Reviews with content warning for Vomit - American Psycho

The best book I have ever read. I can say this with confidence. I could go on for hours about this book. The best i can describe it is: A brilliant, enigmatic satire of 80s yuppie culture, filled to the brim with horrific displays of violence and grotesqueness. (while deeply disturbing, absolutely necessary to the book’s theme of stretching the limits of societal boundaries, and seeing just how much money and status can get you out of.) Before reading this book of course I had seen the movie, and I had heard that the book was extremely graphic. I didn’t grasp just how graphic it truly was. The book had me in full fledged tears at multiple parts. I had to set it down for hours and take breaks. Don’t let this dismay you because the book is nothing short of a masterpiece. It’s fairly fast paced, but unlike the movie, Paul Owen’s (Paul Allen in the movie) murder is not necessarily the main plot or the reason Bateman really spirals into insanity. In fact, Owen’s death scene is only 3 or so paragraphs long, and is not discussed very many times (However it is one of the only murders he is suspected or even asked about). If you enjoyed the movie, the book will turn your world upside down. I highly highly recommend this book to anyone who loves the movie as much as I do. While the movie is great, it just doesn’t do the book justice. There’s only so much you can fit into a 2 hour movie, especially without confusing the audience too much. I’d say only about 45% of whats in the book made it into the movie. And trust me, if you liked Patrick Bateman’s character, or even related to him in the movie, you will not be able to defend this man once you read the book. I believe Christian Bale’s portrayal of Patrick Bateman was made humorous and much more charismatic in order to connect to the audience. I don’t think as many people would be making “sigma” edits of him if they knew the Patrick Bateman Bret Easton Ellis wrote. Don’t get me wrong, Bale’s performance as Bateman was outstanding, but it definitely humanizes him more, and I think that was done on purpose. A fair warning though, if you have a weak stomach or cannot handle extreme, again, EXTREME over the top gore and violence, definitely don’t read the book. I can handle seeing gore on TV, but for some reason, the way Bateman describes it, and seeing it through his eyes, had some effects on me. I had a visceral reaction to this book every 20 pages. However, if you’ve been a fan of the movie for years, and you just want to know more and feel like you didn’t get the full story (you didn’t), read the book! A solid 11/10 for me *personally*. Bateman is even pretty funny at times for casually dropping the most insane information mid sentence. Anyways, if you’re concerned, i’ll add warnings for things that you might not wanna read about:
Many scenes of racism and homophobia, racist and homophobic slurs often used, extremely detailed depictions of death and murder, cannibalism, animal torture, drug use, a LOT of verbal violence, descriptions and mentions of R*pe, extremely disturbing (lets just say “creative”) deaths and torture. I cannot emphasize this enough, but the murder scenes of women just get more and more intense as the book goes on. Im sure i can say more, but that is my basic review of American Psycho. 10/10, ruined my life and desensitized me forever! <3

Content Warnings

waltjessexo's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

the point is that it's disturbing and on-the-nose, but it being "the point" doesn't mean you have to call it a good book. it accomplishes making you feel horrified and is necessary art but it's normal to not enjoy it anyway.

Content Warnings

maybbrenna's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

fascinating way of writing, really captures the essence of a psychopath, but i have never been so disgusted by a book in my life. i now understand why this book is considered one of the most disturbing. never read something more bleak and hopeless in my life. i would go back to do a “slur/hate crime” count but i would rather shoot myself in the foot than ever read this again. i’d give it two stars, but there were some parts where I was still interested near the end and in the beginning, but over all, jesus fucking Christ. i need to start reading romance or something.

Content Warnings

synclaire's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.75

Content Warnings

mollandra's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

literally the most gruesome book i’ve ever read. i was peeking through my hands to read some of it. the critique is good and it’s always fun to read source material (movie and stage musical both take a lot of verbatim passages) and find notable exclusions.

Content Warnings

beyondthevalley's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark funny medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Really loving going through Ellis' work although this made me nauseous and viscerally upset multiple times. Was a bit surreal reading this as someone with harm OCD because strangely Ellis portrays intrusive thoughts pitch-perfectly here — just with a man for whom they are not ego-dystonic for.

Probably taking a mini-Ellis break though it is not good for the psyche to take all this in at once! However it's worth noting that he has great humor and commentary on the excess and sociopathy of rich young white men who all strive for a paradoxical individuality through rigid conformity to the point of constantly being confused for each other, and seeing him touch ever so slightly on the early 90s and the descent from that peak was an interesting touch not seen in Less Than Zero.

Content Warnings

jade_smith's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Okay, I have a lot to say about this book.

Much of which is indelibly shaped by my experience borrowing it from the library. In Australia, this book is heavily restricted. I had to show ID to prove that I'm over 18 (I seldom get ID'd buying alcohol anymore, so this was both flattering and amusing). The librarian then retrieved the book from back of house, and handed it to me in a sealed opaque bag, with strict instructions regarding the handling and returning of the book. She was equally bemused by the whole process.

The censorship of this book in Australia is genuinely baffling. To steal a quote from Irvine Walsh's introduction to the 2012 edition: "This is one of the great hypocrisies of our cultural life. Copious gore and representations of the dismemberment of young women are considered fair game in the name of mass entertainment, yet deemed unacceptable as devices of metaphor and symbol in a critical and conceptual (if also visceral), state-of-the-nation novel."

This book was unarguably graphic. I have a high tolerance for gore, and would not recommend this book to anyone who is even slightly squeamish. But also... perhaps I would. Because I think there is value in discomfort. And this novel is nothing if not uncomfortable. And that discomfort is core to it's success as the most brilliantly biting satire of American consumerism, greed, and chauvinism that I've ever read.

I did a bit of research into feminist critiques of this novel from the time of it's release in the 1990's, and while I get what they're saying... I kinda totally disagree. The character of Patrick Bateman is misogynistic. This novel is not misogynistic -- to me, it's quite clearly an indictment of the behaviour of "men like that." Good satire takes things to the extreme. And indeed, is this not the most extreme manifestation of the "misogynistic comments amongst mates" to femicide pipeline?

It was also incredibly funny. Patrick Bateman is one of the most pathetic point of view characters I've ever read, and there are points at which his ineptitude and insecurity provide points of genuinely brilliant black comedy.

There's something that I want to say here about this novel in a post-Trump age -- the way in which 1980's business mogul Trump is a near-mythologized figure in the eyes of Patrick Bateman. There's something here about how the cruelty, callousness, and selfishness of Bateman and his contemporaries has wormed it's way into 21st Century American society. There's something here about aesthetic consumption and ideology.

There's also something here about the way in which Patrick Bateman is constantly saying the quiet part out loud -- blatantly admitting to his associates that he's a serial killer. There's an ambiguity as to whether these deliberate slips are real, or whether they're part of Bateman's unreliable narration. But, if we are to assume that in the context of this novel as an exaggeration and as a satire that they are in-universe dialogue -- there's something here about how these people are willing to brush over and justify the articulation of the most callous tendencies, on account of the fact that they just don't care. Bateman feels and says externally what all of these people feel and say internally. There's something here about the rise of blatantly fascist dialogue in the USA. Perhaps we now live in a world full of Patrick Bateman's.

Anyway -- I truly have so much more I could say about this book. I'm glad I read it. I want to write an essay on it. I'm preemptively mortified by the fact of returning this to the library in it's opaque sleeve. If I ever start referencing a need to return library books at odd hours, know that I've gone the way of Bateman. And perhaps then the Australian government will feel justified in their censorship of this novel, for truly they must think it has some near-mystical ability to instigate harm.

Content Warnings

kimberlydrabik's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

More...