Reviews

The Armageddon Rag by George R.R. Martin

emilym53's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional hopeful slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

captainozone's review

Go to review page

4.0

An unexpected treasure. The Armageddon Rag is full of spirit, passion, nostalgia, and no small amount of GRRM madness.

I have to say, as a lover of live music, no one has quite captured the essence of a good concert quite like GRRM has in this book. That is something that can transcend generations, regardless of your taste in music, and I applaud the book for capturing it in as raw and powerful a way as it did.

vivelaviv's review

Go to review page

4.0

I read this book when I was a teenager and the story stuck with me for life. i just reread it again and still love it.

kalldimma's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional hopeful mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

jonmhansen's review

Go to review page

4.0

It's good (Martin is always good), although I will say I thought the protagonist much more of an asshole than he was probably intended to be. I also wonder how it worked if I'd read it in '85, instead of '17, with bands like the Rolling Stones still touring, along with so many others. People complain about the kids today and how they don't act like they should, but at the end of it, everyone just misses being young and hopeful themselves.

sundhu's review

Go to review page

slow-paced

3.0

krasmazov's review

Go to review page

5.0

George R. R. Martin's "The Armageddon Rag" is something that I feel is on a sort of love it or hate it kind of spectrum. What I mean is by that is how this book seems to be about stuff that would only appeal to certain people. For instance I suspect one would really need to be into 1960s counterculture and classic rock to really get into the story. Also for a mystery/horror novel the horror elements really don't show up until the middle point and the final chapters. But before all of that how about a little summary.

Former journalist and now full time novelist Sandy Blair is in a bit of a rut. His latest book is going nowhere, his girlfriend is a bit of an ice queen, and the music today(1983) sucks. It isn't until his former partner calls him about the murder of Jamie Lynch, former manager of the band The Nazgûl, that Blair finally has some sort of purpose. Lynch's murder combined with the earlier murder of The Nazgûl's lead singer Patrick Henry Hobbins at a concert in 1971, and this spurs Blair to find a deeper meaning between the two murders. Meanwhile in the background the titular Armageddon Rag waits to be played in order to change the world.

If there is one universal praise for George R. R. Martin it is his worldbuilding. Even though "The Armageddon Rag" takes place in our world Martin is sure to make The Nazgûl not feel out of place in comparison to real life bands from the 60s. Original albums, songs lyrics, and posters have all been created to give The Nazgûl life. Near the end of the novel I could actually hear the music, maybe my brain was mixing up some bands I'd been listening to before, but I remember the beat of Gopher John's drums and the Hobbins' singing. I really must commend Martin because usually when I see song lyrics in books I just skip over them because they're boring and don't really contribute much to the plot. But not here the lyrics aren't mind blowing but they weren't just filler to make a certain page count or something.

One criticism I do have is how a lot of people, Blair included, complain about how nobody really understood "The Movement." It doesn't crop up often but when it does expect many passionate speeches about how Baby Boomers were only trying to make the world a better place, and how the establishment and the rest of society just ignored them. Every character is guilty of this especially the villains. For the villains it made me hate them a little bit more so points for that. This is really the only part of the novel that I actually had a problem with, and in retrospect the good parts most definitely outshine this one critique.

Speaking of good parts I love the inside story about The Nazgûl. It sort of reminds me of a mash up between the problems that The Beatles and Pink Floyd faced. Much like The Beatles internal conflicts inside The Nazgûl started to drain on the group cohesiveness, and like Pink Floyd the band found itself dominated by just one egotistical member. This just makes me love the book even more because I always found the inner working of rock bands so interesting, and this just adds to the setting and characters.

I know this review might seem like it's rambling but there's just so much in this book that I want to talk about. Like how every chapter begins with lyrics from classic rock songs or how the horror elements are actually a bit spine tingling. But to boil it all down if you're a fan of classic rock, horror, fantasy, and 1960s America then this book is perfect for you. If you're not a fan of all of those things then the book might be a bit harder to enjoy. "The Armageddon Rag" isn't flawless, but the good most definitely outweighs the bad.



mayedayyy's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark hopeful mysterious tense medium-paced

4.25

karthikm_86's review

Go to review page

5.0

made me miss rock'n roll!

lc_mitchell's review

Go to review page

4.0

The Armageddon Rag is a darn good story, it's really as simple as that. Sandy Blair is a former music-journalist, tasked with writing an article about a band he covered in his glory days, brought about by the murder of the band's promoter. The build-up in tension was very well-done, as was the pacing which made this a very easy book to get lost in.

The pacing and the tension being so good ultimately lead to where it fell down, as it built the book up to a point where it couldn't deliver on its promises. I was disappointed in the ending, and thought the plot twist at the end was a little predictable. Also the female characters were very flat, and told you more about the protagonist than about themselves as autonomous people.

However, I did procrastinate on Things-That-Need-Doing in order to finish this book, which is why (including the strength of the plot) I have given it 4 stars.