Scan barcode
danielles_reads's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
My main complaint is that it is just SO LONG! A LOT of time is spent on describing the minutiae of the science of the experiment, including the various logistics, like gathering animal test subjects, mixing chemicals, etc. etc. And I just really don't care. It's funny because I often felt like this book really nailed the mid-1800s vibe and tone, including the looooong and meandering plot of popular 19th century classics! It reminded me of how I felt reading The Tenant of Wildfell Hall—like ok, this is pretty good, but it's exhausting. But I have a lot less patience for modern novels full of padding compared to classics.
I did really like Mary, even if she felt like a feminist caricature sometimes. Her feelings of loneliness and insecurity at her "weird" interests really got to me though, which helped strengthen her character. I was so happy when she started becoming close to Maisie, and finally had a friend. Her relationship with the Jamsetjees was great too.
I found myself really surprised by Henry's character arc though. I know it's true that some men in real life transform into a monster after getting married, but it was so jarring to see that in fiction with no transition. Henry seemed to genuinely care about Mary's interests when they were courting, but then he became a complete monster (though I will say he sometimes had good points about the creature). I feel like his character would have been a lot better if he was more nuanced—like if he was
Honestly the best part of this book was
Though I am surprised this is labeled as lgbtqia+ on StoryGraph, and seemingly advertised as such, because it is such a minor part of the narrative. I thought Mary's falling out with Catherine was really sad because they were so cute, but it never really went anywhere. Mary never actually makes a move on any other female character and only had a slight hint of sapphic longing. I kept hoping for
One thing that was majorly lacking in this book is actual reflection and philosophy of the making of the creature. For one, it was really weird to me that Mary finds the papers of her uncle that warned about the dangers of making a creature, and then goes, wow, this is brilliant, I have to do this myself! And Henry doesn't have any qualms about it either. Like what??? It's like someone reading a dystopian sci-fi novel and wanting to recreate the technology that caused or worsened the dystopia, just because they had a personal connection to it. And then there were obvious parallels with the creature and Mary's
I really liked the premise, and some of the characters, but in the end, I felt pretty let down by the slow pace and lack of deep introspection (especially compared to the original Frankenstein). Honestly, I think I would have DNFed this if it weren't the last book I was reading for a readathon. One good thing though is that it kinda makes me want to reread Frankenstein...
Graphic: Animal cruelty and Animal death
Moderate: Child death and Miscarriage
hpruett's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Moderate: Miscarriage
thecaffeinatedlibrary's review against another edition
5.0
I knew I'd love this book, knew it from the moment I found out that it was not only an unofficial caption is Mary Shelly's Frankenstein but about dinosaurs too. I was not wrong, I loved this book.
Mary's anger, her pride and her urge to do more—be more—make her an extremely compelling protagonist. There is much to love about this book, but Mary is easily the most extraordinary. I hated every single man in this book (except for Mr. Jamsetjee), there was a veritable amount of anger induced eye twitching going on.
I just... I adored this book and everything it says, not just about women in science, but women in the 19th century. The science itself, and the elements of paleontology, were so well done and so thoroughly researched.
I'm of the opinion that having read Frankenstein prior to picking this up will benefit you greatly. My love for Frankenstein certainly elevated my love for this book, and I think that is the best way to enjoy this.
If you're a fan of Frankenstein and dinosaurs, this one is for you.
Graphic: Animal death, Child death, Gun violence, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Racism, Sexism, Sexual violence, Blood, and Medical content
emsies's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Misogyny
Moderate: Chronic illness, Miscarriage, Racism, Grief, and Gaslighting
Minor: Ableism, Animal death, and Sexual harassment
sieben's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Minor: Miscarriage
blor_12's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
Graphic: Body horror, Gun violence, and Blood
Moderate: Emotional abuse, Infertility, Miscarriage, and Grief
kenley11's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Animal death, Body horror, Gore, Blood, Grief, Death of parent, Murder, and Sexual harassment
Moderate: Infertility, Miscarriage, and Racism
kylosten's review against another edition
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
4.5
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, and Misogyny
Minor: Miscarriage
therebeckening's review against another edition
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
3.75
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Gore, and Sexism
Moderate: Child death, Chronic illness, Toxic relationship, Violence, Xenophobia, Sexual harassment, and Colonisation
Minor: Miscarriage and Lesbophobia
Gambling, financial abuse,milesjmoran's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Animal death, Death, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Miscarriage, Racism, Sexism, Sexual assault, Medical content, Grief, Medical trauma, Death of parent, Murder, Pregnancy, and Colonisation