crasscasualty's review against another edition
2.0
Very sketchy profiles told without real attempt at overarching theme. I nevertheless enjoyed reading it as I waited for a delayed plane.
luna_rondo's review against another edition
2.0
Did someone not give this to an editor? Because it desperately needed to be given to one. It read like a thesis statement that went wildly off track.
Interesting stories, but could have been expanded.
Interesting stories, but could have been expanded.
caralawless's review against another edition
3.0
A fun romp but not quite historically accurate or as well-researched as I'd like. The author clearly has her own opinion on these "princesses" and her opinion is too much shaded by her own time and social mores to really stand as a historic research project. However, it was a fun read and I'm sure the amateur historian would get a kick out it.
erinj254's review against another edition
2.0
I listened to this in the car. There were a few interesting parts but she covered SO MANY people, very briefly, that it was really difficult to keep up. The most fascinating part was the very end when she talked about the Polish factory worker who pretended to be the lost Princess Anastasia, and the brief mention of Noor Inayat Khan, the Spy Princess.
ashnight's review against another edition
5.0
Really liked to bits of information. Was a fun book to read and very informative. there could always be more.
stories's review against another edition
informative
lighthearted
fast-paced
3.0
An intriguing mix of various characters throughout history.
erin_oriordan_is_reading_again's review against another edition
4.0
Does anyone else remember [b:Uppity Women of Medieval Times|572893|Uppity Women of Medieval Times|Vicki León|http://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/books/1278142196s/572893.jpg|559910] and some of the other titles that [a:Vicki León|308223|Vicki León|http://www.goodreads.com/assets/nophoto/user/f_50x66-e0ba3b90c110cd67123d6a850d85373e.png] and some others used to write for Conari Press (now part of Red Wheel/Weiser)? There was a whole series in the 1990s that sought to fight the erasure of herstory by bringing to light some of the lesser-known, but fascinating, women in history. This book is like a mini-course in that. Like the Uppity Women series (its foremother), this book divides the women into categories, such as Warriors, Partiers, and Madwomen, rather than proceeding in strict chronological order. It focuses mainly on European history - the Germano-British House of Hanover seems to be a favorite subject - but is just multicultural enough to pass the sniff test.
The writing style is very informal, which some reviewers have disliked (one compared it to the tone of a gossip magazine), and I have to say, I see their point. I think what bothered me the most was that some of the passages about allegedly promiscuous princess took on what I felt was too judgmental a tone. (To be fair, Napoleon and some of the Hanover kings get a little slut-shamed, too, so it isn't a particularly gender-biased strain of judgement.)
If you can forgive a narrative whose voice can, at times, be a bit intrusive, and you're a young person considering a history or women's studies major, or you're fascinating with history as a hobby, or you're a not-necessarily-younger person who's fascinated with royalty in general or who wants to brush up on some of the lesser-known women in political history, I recommend this book to you as a good jumping-on point. If you find a favorite, I'm sure you'll go on to research her in more depth.
Another complaint I noticed in briefly skimming over some previous reviews was that not all the women in the book are, strictly speaking, princesses. Some of them are impostors, or from cultures without a formalized system of royal titles, and some of them (especially in the early chapters) are legendary figures who may not have basis in historical fact. This part didn't particularly bother me; if Rodriguez McRobbie had stuck to a very formal definition of princesshood, the book would almost certainly have been more Eurocentric and less interesting. I'm fairly happy with her selections, and with the depth of information she got into with most of them. I do think we need (frequent) reminders that history was never a male-only affair, so I appreciate the efforts of books such as these. I would buy it for my nieces, but I'd also try to get them to retain as just one part of a larger women's history bookshelf.
I received an advance reading copy of this book through the Amazon Vine Program at no charge in exchange for this review. I was not otherwise compensation for this review, which is my own honest opinion.
The writing style is very informal, which some reviewers have disliked (one compared it to the tone of a gossip magazine), and I have to say, I see their point. I think what bothered me the most was that some of the passages about allegedly promiscuous princess took on what I felt was too judgmental a tone. (To be fair, Napoleon and some of the Hanover kings get a little slut-shamed, too, so it isn't a particularly gender-biased strain of judgement.)
If you can forgive a narrative whose voice can, at times, be a bit intrusive, and you're a young person considering a history or women's studies major, or you're fascinating with history as a hobby, or you're a not-necessarily-younger person who's fascinated with royalty in general or who wants to brush up on some of the lesser-known women in political history, I recommend this book to you as a good jumping-on point. If you find a favorite, I'm sure you'll go on to research her in more depth.
Another complaint I noticed in briefly skimming over some previous reviews was that not all the women in the book are, strictly speaking, princesses. Some of them are impostors, or from cultures without a formalized system of royal titles, and some of them (especially in the early chapters) are legendary figures who may not have basis in historical fact. This part didn't particularly bother me; if Rodriguez McRobbie had stuck to a very formal definition of princesshood, the book would almost certainly have been more Eurocentric and less interesting. I'm fairly happy with her selections, and with the depth of information she got into with most of them. I do think we need (frequent) reminders that history was never a male-only affair, so I appreciate the efforts of books such as these. I would buy it for my nieces, but I'd also try to get them to retain as just one part of a larger women's history bookshelf.
I received an advance reading copy of this book through the Amazon Vine Program at no charge in exchange for this review. I was not otherwise compensation for this review, which is my own honest opinion.