Reviews with content warning for Physical abuse - Farm der Tiere: Ein Märchen

It is pretty clear from the beginning, due to the time this book was written and the storyline, that this book is a single metaphor thematisizing WW2, especially the russian side (communism, UDSSR). However I did really enjoy reading it and symphazising with some of the animals on the farm.
Of course you can never compare a classic like this to modern literature and I never will. I think classics should always be viewed and reviewed in context of the time they were written in.
And for the 1940s George Orwell did really create a lovely book adressing and discussing some struggles and problems faced during the time of WW2. Through which the readers are fronted with current problems in a beautiffuly written and tragic story about a small farm rebelling against the rest of the world.

Content Warnings

trinidad_gondi's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Content Warnings

tomtomonomtom's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Jfc, Orwell delivers. Everything hits the fan, no object misses, not even one. I read this novel because I am a fan of Orwell's essays and his writing style, I want to see in turn how he writes a novel.

Took me a surprise that's for sure, but the novel did carry along with it the typical Orwell political topics (as it did with 1984). Least to say, this novel is depressing as hell and I was already in such a crisis before reading this.

The characters, because of their way of portrayal as animals, works wonders when it comes to symbolizing their role in the mad house.

Content Warnings

alannakitty97's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? N/A
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

Content Warnings

epellicci's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

Content Warnings

arianappstrg's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

3,75: Animal Farm might have been all the rage when it was first published but isn't it a teensy bit boring or raw for the 21st-century reader? Warning, this is a biased review (as are most of my reviews, more or less).

It might be a personal opinion or a matter of preference or I might have woken up on the wrong side of the bed but Orwell didn't convince me or captivate me as much as I expected. Aminal Farm is a classic and surely, a masterpiece, especially if you think about the socio-political circumstances of 1945 (countries fresh out of warfare and the like), the year of its publication. And yet, as I was reading, it felt like the ideas were there and they were terrifying, dark, and contemporary but the execution was poor. By execution, I mean the writing technique. Orwell's points were perfectly structured and mediated through the gradually anthropomorphic pigs and their self-serving decisions concerning the running of the farm. But the writing seemed to be very blunt and journalistic. At times, it read like an article or a literal journal entry (nothing wrong with either of these) and I'm not too sure it served the purpose of the story well. I can't help but think that perhaps a different style would have fleshed out the ideas and the strong social messages even more. Apart from that though, I was really intrigued to see what would happen next on the farm. I had this nagging question at the back of my head 'I must know more, what happens next? Keep reading' but it was only my own curiosity about the sequence of events that kept me going, not the writing.

On the same note, the ending threw me off completely. On the one hand, it read half-done and as if there could have been at least another five pages of plot and exploration of climax. If Orwell left the story at a cliff-hanger, it didn't have the desired effect. Unfortunately, for me, it was a lot of hype and no payoff. I didn't feel the least bit curious to sit and ponder over what the animals did about so and so situation they witnessed. It didn't get me thinking further though I wanted it to. Instead, I simply put the book down and that was that. On the other hand, perhaps that was the desired effect after all. A sense of boredom, of stagnation, of nothing ever happening to improve the living and working conditions of the animals, of everything being a vicious circle of greed and corruption (as tends to happen in human politics ;) ). According to this interpretation, it makes sense why there is no big climax, no great resolution. It makes the book more of a social/political commentary/fable than a story in the classical sense.

Mixed feelings, overall. I recognize its literary importance and can identify the reasons why it is read to this day but perhaps it wasn't my cup of tea.

Content Warnings

ashleycmms's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? N/A
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? N/A
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

More...