Reviews

What Belongs to You by Garth Greenwell

fionnious's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Taking part in this LGBTQ history month challenge has shown me just how many raw and powerful queer texts I have to read... or maybe I’m just an emotional mess!

fnnbnjmnks's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Taking part in this LGBTQ history month challenge has shown me just how many raw and powerful queer texts I have to read... or maybe I’m just an emotional mess!

patriciaxh's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional reflective sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

missdandyreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Wie soll man dieses Buch anders bewerten, als mit 5 Sternen? Ich habe bei diesem Roman sowohl mit Mitko, als auch mit dem Erzähler gelitten und getrauert. Ihre homosexuelle Beziehung ist geprägt durch Dominanzgefüge, Gewalt, Drohungen, Gier, aber auch Bettelei, dem freiwilligen Benutztwerden bis hin zu masochistischen Tendenzen und dem Wunsch, einen Platz in der Welt zu haben, ein Schrei nach dem einen Menschen, der einem hilft, wenn die Welt zusammenbricht. Sehr poetisch geschrieben, ohne ins Kitschige abzudriften. Ein starkes Debüt!

lizzym126's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

thomasgoddard's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0



Let's get one thing straight, the writing itself is technically brilliant and very engaging. It stirs you up inside. The slight failure here is that sometimes it stirs you up a little too much. I especially loved the train scene. It managed to present me with a character that I felt like I knew well, despite knowing so little about him. A sign of great writing. To give you a sense of a person with one small scrap of them showing. You learn to intuit them.

So that I don't ruin this one for anyone, I'll put this little advance warning. It isn't a major plot point really, so the rest of the story remains unblemished. This criticism will tackle something halfway through the book though, so be mindful.

The main character is told to get checked by someone. He gets checked. The author makes the diagnosis very negative and serious. This felt really disproportionate to me. In fact, it felt a little problematic. Because if you gear up one illness to the place of another, you devalue the worse one. In this case. Here it is. The author describes the devastating impact of a diagnosis of gonorrhoea. But it's lingered over and preempted to the point of farce. It feels like this diagnosis is HIV. It feels like the story might slide in that direction. But even when it is clearly just gonorrhoea, it still has this really unsettling poignancy. It feels disrespectful. And don't think that I mean poignant in a purposeful and interesting way. I mean it's like getting really emotionally expressive about a broken toe... to a point where if you had a leg amputated, you'd tell them to get a grip.

That aspect ruined this book for me. It's a massive shame too. The story was a 4. The writing style was a 5. Characterisation was a 4. But that single aspect... for me... Leaves this one at a 3.

I've bought the authors second book Cleanness. So hopefully that's better.

emziexjayne's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

fruitbatblues's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.25

jarichan's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Dieses Buch habe ich vor x Jahren auf den Reader geworfen. Nun, da ich es endlich gelesen habe, denke ich, hätte es mir wohl besser gefallen, wenn ich es damals gleich gelesen hätte. Mein Lesegeschmack hat sich unterdessen nämlich geändert. Was mich davon abhielt, das E-Book zu entfernen? Die vielen positiven Rezensionen, die ich damals gelesen habe, die sagten, das Buch sei auch aus psychologischer Sicht interessant.

Leider wurde ich enttäuscht. Es kann gut sein, dass der Autor die Figuren sehr gut auslotet, aber da mir alle Charaktere fremd blieben, also nur geschriebene Worte auf fingiertem Papier blieben, kann ich das schwerlich beurteilen.

Da mir auch grundsätzlich Liebes- und Beziehungsgeschichten kaum zusagen, war ich ebenso am falschen Ort. Hinzu kam, dass ich in keinster Weise nachvollziehen konnte, was genau der Erzähler an Mitko so anziehend fand. Da mir das jedoch auch bei real existierenden Menschen oft geschieht, sind mir die Figuren vielleicht doch nicht so fremd geblieben.

Als ich am Ende des Buches erfuhr, dass der Autor aus einer dieser amerikanischen Schreibstuben stammt, in denen sie Schriftsteller züchten und ihnen beibringen, nach Schema F zu schreiben, wurde mir einiges klar. Mit diesen Zucht-Schreibern stand ich schon des Öfteren auf Kollisionskurs. Die liegen mir mit ihren sterilen Büchern einfach nicht.

Gefallen haben mir jedoch die immer wieder eingeschobenen bulgarischen Ausdrücke und Sätze. Das lässt den Handlungsort realer und greifbarer erscheinen und haucht auch den Charakteren mehr Leben ein.

nweedle's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0