 reviews

sydfitch's review against another edition

emotional lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

The book was good, but everything plot wise was very predictable. The smutty part was good, but (i cant make this up) wasnt until 69% into the audiobook. It was a fun listen but i wouldn’t say it was one that made you think. A fluffy fun book.

Content Warnings

diana_raquel's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

“I'm starting to wonder if this is what being in love is. Being okay with ripping yourself to shreds, so the other person can stay whole.”

I must confess that I was reticent about this book. Not because it used to be star wars fanfiction (I only discover that after buying the book) but because it is a popular book. Popular books are 50/50 to me, and I'm always reticent about starting one. But I really liked it.

As far as romances go, this isn't the best romance that I ever read. But it's damn entertaining and I was engaged all the time. And that makes all the difference to me. It's a little cliché at some points but there are some plot points that caught me by surprise. The characters are interesting and funny, which was also a good point for me!

So, I really liked this book, and I do recommend it if you want something light and entertaining. Its a really good beach read.

Content Warnings

cstein's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful lighthearted relaxing fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

A sweet, laugh out loud, overall pretty perfect romance novel, with a unique and convincing setting, plenty of relatable observations about academia, and numerous winks to the reader. Also I liked the hypotheses at the start of each chapter giving a lil preview. Can't give 5 stars only because I wasn't always convinced by the dialogue—LOTS of discussing Starbucks drinks and some clumsy terms of endearment.

Content Warnings

sophs_mood_reading_room's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

My second contemporary romance read I’ve chosen the very much hyped book from bookstagram.

Olive a grad student at Stanford enters into a fake relationship with Dr Adam Carlsen, the arrogant ass professor. Why you ask? As a far fetched plan to convince her friend to date someone else and to convince the university to release Adam’s grant funds.
And thus the classic fake dating trope unfolds.

This was a fun little book but I did find Olives over thinking annoying and her wild on the spot decision making unrealistic. It was great to see a woman working in STEM represented as someone intelligent and doing great work in her field.

One issue I had was the gaslighting. It has to be my pet hate and I didn’t really think it fit the way Olives character has been built up. Yes she was insecure but she was so feisty it just seemed not quite right that she would be a victim and fall for this.

Other trigger warnings include cancer, sexual assault and mental abuse and some 🌶️🌶️🌶️🌶️ spice (18+ recommendation)

All in all a fun and easy read (or listen in this case).

Content Warnings

meganpbennett's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I quite liked this book, and I have no idea what all of the internet hate is about, because all I've seen on social media is about how awful this book was. I think it's because it is very obvious that it used to be Reylo fanfic, and people just hate fanfic for some reason.

Well, it was quite good, and fell into several tropes that I really like, including fake dating and real feels. It features demi-sexuality rep, Jewish rep, and Olive discovered a lot about herself and what she really wants in life as the story goes on. There were aspects I thought could be better, but it was fun. Olive was witty and incredibly genre-savvy, and while Adam was pretty one-dimensional, he does grow a fair amount as a character.

Content Warnings

thewildmageslibrary's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.5

I really loved this. Not a Reylo shipper (don't hate me), so it took me a while to work up the motivation to read this. But now I need a physical copy that I don't have to give back to the library.

Content Warnings

steffandbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny lighthearted fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

This is the cutest freaking shit I‘ve read in a long while. Such a vibe and I enjoyed every single second of it.
I wanted to strangle Olive a few times because she was so oblivious but the also she so cute and adorable.
And Adam. *sigh* now I want a Adam in my life as well. He’s also so cute, but also so other 😏 the perfect combination if you‘d asked me. ☺️

Content Warnings

tsar's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful lighthearted relaxing medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

“I'm starting to wonder if this is what being in love is. Being okay with ripping yourself to shreds, so the other person can stay whole.”

Dubbed as the sensation in the book community across social media platforms, The Love Hypothesis recounts the story of Olive Smith, an intelligent science Ph.D. candidate who accidentally ropes Adam Carlsen, the renowned young and attractive but grumpy professor of her campus into a fake dating scheme by kissing him in front of her best friend Anh, in hopes that the gesture would convince her best friend that it'd be alright to date Olive's short-termed ex. Like any other romance that draws the fake dating theme, chaos and misunderstandings would ensue between Olive and Adam as they come to terms with their true feelings for one another.

If we talk about the plot itself, it's a very familiar trope that has been used more than enough times in fiction. As an audience, we have understood the basic premise of what would happen when two potential lovebirds agree to fake-date one another regardless of their respective reasons. Thus, to see whether the trope succeeds in building such a heated romantic story filled with adoration lies on the author's ability to elevate the trope into a fresh and engaging story for the audience to bite their nails in anticipation of the characters' romantic mishaps. For The Love Hypothesis, the answer is found in an academic setting.

As the author of the book, Ali Hazelwood has a specific goal in mind when she writes contemporary romance stories: to introduce the world of academia through the point of view of an intelligent, attractive young woman actively working in the STEM field while navigating some blossoming relationships she's discovered amongst her peers along the way.

Hazelwood opens the narrative by describing the highly competitive environment of the field that the public knows so little of, beginning from the limited numbers of interest to play in the research field compared to the industry, the implicit insinuation of high confidentiality of their works, and the unspoken stigma of ambitious scholars who have almost zero social lives. She twists a contrast from the earliest page of the book to the referred gossip mills spread around the chapters that present a fact that ambitious scholars do have quite busy social lives, some of them are spectacular and even risky, aside from their focus on several topics and brainstorms that they attempt to discover through the studies they've been pursuing. She takes it up a notch by exemplifying another fact that scientific scholars of the modern age consist of genius brains coming from diverse backgrounds, races, sexuality, and gender—no longer the world exclusively for white men.

It's a refreshing take to witness, albeit it's quite challenging to pull off in romantic comedy fiction, for the possibility of inaccuracy in the narrative or weighing down the light-hearted atmosphere of the fiction subgenre because of the many foreign scientific terms littered around the pages. Yet, Hazelwood demonstrates her capabilities in constructing some science-related discussions understandable while maintaining the classic feel-good tone of a romantic comedy; as someone who is a neuroscientist and recently becoming a STEM professor in the higher education institution, Hazelwood composes her explanation regarding science, methodical studies, and other higher education-related topics, such as fellowships and grants in a simple conversational way that universally enlighten her readers, whether they are familiar with the environment or have zero knowledge about it before reading her books.

Not to mention, choosing fiction as her path to pour her creativity outside of her current field allows her the freedom in contesting some sensitive topics encountered in the environment, but mostly failed to be highlighted as serious issues that demand changes for fairer and better treatment of the aspiring scholars. For example, through the side arc between Olive and Tom Benton, the other attractive professor with whom she receives her first acceptance of her research pitch, we witness a blatant unbalanced power dynamic between both of them where Tom could comfortably pressure Olive for sexual offers in exchange of easier access to continue her research—or the fact that he could demean her brilliance then accuse her of being an opportunistic and silly girl by entering a relationship with Adam.

Another instance could be read from Adam's recount of his academic life when he was still a college student; some professors had indicted Adam as a useless student, constantly taking notice of his mistakes and making a big deal of them, even when his works were considerably flawless—going so far as to pit him against his best friend Holden just to scramble for a lifetime opportunity of having their research ideas funded. These examples present the long-time problem of power play, unveiled from the characters with powerful back-ups and acclaimed reputations like Tom and the professors from Adam's student years, whose misdeeds are either dismissed or remained unchallenged because their opponents happen to be exceptional albeit naive students with less prominent connections, such as Adam during his student days and Olive in the current time.

As a result, Hazelwood conveys a new insight for her readers to be aware that these several acts of harassment and bullying are extensive—that they could happen on any field, campus, workplace, and even home—and could be severely damaging to the point of considering to give up their talents to save themselves from further cruel aggravations

I've mentioned how Hazelwood imbues her story with a set of diverse and lively characters, so let's begin with the protagonists themselves. Olive Smith is an average height white woman with red hair and cute little freckles all over her body, who comes from a relatively poor and broken household before she achieves an impressive academic stage in the present—she once lived with her single mother as her father never existed in her life, then she had to go from foster homes to foster homes after her mother died because of pancreatic cancer. Living in such a challenging environment has shaped Olive into an independent young woman, albeit a bit reclusive and a loner sometimes.

She is idealistic and ambitious, transparently driven by her past to discover a more effective way of diagnosing terminal illnesses, which could be a breakthrough in the medical field if she succeeds. Yet, Hazelwood describes that Olive’s ambition doesn't transform her into a self-important person; she keeps improving herself, learns from her seniors, and considers their advice as she works hard to meet her goal. Despite her slight detachment from major social circles, Olive has also shown to be an attentive companion to her close friend group. She pays attention to their stories and hardships, is selfless in the way that she would avoid doing something that could make her friends hurt, and understands her position as an ally by not stepping out of line when she supports equality causes that she, in fact, is not the one who would be severely harmed due to her obvious advantages.

On the other hand, Adam Carlsen is not the unattractive, stereotyped broody nerd getting a makeover that readers would expect. He is unfairly handsome, having a jacked body and maintaining a healthy lifestyle with a punctual schedule of gym visits outside of his teaching time. Contrasting Olive's background, Adam comes from a relatively well-off family, where his parents are diplomats, and he's had the chance to explore the world during his childhood. Still contradicting Olive's backstory, the socio-economic privilege that Adam has is exchanged with the distant relationship between him and his parents, unlike Olive, who had a strong family bond with her mother before her mother's death.

While he is infamously sharp with his critique towards the students' research to the point that they come out too harsh sometimes, Hazelwood doesn't illustrate him to be an extremely holier-than-thou person who boasts his achievements proudly. In fact, Hazelwood writes him to retain a semblance of shyness in his bones—an apparent example is implicitly drawn from several scenes where Adam feels that he's at a dead-end with his career, almost giving up with academia and choosing to apply to the industry instead.

This is why reading their blossoming relationship from fake dating to an actual relationship is a delightful ride. Aside from the fact that Hazelwood manages to build a hot and heavy tension while each protagonist tries to control their true desire during the whole scheme, she also succeeds in having them bond with each other about their lives, particularly their dreams and insecurities as part of a cutthroat environment like the STEM field. Even when they argue and banter with each other, Hazelwood maintains a penchant for mutual respect that both characters exude, remarkably avoiding silly scenarios that contain hurls of offensive insults to one another.

For a romantic comedy that is primarily so white, Hazelwood is wonderful in diversifying the supporting characters in Olive's and Adam's lives, imbuing such vigorous energy and distinct personalities in their characterization that makes them compelling for readers to know more about them and avoiding the risk of being tokenized figures solely for the diversity agenda. Hazelwood gives them enough spotlight to talk about their respective struggles; for example, Anh's aspiration to create a community for WOC working in the STEM field to help each other, or letting Malcolm gushes over his crush on Holden Rodriguez, the other young and hot professor, and vent out his frustration towards Adam's too strict teaching methods that Olive unexpectedly listens and regards instead of dismissing it completely in defense of her 'fake' boyfriend. Even Holden and his more carefree attitude is endearing to witness, despite that his description is mainly told through Adam's stories or Malcolm's infatuated croons.

If Hazelwood is intrigued to bring these three as main characters in sequels, either written by herself or collaborating with another author to mitigate potential insensitive writing, I would love to read more about Anh and Jeremy or Holden and Malcolm.

To conclude, am I satisfied with the novel? Absolutely yes, without a doubt. I am usually skeptical about hyped books, particularly because they often don't meet my expectations, but The Love Hypothesis is as excellent as how people praise them. So, I could say that the book deserves the many compliments it receives, and I am personally anticipating Hazelwood's next adventure in the academia world.

Content Warnings

readandfindout's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted fast-paced

Diverse cast of characters? Yes

5.0

Style/writing: 4.5 stars
Themes: 5 stars
Characters: 5 stars
Plot: 5 stars

Content Warnings

saurahsaurus's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful informative lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

More...