Scan barcode
madamenovelist's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Bullying, Emotional abuse, and Infidelity
Moderate: Ableism, Misogyny, Sexism, and Classism
Minor: Alcohol and Injury/Injury detail
daryn's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
Graphic: Infidelity and Sexism
Minor: Death and Racism
jellogirl2010's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
All in all, this feels like a very weak entry into her very stellar bibliography.
Also, we've been fooled and gaslit somewhere along the line... because Edmund does not once say that he's loved her as a hero loves a heroine. He doesn't have it in him to say something that romantic. Unless I'm mistaking another one of her books for Mansfield Park, but I could swear he's said it in some book to movie adaptation
Minor: Sexism
heresyourletter's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
Graphic: Bullying, Emotional abuse, Toxic relationship, Toxic friendship, and Classism
Moderate: Infidelity, Sexism, Religious bigotry, Gaslighting, Abandonment, Sexual harassment, and Colonisation
Minor: Alcoholism, Child death, Cursing, and Slavery
anjasshelf's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Incest, Infidelity, Sexism, and Classism
Moderate: Child death, Death, Misogyny, Slavery, Toxic relationship, Medical content, Toxic friendship, and Colonisation
fjordpingvin's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Sexism and Classism
Moderate: Bullying, Infidelity, Toxic friendship, Abandonment, and Colonisation
Minor: Alcoholism, Child death, and Slavery
madamenovelist's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Misogyny and Sexism
Minor: Child death
booksjessreads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
I felt like Fanny was the most quiet of the heroines in the Austen novels, she was more moralistic, but generally very passive, never speaking her mind. Due to her upbringing, its clear this behaviour is instilled in her. She is surrounded by more colourful characters which are clearly more dramatic and provide a lot of the plot-line due to their eccentricity, which Fanny, and therefore the reader, passively experiences. Although, in a way, this passivity of Fanny surrounded by her eccentric characters actually demonstrates an element of steadfastness and loyalty to her Christian virtues, rather than being swayed by the other's behaviour.
I also liked how the novel not only explored standard themes of marriage, friendship and class, but also added the theme of slavery in here with Lord Norris being a slave-trader, living in a house named Mansfield Park (named after a slave-trader who adopted a mixed-race girl and forcing her to live as an outsider). This novel was telling of the way in which richer families engaged with that aspect of their history and was an insightful element.
Despite these interesting elements of the novel, I found that Fanny's placidity meant there wasn't as much for the reader to engage with and generally found it hard to follow sometimes. The purpose is obviously to portray Fanny in a certain way, but for reader engagement and expectation, it does let it down a little.
Graphic: Misogyny and Sexism
Minor: Slavery
handsome_enough_to_tempt_me's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
um anyway this is kinda complicated bc Fanny is literally the most annoying person on the planet but also there were some super interesting themes throughout and like as far as literary analysis goes it’s great but plot character no
except I actually have the most toxic crush on Henry Crawford but whatever
Moderate: Incest, Misogyny, Sexism, and Toxic relationship