raddy's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative medium-paced

4.0

kewlpinguino's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

3.5. Before I say anything I have to admit two things:

1. I've always kind of dismissed Derrida as a pretentious incomprehensible language theorist, but after finding out about his late ethical period and reading this I really need to reconsider my stance; in other words, he's far from being Bataille.

2. I found this book through a Goodreads "people also liked" list and only initially hovered over it because of the cool looking cover, but the title and the concept grabbed me.

Now:

While I didn't grab everything here, I think if I reread it I'll get even more out of it. I do admire Derrida's effort and the concepts I grasped I think I mostly agreed with, especially in the Cosmopolitanism section, because the Forgiveness, while interesting, aren't applicable to a political system. Nonetheless I think I might read more of Derrida's ethics work.

ginaemily's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

On Forgiveness = 4 stars
On Cosmopolitanism = ????

bearjake's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

It’s really good you guys

atsundarsingh's review

Go to review page

4.0

I didn't want to like Derrida, because the other Derrida readings I have done say things like "the structurality of structure" and to be honest I find it annoying how difficulty those concepts are to parse. These essays on the other hand felt quite clear, and relevant to the current moment. Dealing in themes such as who can forgive, what rules of asylum a good city should have, and what to do with our old practices of hospitality in a world not built for them, Derrida posits some ideas worth mulling over. Maybe deconstruction is worth my time after all....
More...