Reviews tagging 'Classism'

Our Hideous Progeny by C.E. McGill

20 reviews

natahoochie's review against another edition

adventurous dark emotional hopeful inspiring mysterious sad tense medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? Yes
• Loveable characters? It's complicated
• Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Coulda been gayer. 

---

Content Warnings

Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Gore, Blood, and Murder

Moderate: Child death, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Xenophobia, and Medical content

Minor: Chronic illness, Death, Violence, Grief, Death of parent, Fire/Fire injury, and Classism

hmatt's review against another edition

adventurous emotional mysterious tense slow-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? A mix
• Strong character development? It's complicated
• Loveable characters? It's complicated
• Diverse cast of characters? Yes

3.5

I love the concept of this novel: it's very original and a fun gothic take on historical fiction for the classical lit nerds. It does drag a bit in the middle for me, so I think it could have been shorter. The queer rep is there but only just barely, honestly, and I wish it had been explored more.

---

Content Warnings

Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Sexism, Blood, and Grief

Moderate: Child death, Chronic illness, Death, Toxic relationship, Fire/Fire injury, and Classism

Minor: Death of parent

klbreyfogle's review against another edition

adventurous dark emotional hopeful tense medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? It's complicated
• Loveable characters? It's complicated
• Diverse cast of characters? Yes
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

This was a wonderful read! Pretty dark, at times (both content-wise and thematically) but it was fun to read a queer woman in STEM Frankenstein spin-off and I appreciated the writing style. Lots of of-the-time misogyny and homophobia that can be rough, but I liked the ending (a happy ending imo) and

personally choose to believe that the monster made its way back to Scotland and lives on as the Loch Ness Monster

---

Content Warnings

Graphic: Animal death, Toxic relationship, Medical content, and Murder

Moderate: Child death, Death, Homophobia, Sexual assault, Blood, Death of parent, and Classism

sproutedpages's review against another edition

adventurous dark emotional informative reflective sad tense medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? A mix
• Strong character development? Yes
• Loveable characters? Yes
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Chronic illness representation: 

• Maise: migraines, asthma and lung issues, heart issues, history of childhood illness. 
• Mr. Jamsetjee: tremors (likely Parkinson's) referred to as “shaking palsy”.

---

Content Warnings

Graphic: Ableism, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Chronic illness, Emotional abuse, Gore, Gun violence, Misogyny, Racism, Toxic relationship, Blood, Death of parent, and Sexual harassment

Moderate: Drug use, Murder, and Classism

Minor: Miscarriage, Terminal illness, and Pregnancy

Discussion of phrenology (challenged) and racism in science, description of animal corpses and their decomposition (not overly graphic), description of surgical procedures on animal corpses, use of laudanum to treat chronic migraines, infant death/stillbirth

claraxmas's review against another edition

adventurous dark emotional inspiring mysterious reflective tense medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? A mix
• Strong character development? Yes
• Loveable characters? It's complicated
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

---

Content Warnings

Minor: Animal cruelty, Child death, and Classism

maddiereadswords's review against another edition

adventurous dark emotional tense medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? A mix
• Strong character development? Yes
• Loveable characters? Yes
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

The pacing of this book was so painfully slow for the first, like, third of it, but once it picked up, it was SO worth the read!! I do wish that we'd gotten more of the development of Mary and Maisie's relationship, but I can't lie, the beautiful writing, the realistic characters, and the fact that the concept of "lesbian Victorian paleontologist Frankenstein-ing a dinosaur" feels like it was developed in a lab specifically to appeal to me personally allows me to forgive a lot. Like...be gay, do crimes against god, you know?

---

Content Warnings

Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Misogyny, Sexism, and Classism

the_lesbrarian's review against another edition

adventurous dark reflective slow-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? Yes
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

women in stem™  makes terrifying but deeply sympathetic creature 

When Mary discovers the notes of her great uncle Victor Frankenstein, she, with the help of her disgraced and childish husband, stitches together her own eldritch dinosaur-esque creature in a desperate plot to prove her worth as a scientist, all while trying to avoid her feelings for her husband’s sister. 

The book had some pacing issues— it starts off slow and wraps up very quickly, but the story held my attention well enough that I found I did not mind. 

This dark & whimsical novel investigates a unique allegory to grief, motherhood, and queerness.

rep: queer fmc, indian sc 

---

Content Warnings

Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Miscarriage, Sexual assault, and Sexual harassment

Moderate: Animal cruelty, Body horror, and Misogyny

Minor: Addiction, Racism, Death of parent, Colonisation, and Classism

n0elle's review against another edition

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Character
• Strong character development? No
• Loveable characters? It's complicated
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

I have mixed feelings about this one. For one, I absolutely love classic retellings, especially if they’re sapphic and this one was a very interesting take on the original story of Frankenstein. 
Now, while I do know the author tried hard to make it appear historically correct, I found it absolutely exhausting to read hundreds of pages of men dictating the protagonist’s life, telling her what she can and can’t do, how she should behave, what (little) she’s worth. 
I’m all for women in STEM, driven by ambition and scientific ideas that lead through breakthroughs. BUT if  her ideas and success are always overshadowed by a man or even taken by a man, while she just sits idly by.. that’s infuriating, historically correct but still infuriating. And while the main character did get mad about these things, she always stayed quiet. In the rare moments she didn’t, she was belittled and reprimanded so much, I felt the shame of being a woman bleed through the pages. 
Maybe the writing was just too good and too real and it made me feel so many emotions, some of which I could have gone without. 

---

Content Warnings

Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Bullying, Child death, Chronic illness, Death, Gore, Gun violence, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Terminal illness, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Grief, Death of parent, Murder, Gaslighting, Abandonment, Alcohol, Sexual harassment, Injury/Injury detail, and Classism

random19379's review against another edition

adventurous dark funny hopeful mysterious reflective medium-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? A mix
• Strong character development? Yes
• Loveable characters? Yes
• Diverse cast of characters? No
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

---

Content Warnings

Moderate: Body horror, Miscarriage, Racism, Sexism, and Classism

nefariousbee's review against another edition

adventurous dark emotional inspiring slow-paced

• Plot- or character-driven? Plot
• Strong character development? Yes
• Loveable characters? No
• Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
• Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Underwhelming. I kept waiting for the main even to come, the monstrous, the hideous to begin, and it never did. The strangest thing is, if the writing allowed it, it would have? What I mean is in theory, what they sis was terrible and monstrous, only the way we are told the story doesn't really do it justice. 
I am frankly disappointed. This could have been exciting, dark, passionate... but it fell flat. Somehow it was barely dark. In my opinion this could have been a great book, but it needed to lean into the horror, and do some serious editing. As it is, it's just. Fine.

---

Content Warnings

Graphic: Ableism, Animal death, Chronic illness, Gore, Misogyny, Violence, Blood, Grief, and Injury/Injury detail

Moderate: Animal death, Child death, Drug use, Racism, Death of parent, Murder, Fire/Fire injury, Sexual harassment, and Classism

Minor: Emotional abuse, Colonisation, and Pandemic/Epidemic