Reviews

The Cactus League by Emily Nemens

janey's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Well done! This brought back memories of stories told by an old friend, without the silver linings that he always found. I agree with the blurbs that say this doesn't read like a first novel.

p_t_b's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

this is a review of myself and not of this book. i have too many opinions about the cultural meanings of baseball as well as the consumer politics of literature to be fair to this book. i am a 60% good human being

sarahastrid3's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I didn't finish this. I was just tired of seeing it on my reading list. I don't think I ever will finish it. It was boring. I don't care so much that it wasn't about baseball as some others have said. I care that they kept introducing people and I was tired of keeping track. I love baseball, I love Spring Training in Arizona. I wanted so much more from this.

supertenn115's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

22reader22's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.0

Deeply misogynistic. The bad women of the book neglect children, manipulate men, focus on attaining body privilege, or just whimper and simper. The only good woman character in the book is a nursing mother who stays away from the other baseball wives and girlfriends, is devoted to her husband, and uses English in the author's wrong idea of how a Spanish-as-first-language speaker would. It's not diversity if a character is just there to be a cardboard stereotype. This is a book for people who want their ugly stereotypes about women confirmed. The author seems to feel the characters are more complicated than the good-bad dichotomy I've addressed here, but they really aren't. It's a college writing exercise printed in novel form.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lilly71490's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

cody240fc's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Most people are probably going to focus on Nemens’ use of the multiple POV, a structure she utilizes with much success (except for the chapter centering around the team owner with a bruised ego, as well the chapter focusing on the players’ wives). Nemens appears to have logged some time at spring training herself, and she paints the whole mess with clear lines for us readers.

What really stood out to me, however, was the tone Nemens sets throughout the story. This is not a story of redemption, nor is it a story of doom and gloom. With ‘The Cactus League’ Nemens gives us the hint that things might turn out all right, but in a likelihood probably not.

A couple of readers have mentioned that baseball really is a perfect metaphor for life, and I tend to agree. Nemens does the game justice. A promising debut. Solid three stars.

emulator's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jorsarian's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful lighthearted reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

lbolesta's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Nothing WRONG with this one, but books where the POV changes each chapter and never goes back to revisit a character always feel unfinished to me (contrast with how well this is done in Trouble the Saints).