cgriesemer's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I love Bill Bryson’s books with every fiber of my being. What a fascinating look at the history of language in America and the events that shaped it. Wish it was about 15,000 pages long.

wilkerwyrm's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This book has so many great anecdotes. I could go on and on with the fun facts I learned. However I subtracted a star because when I researched one of the fun facts independently, it turned out to be incorrect (the author claims Massachusetts waited 150 years to sign the bill of rights but it was actually Connecticut). This makes me wonder about the other facts I read but I will happily spout them as if they were true and it is a fun read.

spooky_simon's review

Go to review page

What started as a delightful exploration of the development of American English took an unnecessary tangent into the authors options and beliefs about American history. In a book replete with footnotes, a glaring lack of citations exist for his belief that "the physical cruelties to which [slaves] were subjected have perhaps been somewhat inflated in the popular mind - most were at least passably fed and clothed ... It was after all in the slaveowners interest to look after his property" two sentences before euphemistically explaining that female slaves were the subject to routine and systematic rape at the hands of not only their owners but also their overseers. I'm not sure if it makes it any better that he says actually what they did face was humiliation and how bad that was. 

Not only is this ahistorical, but it's just weird and unnecessary to put it. It colors the rest of the book and every other historical opinion he has comes across in the context of this point of view. As the book progresses, he actually has increasingly long stretches without citations which I can now only assume are just bloviating.

Sorry, Bill, stick to sucking at hiking, that was really funny at least.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

aclayton_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

4.75

So much interesting information in this book! Thoroughly enjoyed 

laurapoulosky's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I read this book in the mid-1990s after an English friend of mine in France, who was always amused by my Americanisms, recommended it to me. I remembering enjoying it a lot!

aemily's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I have some really mixed feelings about this book!

It took me longer than normal to read, in part because of the way it was organized. The chapters are thematic and sort of chronological, but not always. While I expected more information about linguistic forms that originated or came into common use in America, the book is almost exclusively about words that came about because of new stuff; I imagined that the word “telegraph” came about at the time of the invention of the telegraph, so I don’t need that fact spelled out. It often felt like a brief version of a US history textbook rather than a book about language.

There are also some specious claims: at one point, Bryson writes that there never was a word ‘penny.’ Of course there is! It may be an interesting oddity that this word does not appear in the texts he was looking at, but any linguist—or reasonable person, for that matter—would agree that the word exists. The final chapter rubbed me the wrong way as a teacher of English learners. Not only did he graze over some statistics about American children’s’ reading abilities, he danced around some opinions about immigrants learning English. It was as if he was trying to walk a perfect line between ‘it’s America, speak English’ and ‘immigrants are great,’ but executed both positions poorly.

There are interesting tidbits, to be sure, but I would not use this as a basis for understanding English in America.

sandylc's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

 
Lots of amusing and interesting historical tidbits, served with humor.

 

npeva's review

Go to review page

Slow, tedious, unimportant information, repetitive. 

nathanielgale's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

4.25

bethdillman's review

Go to review page

It's pretty boring and dry. I fall asleep every time I pick it up.