Reviews tagging 'Forced institutionalization'
The Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat: And Other Clinical Tales by Oliver Sacks
9 reviews
kat_smith24's review against another edition
hopeful
informative
reflective
slow-paced
3.5
Though the language is outdated and paternalistic, this book offers a surprisingly nuanced approach to (at the time) rarer neurological disorders.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Ableism, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Forced institutionalization, Mental illness, Confinement, Panic attacks/disorders, and Dementia
navayiota's review against another edition
challenging
informative
reflective
slow-paced
4.25
At the start of the book, I was 100% sure this would be a 5 star read. Even though the words used for the patients are now considered slurs, the doctor still handled them with care and compassion, and recognised the ableism that is often present in neurodivergent people's lives. That was surprising to me, since even nowadays I hear doctors completely invalidate me, others, our experiences and trauma. I was so prepared to love this book. And I still love the first 15 or so chapters, those will always be dear to me, but damn, it really went downhill in the last couple of chapters... It felt like they were written by a completely different person. So condescending and dismissive, and it was incredibly hard to get through. Little moments of compassion still came through, but it felt like searching in the trash for food that hasn't rotted. It was really disappointing and somewhat triggering to hear about people who weren't that different from me being called stupid and basically a waste of time and resources. I felt betrayed, since I had come to really like and trust the author. I'm not even sure how I feel about what the book ends on, I agree that society often decides an autistic person is useless and doesn't even give them the chance to show their skills and interests, to earn their place in society, but the way it was said felt so patronising. As if a disabled person is completely unable to do this by themselves, and need someone else to first give them permission. I understand that all this was written during a time where people were locked up simply for being different, so it definitely would have been a lot harder to do things by themselves back then.. but I feel like context could have been added. (the edition I listened to was released in 2019 and there were other edits in it, so I don't see why this couldn't have been one of them) I think this should be mandatory reading for people who want to learn about the struggles of neurodivergent people in the past, and recommended reading for people interested in psychology. The language used is pretty understandable but still scientific, and I can recall most of the disorders easily. This is well written, and I like it even though I'm disappointed with it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism
Moderate: Grief, Medical content, and Forced institutionalization
space_funk's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
informative
slow-paced
1.75
Content Warnings
Graphic: Mental illness, Forced institutionalization, and Ableism
carysisamelt's review against another edition
informative
reflective
sad
slow-paced
3.5
an extremely interesting book, even in the 21st century. however, there is a lot of things that made me uncomfortable when reading this, namely the use of the r-slur (though used as an actually medical term, someone should definitely revise this) and the complete inaccuracy when describing autism. i really liked the start but ending with the chapter “simpletons” (or name to that effect) left a sour taste in my mouth.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Ableism, Forced institutionalization, Mental illness, Medical trauma, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Suicide attempt, and Terminal illness
sunn_bleach's review against another edition
challenging
hopeful
informative
medium-paced
3.0
Interesting but in a way I didn’t expect. This is very much a neurology book written in the early 80s, with all the language and paradigms that implies. The dead-serious use of the word “retarded” and unironic appeals to Freud and Luria are kind of shocking for 40+ years later. But I’m kind of struck at how much Sacks so obviously cared for his patients as people, not just case studies. That kind of narrative is important for humanizing the humans we treat.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism, Forced institutionalization, Mental illness, Chronic illness, and Medical content
Minor: Schizophrenia/Psychosis and Panic attacks/disorders
zoebill96's review
challenging
informative
slow-paced
2.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Death of parent, Drug use, Chronic illness, Medical content, Body horror, Forced institutionalization, Medical trauma, and Injury/Injury detail
avadore's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
funny
informative
medium-paced
Not my favourite Oliver Sacks I have to say, but I think that's because the language is a lot more clinical and dated than everything else I have read by him. The empathy and love is still there though, just be prepared for words like 'imbecile' and 'retard' to be thrown around without the nuance I would usually expect.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Ableism, Chronic illness, and Forced institutionalization
therolypolybird's review against another edition
challenging
hopeful
sad
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism, Forced institutionalization, and Dementia
Minor: Medical content
lumsa's review against another edition
Content Warnings
Graphic: Ableism and Forced institutionalization
More...