The design and UX isn't done, Rob and Abbie, okkurrrr! 😌
kindlereads's review
1.0
It was a letter. It was difficult to read. It didn't have much of a plot and used limiting language cause he was talking to a specific person. Dumb part 2
fablesandwren's review against another edition
3.0
Sidenote: The reason for such vague and short and "eh" words on each of these books, is because I wasn't challenging the study of the Bible when I read these. I was challenging myself to read the whole Bible in a year because I knew it would be discipline to keep at it daily. I do, however, plan to pick up a book and study what it is saying. Those will be longer reads and more notes.
So here is my review from my "Read the Bible in a Year" challenge. Usually just snippets of thoughts and random things I liked about the book itself. Nothing in-depth.
So here is my review of 2 Corinthians!
Another letter and another one to help evaluate my life and soak in the greatest of God.
So here is my review from my "Read the Bible in a Year" challenge. Usually just snippets of thoughts and random things I liked about the book itself. Nothing in-depth.
So here is my review of 2 Corinthians!
Another letter and another one to help evaluate my life and soak in the greatest of God.
sweetheart_seer's review against another edition
4.0
Thankfully I enjoyed this one better than the first.
I underlined some sections and was a bit more invested in this one too.
I'm not sure what exactly it was about this that resonated more for me, but I know that it did.
It felt less preachy and more centered on what Jesus called us to do and how to be changed through Him than the previous one in that the previous one seemed to be more advise of the time in which the letter was written. Like this was more timeless and held up better though time? I don't know if that makes sense or not.
I felt a stronger message in this one overall.
I underlined some sections and was a bit more invested in this one too.
I'm not sure what exactly it was about this that resonated more for me, but I know that it did.
It felt less preachy and more centered on what Jesus called us to do and how to be changed through Him than the previous one in that the previous one seemed to be more advise of the time in which the letter was written. Like this was more timeless and held up better though time? I don't know if that makes sense or not.
I felt a stronger message in this one overall.
More...