Scan barcode
apersonfromflorida's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Animal death, Death, and Gore
Minor: Sexual violence
isacro's review against another edition
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Death, Gore, Suicide, Torture, Violence, Blood, Excrement, Cannibalism, Abandonment, and Pandemic/Epidemic
falibat's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, and Death
Moderate: Blood and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Drug abuse and Sexual assault
clario6372's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Death, and War
Moderate: Abandonment
katharina90's review against another edition
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
4.0
The plot was a bit weak, esp. towards the middle where I lost interest for a while, but then the ending is very sweet and hopeful.
I thought the narrator was hilarious even though it's a silly, immature type of humor I don't usually go for. I guess you can get away with it if you're a crow.
As someone who used to live in Seattle, I also greatly enjoyed the references to local geography, flora and fauna.
Moderate: Animal death, Death, and Violence
Minor: Fatphobia
melsnyder89's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Death, Violence, and Blood
amelia_horseman's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Gore, and Blood
Moderate: Suicide and Abandonment
jesssalexander's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
A sweetly naïve and hopeful, foul-mouthed crow (fowl-mouthed?) seeks to save fellow pets from a zombie apocalypse. I do not recommend that any one read this, it is bizarre and maybe the most gory thing I’ve ever read— really and truly, if you do read this, don’t do so while eating anything.
In a crude and VERY macabre way it is funny. Not hilarious but I did chuckle at S.T.’s (the crow) colorful and creative descriptions. The thing that kept me from stopping was how weirdly poignant the narrative was. Lots of lines like this:
“Those who burst from the shell know the gladiators fight for survival. A bird recognizes that every life that surpasses a first breath is a miracle.”
And Buxton can really write characters. There are all these little vignettes stuck between the chapters of the main narrative about different domesticated animals experiences with the apocalypse. My favorites were Genghis Cat and Winnie the Poodle. Though some of the little side stories felt more like an interruption to get through rather than any substantial addition to the storyline.
What’s really clever about the story is the underlying commentary. No, not the obvious warning that human kind succumbed to a zombie virus transferred through phone addiction. (The science behind which was as far-fetched as the image of a limp-winged crow flying on the back of a bald eagle on the heels of a mob of evolving raptor-human zombies. Which is also a part of the plot. Really got to just ride the crazy train with this book). But no. What’s clever is how S.T. earnestly and endearingly loved humans and mourns their passing when he was raised by a less than exemplary member of our species: Big Jim. Big Jim, who scoffed at tofu and penguins, whose most significant life event seemed to have been being dumped by Tiffany S. from Tinder, who refers to everyone as a MoFo and named his own pet Sh*t turd- S.T. for short. Even the most mediocre of us are pretty amazing, we are all God’s creatures (my take, not necessarily Buxton’s) and each day of life is a gift.
Graphic: Death, Gore, Violence, and Pandemic/Epidemic
antimony's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
4.0
also i don't get how there weren't kids running around, like 6 year olds who havent had a chance to get addicted to screens or older kids with strict parents who won't let them have a phone or even a tablet...not to mention obviously the animals wouldn't really encounter them considering that this was set in seattle but what about the amish. how did they fare when it was screens and tech that turned other people into zombies? what about old people who can barely figure out their flip phone and are certainly not addicted to smartphones or computers? i am all for screen addiciton being a dangerous plague but like i do not think it would affect everyone so thoroughly.
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Death, and Gore
3martini's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Animal death, Cursing, Death, Gore, Blood, and Pandemic/Epidemic
Moderate: Drug abuse, Excrement, Vomit, Grief, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail