Reviews tagging 'Rape'

Apocalipsa by Stephen King

107 reviews

readingoverbreathing's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional hopeful reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I think it's official — Stephen King is now one of my all-time favorite writers. I used to think his work, just due to genre, wasn't for me, but, boy, was I wrong. He is just such a brilliant writer, so imaginative, so good at pacing and suspense and at creating characters you find yourself desperately attached to. It is so rare now that I find myself as anxious for a cast of characters and their fate as I found myself here.

I have to say that having now lived through a global pandemic, this book hit home all the harder, even made it seem like we all got off pretty easy. Pre-2020, I might have found this a lot less believable and emotionally engrossing than I did. The first part especially really brings you back to March 2020, when everything descended into chaos almost overnight and suddenly all the problems you had before paled in comparison to the fear and uncertainty. That chapter where King traces the spread of the superflu from the one state trooper — wasn't that all what we spent months trying to reconstruct in real life?

I recognize that the classic moral battle between good and evil that King imposes here may not be for everyone, but I found it utterly fascinating, especially against the backdrop of 20th-century America. That being said, I will add that I was rather frustrated that we never hear much about how the superflu affects the rest of the world. I get that there was no way for the characters to really find out and that this is already 1200 pages long, but I found that Americentrism as equally frustrating as I did thematically fascinating.

Okay, I know there are those out there sick of hearing me talk about Ayn Rand, but there was a lot here that honestly reminded me of Atlas Shrugged. There's that same wide, continental, truly American reach, coast to damn coast, the sanctuary in the mountains, the moral crisis at hand. Fran and Stu, I'd argue, even could have been Dagny and Rearden in their previous lives. But thankfully, here King lays off the capitalist crusade (in fact, even seems to argue against).

Let's go back to the characters, though. Stu, Fran, Larry, Glen, Nick, Tom — I loved them all so much, again in a way that's rare for me these days. I also loved how, once we got to the Free Zone, King incorporates such an array of equally vivid side characters and townspeople. This attention to character and detail, science fiction though it may be, really lent the story a sense of reality. The variety of perspectives offered in the early part, where we get a sense of everyone's pre-flu life and early experiences and loss, again reminded me of March 2020. Like the Free Zoners, we all had our own tales of plans that were cancelled and knew exactly what we were doing when we realized just how serious the virus had become.

1200 pages afford a lot of detail, but King did not waste any of it. You get every angle, every ounce of desperation, every inner struggle. Few could take on a book of this magnitude and make it work, but King sure does. It's a commitment and it can get gross, but to me, it was so worth it. Talk about a great American novel.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

dezzella's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.0

Read this for my dad. He really liked it and was excited for me to read it... welp it wasn't for me. This was also my first Stephen King novel I believe.

It was an extremely slow paced (which i expected, that alone wouldn't have given it this rating) dystopian novel starting with a pandemic that wipes out a lot of humanity. I read the version that was a 47 hour audiobook and it felt like it was just dragging on. There were some moments I didn't get/ or were confusing to me. And some of the character motivations were weird. 

My biggest gripe are the characters. I didn't really feel attached to any of them, and there were so many that it was honestly hard to keep track. Also, there is a lot of dated terminology and slurs that are now considered inappropriate and cruel (n word for black characters and r word for mental disabilities for example, and they are used repeatedly. I've confirmed from a few other friends that this is a trend with King's writing). 

The latter part of the books starts to bring more Christian references which sometimes just felt out of place. I think this would have been a lot cooler if the problems were more focused around the plague than the supernatural elements at the end. Honestly concept-wise this book sounded like a good time, it's a shame it let me down.


Spoiler thoughts, referencing specific scenes/scenarios including the ending:
How Tom was treated in this book bothered me sometimes. Especially when they were using him for a spying mission. As he has a mental disability, the other characters were using this to their advantage.  It just rubbed me the wrong way and I didn't like it. 

The ending was a bit strange. Not going to say I expected a nuke to go off or for the LITERAL hand of God to appear and pluck the bad guy away. That was certainly a choice. 

I felt like the summary was a bit misleading, because while we had our bad guy/ dark lord/ prince of evil and this older lady who was "good". There wasn't a lot done with the good side, she ends up dying and the characters are really facing against the bad guy who is bad.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

n0e11e0000's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sir_rosalind's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

cameoutbustin's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional inspiring mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

wish it was longer and the ending was a little bit better, but overall the book was worth the read and i thoroughly enjoyed it

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

yellowpurple500's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

My new favourite King book.

I went into this expecting to enjoy a story about a pandemic. Nothing prepared me for the emotional journey I was taken on. I love the cast of characters and how everyone gradually links together. I love how all of kings stories have a supernatural element and I enjoyed the "is this supernatural or are we just going insane". 

I would definitely recommend this book to everyone. It's not an easy read but it's so worth it. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bec_s's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous inspiring tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

urnee's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ladymaiq's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lilashelly's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional hopeful sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

I generally don't read Stephen King. I don't like his writing style, I find it to be very pretentious. But a friend at work told me this is his favorite horror book so I gave it a shot. I actually did enjoy the plot, but there's so much that feels so dragged out and a lot of filler. And I get that it was written in 1990, but a lot of the racial terms felt unnecessarily added.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings