Scan barcode
camilla_p's review against another edition
adventurous
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
- The progression of clues in the story a lot of the time felt like they were just being created to hit a page count rather than cohesive story
- I get the intended meaning, and I appreciate it to some degree, but at the same time, I didn’t appreciate how the book invalidated pretty much any religion
- There were some concepts that I think could’ve been much more fleshed out instead of going through these winding rabbit hole
- I understand every character had their own secrets to keep and motivations, but if the plot is so dependent upon them cooperating, I don’t understand why there wasn’t more of an effort made that happen
michaelaaa_'s review against another edition
adventurous
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
danoreading's review against another edition
3.0
The Lost Symbol is written in pretty much the same format and style as The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons, but I found this novel to be the weakest of the three. The writing is not great, as with the other novels, and I found myself wishing that the ending of the book were a bit more like National Treasure - instead, it ends up being a little too much like the Battlestar Galactica finale.
dr2danielr's review against another edition
2.0
I am afraid that I can't value this book with more than (just) two stars. The story centres about a little pyramid that gives clues where a precious treasure can be found. But when we finally find out to what the pyramid leads us, I can't help a feeling of major anti-climax. The treasure is supposed to be a wealth of incredible knowledge and wisdom that the bright minds of hundreds of years ago had. Strangely, they all want to hide the knowledge (Why?). With this book, Dan Brown even wants us the belief that today's science is going into directions that somehow was already known a long time ago. I think that he should focus more on real science. In the end of the book, we read that the treasure (all that wisdom) is buried at the foot of the Washington Monument and is the bible. The book is all about deciphering an insanely complicated code and then it leads to this! What an anti-climax. And why would we want to hide that so deeply? No, this book didn't impress me. I enjoyed the Davinci Code and Angels and Demons, but this book will not be on my favourite list.
afeaster's review against another edition
challenging
inspiring
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
skynet666's review against another edition
4.0
I could have sworn I read this one, but guess I never did. It was a good listen.
libraryforspooky's review against another edition
3.0
This book fulfills District of Columbia in a self reading challenge of a book taking place in every US State or territory (4/56).
Dan Brown’s "The Lost Symbol" is a fast-paced thriller that once again plunges readers into the world of symbologist Robert Langdon. Set against the backdrop of Washington D.C., the novel explores themes of secrets, history, and the quest for enlightenment. While it contains many of the elements that made Brown’s earlier works successful, it falls short of the high standards set by its predecessors, earning it a three-star rating.
The novel opens with Langdon being summoned to the U.S. Capitol to decipher the mysterious and gruesome appearance of a severed hand, tattooed with ancient symbols. This event sets off a chain of events that involves Masonic secrets, hidden codes, and a race against time to prevent a national crisis. Langdon, accompanied by the brilliant scientist Katherine Solomon, must navigate a labyrinth of clues that lead them deep into the heart of America’s founding history.
One of the strengths of "The Lost Symbol" is Brown’s meticulous research and ability to weave historical facts with fiction. The novel is rich with information about Freemasonry, Washington D.C.’s architecture, and various scientific and philosophical concepts. This attention to detail creates an immersive experience for readers who enjoy learning while they read.
However, the novel also suffers from several notable weaknesses. The plot, while engaging, follows a formulaic structure that feels overly familiar to readers of Brown’s previous works. The sense of déjà vu is hard to shake as Langdon encounters yet another series of puzzles and cryptic messages that must be solved to save the day. This repetition can make the novel feel less fresh and more predictable.
Character development is another area where "The Lost Symbol" falls short. While Robert Langdon remains a likable and intelligent protagonist, his character lacks significant growth or new dimensions. Katherine Solomon, though an interesting addition, does not receive enough development to fully engage the reader. The antagonist, Mal’akh, is certainly menacing and driven, but his motivations and backstory feel somewhat contrived and lack the depth needed to make him truly memorable.
The pacing of the novel is uneven, with certain sections dragging due to excessive exposition and others rushing through key plot points. While the action sequences and cliffhangers keep the momentum going, the frequent interruptions for lengthy explanations can disrupt the flow and diminish the sense of urgency.
Despite these flaws, "The Lost Symbol" does have its moments of excitement and intrigue. The exploration of Masonic lore and the hidden symbolism within Washington D.C. offers a fascinating backdrop that adds a layer of depth to the story. Brown’s ability to create a sense of mystery and suspense is still evident, and fans of his work will find familiar pleasures in the novel’s puzzles and historical references.
In summary, "The Lost Symbol" by Dan Brown is an entertaining thriller that delivers the expected mix of history, mystery, and action. However, it lacks the originality and character depth that made Brown’s earlier works, such as "The Da Vinci Code" and "Angels & Demons," so compelling. A three-star rating reflects its status as a solid but ultimately underwhelming addition to the Robert Langdon series. Fans of Brown’s previous books will likely enjoy the ride, but may find themselves longing for the freshness and innovation of his earlier novels.
Dan Brown’s "The Lost Symbol" is a fast-paced thriller that once again plunges readers into the world of symbologist Robert Langdon. Set against the backdrop of Washington D.C., the novel explores themes of secrets, history, and the quest for enlightenment. While it contains many of the elements that made Brown’s earlier works successful, it falls short of the high standards set by its predecessors, earning it a three-star rating.
The novel opens with Langdon being summoned to the U.S. Capitol to decipher the mysterious and gruesome appearance of a severed hand, tattooed with ancient symbols. This event sets off a chain of events that involves Masonic secrets, hidden codes, and a race against time to prevent a national crisis. Langdon, accompanied by the brilliant scientist Katherine Solomon, must navigate a labyrinth of clues that lead them deep into the heart of America’s founding history.
One of the strengths of "The Lost Symbol" is Brown’s meticulous research and ability to weave historical facts with fiction. The novel is rich with information about Freemasonry, Washington D.C.’s architecture, and various scientific and philosophical concepts. This attention to detail creates an immersive experience for readers who enjoy learning while they read.
However, the novel also suffers from several notable weaknesses. The plot, while engaging, follows a formulaic structure that feels overly familiar to readers of Brown’s previous works. The sense of déjà vu is hard to shake as Langdon encounters yet another series of puzzles and cryptic messages that must be solved to save the day. This repetition can make the novel feel less fresh and more predictable.
Character development is another area where "The Lost Symbol" falls short. While Robert Langdon remains a likable and intelligent protagonist, his character lacks significant growth or new dimensions. Katherine Solomon, though an interesting addition, does not receive enough development to fully engage the reader. The antagonist, Mal’akh, is certainly menacing and driven, but his motivations and backstory feel somewhat contrived and lack the depth needed to make him truly memorable.
The pacing of the novel is uneven, with certain sections dragging due to excessive exposition and others rushing through key plot points. While the action sequences and cliffhangers keep the momentum going, the frequent interruptions for lengthy explanations can disrupt the flow and diminish the sense of urgency.
Despite these flaws, "The Lost Symbol" does have its moments of excitement and intrigue. The exploration of Masonic lore and the hidden symbolism within Washington D.C. offers a fascinating backdrop that adds a layer of depth to the story. Brown’s ability to create a sense of mystery and suspense is still evident, and fans of his work will find familiar pleasures in the novel’s puzzles and historical references.
In summary, "The Lost Symbol" by Dan Brown is an entertaining thriller that delivers the expected mix of history, mystery, and action. However, it lacks the originality and character depth that made Brown’s earlier works, such as "The Da Vinci Code" and "Angels & Demons," so compelling. A three-star rating reflects its status as a solid but ultimately underwhelming addition to the Robert Langdon series. Fans of Brown’s previous books will likely enjoy the ride, but may find themselves longing for the freshness and innovation of his earlier novels.
karenholmes's review against another edition
3.0
I had read and enjoyed The Da Vinci Code back in time when it first came out. I remembered the thrill of discovering layers of meaning and the twists and turns of the story. I knew Dan Brown isn't known for his good writing, but he had quite a decent comand of sentences and achieved milions of readers eager for more.
It's been a while since I read the first one. I haven't read the second one, but as they are standalones and I had the chance to read this one, I grabbed it and started to read. I don't know what I was expecting but that lot of info dumps, that twists that I could see comming from the beginning and characters I don't feel alive.
Maybe I was so eager to see the construction of the plot, that I didn't feel the enjoyment of reading. But those info dumps, those conversations between characters feel so awkard that I don't know if another writer could get away with it.
It's been a while since I read the first one. I haven't read the second one, but as they are standalones and I had the chance to read this one, I grabbed it and started to read. I don't know what I was expecting but that lot of info dumps, that twists that I could see comming from the beginning and characters I don't feel alive.
Maybe I was so eager to see the construction of the plot, that I didn't feel the enjoyment of reading. But those info dumps, those conversations between characters feel so awkard that I don't know if another writer could get away with it.