Reviews

Victory: an island tale by Joseph Conrad

darioschmidt's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Ja, Herrgott: Ich gebe zu, dass dies hier der bislang schwächste Conrad Roman war und wer, wie Vladimir Nabokov es versuchte, seinen Rang als Jahrhundertautor zu bestreiten versucht, der sollte wenn möglich seine Kritik nicht etwa auf "Heart of Darkness" oder "Nostromo" stützen, sondern auf "Victory".

Conrad-Fans kommen jedoch trotzdem auf ihre Kosten. Motivisch sowohl ein Kommentar auf das Buch Genesis, als auch Shakespeares Tempest. Und sprachlich natürlich....also was soll man denn bitte auch vom größten Stilisten der englischen Sprache anderes erwarten. Top.

kdmr's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

iancarpenter's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I had heard so much about this book. Think Didion said she read it at least once a year and yet for me this is the most plodding, tedious and obvious of Conrad's books. Maybe the only one I haven't liked.

lwb's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Has the feel that John Huston was going for in Key Largo (Bogart-Bacall).

mamelia00's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

2.0

nnikif's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

В моем издании в комментариях подробно и, надо сказать, убедительно показано, сколько связанных с главной героиней сцен Конрад заимствовал у разных французских писателей. Не в порядке интертекста, а потому что, кажется, женщины были для него странными экзотическими существами, которых следует изучать по книгам специалистов.
Главный герой, последователь, так сказать, Шопенгауэра — наполовину жив, реален, наполовину иллюстрирует отвлеченные философские соображения.
И вся книга колеблется между разными состояниями: между пафосом и пошлостью, точностью языка и косноязычием, психологической глубиной и грубой поверхностностью.
В каком-то смысле, это делает чтение более поучительным: видишь, из какого сора собран текст, с помощью какого нехитрого реквизита показывается фокус — но все равно в какой-то момент замечаешь, что забыл про реквизит, а предъявленный номер действительно потрясает.

blueyorkie's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

This novel has the appearance of melodrama:
1. They are somewhat stereotypical characters.
2. The exoticism of the places is very relevant (the Indonesian archipelago and, more particularly, the imaginary island of Samburan).
3. The flight of a couple travels to this island.
4. The meeting with a trio of crooks is looking for a treasure enough to satisfy Western tastes at the beginning of the 20th century.
However, Victory requires from its readers special attention, a constant presence in its journey to grasp all the subtleties of the narration (there are several narrators who, most often, have a limited point of view of the events) and the complexity of both main characters, Axel Heyst and Alma (or Lena), who sometimes appear as tangible beings, sometimes as ghosts. Son of a philosopher, Heyst wishes to follow his father's principles in a posture of detachment, reducing the world to a simple spectacle. But his choice is ironically the cause of his downfall. Reality forces him to act because his attitude is a source of backbiting and petty rumors.
I'm talking about loss, and the novel is called Victory?...
That's another contradiction that gives all the flavor to Conradian novels.

black_october's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.5

Not Conrad's best. Ending was a bit lazy, I felt.

burritapal_1's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark informative sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

The whole review is a spoiler.

I used some of the parts of the introduction as a summary of the story, because, sometimes I have been reading so many books, so quickly, and I get so tired of making reviews of them. I just want to get on to the next book. However, if I don't make a review of them, and I see somewhere on reddit or somewhere that someone suggests a book, and I go, oh that sounds good. Then I'll look it up on Goodreads and I have read it! So you see, I don't remember the books I've read after a while. And sometimes I'll look up and see what my review says and I don't have anything, because it was before 2017, when I started doing reviews. I go dang it! I have no idea what I thought about this book. So I must do reviews. 
But for this review, I was sick and tired of writing reviews so I used some of the introduction to explain the storyline. But I gave credit where credit was due!

The protagonist's father is a pessimist, and looks on the world of humans as a waste (much as I do).
"His father was in an unexpectedly soft mood on that night, when the moon swam in the cloudless sky over the beGrimed Shadows of the town.
'You still believe in something, then?' He said in a clear voice, which had been growing feeble of late. 'you believe in flesh and blood, perhaps? A full and Equitable contempt would soon do away with that, too. But since you have not attained to it, I advise you to cultivate that form of contempt which is called pity. It is perhaps the least difficult - always remembering that you, too, if you are anything, are as pititiful as the rest, yet never expecting any pity for yourself.'
'What is one to do, then?' sighed the young man, regarding his father, rigid in the high-backed chair. 
'look on - make no sound,' were the last words of the man who had spent his life in Blowing blasts upon a terrible trumpet which had filled Heaven and Earth with ruins, while mankind went on its way unheeding."

When Heyst's father dies, 
"his son buried the silenced destroyer of systems, of hopes, of beliefs. He observed that the death of that bitter contemner of Life did not trouble the flow of life's dream, where men and women go by thick as dust, revolving and jostling one another like figures cut out of cork and weighted with lead just sufficiently to keep them in their proudly upright posture."

"Axel Heyst lives by a philosophy taught him by his father, a Swedish aristocrat who viewed the human world as a place of pain and illusion. Under the influence of this view of things - a version of the philosophy of the nineteenth-century German pessimist Arthur Schopenhauer Heyst aims to drift through life in solitude. As long as he remains without any human ties, he believes he can avoid being defeated by the world.
"Heyst's wanderings take him to the Far East, where he meets a sea captain who has been framed by the Portuguese authorities and risks losing his boat. Heyst saves him from ruin and in an act of gratitude the captain sets up a company on the island of Samburan with Heyst as manager, but the company fails, and Heyst lives on in a derelict compound with only a Chinese servant for company. Heyst strays from his life of non- involvement for a second time when he meets a frightened young Englishwoman, Lena, who is working in the orchestra of a Java hotel, whose proprietor is infatuated with her."--From the Introduction, by John Gray

" 'have you forgotten, then? What did you expect to find? I know what sort of girl I am; but all the same I am not the sort that men turn their backs on - and you ought to know it, unless you aren't made like the others. Oh, forgive me! You aren't like the others; you are like no one in the world I ever spoke to. Don't you care for me? Don't you see -?'
what he saw was that, white and spectral, she was putting out her arms to him out of the black Shadows like an appealing ghost. He took her hands, and was affected, almost surprised, to find them so warm, so real, so firm, so living to his grasp. He drew her to him, and she dropped her head on his shoulder with a deep sigh.
'I am dead tired,' she whispered plaintively."

"Moved again by pity but also by desire, Heyst helps Lena escape and takes her back with him to Samburan, where they live together, but neither is entirely happy - Heyst because he regrets that he has formed a human tie, Lena because she is not sure that he is fully committed to her."--From the Introduction,  by John Gray
Talking to Lena about his father...
" '... Later he discovered - how am I to explain it to you? Suppose the world were a factory and all mankind Workmen in it. Well, he discovered that the wages were not good enough. That they were paid in counterfeit money.'
'I see!' The girl said slowly. 
'Do you?'
Heyst, who had been speaking as if to himself,  looked up curiously.
'It wasn't a new discovery, but he brought his capacity for scorn to bear on it. It was immense. It ought to have withered this globe. I don't know how many minds he convinced. But my mind was very young then, and youth I suppose can be easily seduced - even by a negation....' "

"Yet their lives passed peacefully together. This tranquil life is disrupted by the arrival of three armed desperados, who have heard from the hotel owner - now a mortal enemy of Heyst's - that the Swedish recluse has amassed a fortune, which he keeps with him on the island. Suspecting Lena is in danger, Heyst keeps her presence secret from the group; but one of the men knows she is on the island and goes to the bungalow where she is hiding. Heyst persuades the leader of the group, Gentleman Jones, that there is no treasure to be found and tells him of his accomplice's designs on Lena. 
The two men go to the bungalow, where Lena"(--From the Introduction, by John Gray)
has been given the knife. She is pretending, to Ricardo, that she likes him and is going along with him, so that she can protect Heyst.
"Jones, who loathes women and believes his accomplice has betrayed him, fires a shot that grazes the accomplice and fatally wounds Lena. Believing she has saved his life, Lena hands Heyst the knife. But Heyst believes she has betrayed him and finding her hit by the bullet, he realizes she is dying. Still wedded to his philosophy of detachment, he cannot give her the declaration of love for which she asks; but when he takes her in his arms she dies triumphant, believing he had responded to her plea. Asking to be left alone, Heyst sets fire to the bungalow and is found dead next to Lena's body.

"The story ends with a friendly sea captain, who made a practice of looking in on the island to see if Heyst was well, describing what he had found to a colonial official, and concluding: 'There was nothing to be done... Nothing!'

"The novel's last words may be a reference to the closing lines of Schopenhauer's main philosophical treatise, The World as Will and Idea:
... to those in whom the world has turned about and denied itself, this world of ours, real as it is, with all its suns and galaxies, is - nothing."--From the Introduction, by John Gray

I loved this book. I loved the characters of Heyst and Lena. But in the end, Heyst was like every other man, who so easily believes wrong of a woman who loves him.

progumball's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75