Scan barcode
Reviews tagging 'Chronic illness'
The Lady from the Black Lagoon: Hollywood Monsters and the Lost Legacy of Milicent Patrick by Mallory O'Meara
1 review
talonsontypewriters's review
informative
medium-paced
1.5
In an early chapter, O'Meara mentions angrily that some people were dubious that Milicent Patrick's life story could "fill an entire book." In setting out to disprove that, she unfortunately seems to have done the opposite, since the bulk of this book doesn't really feel like it's about Milicent Patrick at all.
Instead, we're treated to lengthy paragraphs about supporting members of Milicent's life -- do we really need that much backstory on William Randolph Hearst (whom O'Meara assumes readers won't know of aside from as the inspiration for Citizen Kane, which feels strange to me) to understand his wife's friendship with young Milicent? -- and O'Meara's own experiences, including many not related to her search for information. The former could have been heavily cut down to the relevant details, and the latter could have been interesting... as an introduction and/or afterword, rather than dispersed throughout the book. Quips and subjective interpretations overwhelm the actual facts, making it difficult to tell what can be gleaned from the records and what comes down to O'Meara's thoughts (and projection).
There's also quite a bit of repetition (so many sentences start with "Remember"), particularly regarding bigotry and abuse. Like, I guarantee you just about anyone interested in this book understands sexism is bad and was rampant in the 1950s. Any sense of intersectionality toward that, additionally, comes across as lip service; the seeming implication that a non-feminine woman would be more easily accepted into spaces dominated by cishet white men than a glamorous woman in "sparkling pumps" particularly rankled. Maybe I'm oversensitive as a butch lesbian who hates that kind of take, but your personal relationship with dressing up/makeup does not magically erase the standards of conventional femininity women (especially marginalized women) are forced to uphold.
O'Meara does note that Milicent's race, gender/sexuality, appearance (which she comments positively upon in the same breath she criticizes others for focusing on), and social status enabled her opportunities other women didn't and still don't get -- but fails to really delve into that. If the main point really was to simply describe Milicent Patrick's life and work, that would have been fine, but if there's room for everything else I've mentioned... why not add another layer of social commentary?
A Portuguese man is also described in passing as a person of color? I admittedly haven't seen The Creature from the Black Lagoon yet, so maybe his character there is Indigenous, but odd either way.
All that contributes to a sense of complete disorganization, to the level that I genuinely questioned if anyone had edited/proofed this multiple times. There is some interesting information about Milicent Patrick's life in here, but I do feel I could have learned the same from a more concise, focused article. In short, a super interesting premise and person overrun by tangents and an obnoxiously quirky narrative voice.
Instead, we're treated to lengthy paragraphs about supporting members of Milicent's life -- do we really need that much backstory on William Randolph Hearst (whom O'Meara assumes readers won't know of aside from as the inspiration for Citizen Kane, which feels strange to me) to understand his wife's friendship with young Milicent? -- and O'Meara's own experiences, including many not related to her search for information. The former could have been heavily cut down to the relevant details, and the latter could have been interesting... as an introduction and/or afterword, rather than dispersed throughout the book. Quips and subjective interpretations overwhelm the actual facts, making it difficult to tell what can be gleaned from the records and what comes down to O'Meara's thoughts (and projection).
There's also quite a bit of repetition (so many sentences start with "Remember"), particularly regarding bigotry and abuse. Like, I guarantee you just about anyone interested in this book understands sexism is bad and was rampant in the 1950s. Any sense of intersectionality toward that, additionally, comes across as lip service; the seeming implication that a non-feminine woman would be more easily accepted into spaces dominated by cishet white men than a glamorous woman in "sparkling pumps" particularly rankled. Maybe I'm oversensitive as a butch lesbian who hates that kind of take, but your personal relationship with dressing up/makeup does not magically erase the standards of conventional femininity women (especially marginalized women) are forced to uphold.
O'Meara does note that Milicent's race, gender/sexuality, appearance (which she comments positively upon in the same breath she criticizes others for focusing on), and social status enabled her opportunities other women didn't and still don't get -- but fails to really delve into that. If the main point really was to simply describe Milicent Patrick's life and work, that would have been fine, but if there's room for everything else I've mentioned... why not add another layer of social commentary?
A Portuguese man is also described in passing as a person of color? I admittedly haven't seen The Creature from the Black Lagoon yet, so maybe his character there is Indigenous, but odd either way.
All that contributes to a sense of complete disorganization, to the level that I genuinely questioned if anyone had edited/proofed this multiple times. There is some interesting information about Milicent Patrick's life in here, but I do feel I could have learned the same from a more concise, focused article. In short, a super interesting premise and person overrun by tangents and an obnoxiously quirky narrative voice.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Misogyny and Sexism
Moderate: Chronic illness and Sexual harassment
Minor: Cancer, Death, Infertility, Infidelity, Racism, Rape, Sexual assault, and Suicide